Malazan Empire: Powder Mage vs. Shadow Campaigns : which one is better and why? - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Powder Mage vs. Shadow Campaigns : which one is better and why? Kind of a "Sell me on" stand-off ;-)

#21 User is offline   Mentalist 

  • Martyr of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,500
  • Joined: 06-June 07
  • Location:'sauga/GTA, City of the Lion
  • Interests:Soccer, Chess, swimming, books, misc
  • Junior Mafia Mod

Posted 01 October 2019 - 01:18 AM

I haven't finished Shadow Campaigns (only read up to Book 4), so maybe it falls apart at the end.

But I found Powder Mage to be disappointing overall. Book 1 was very good, but I don't like Tamas as a character, and there was too much focus on him, and not enough on the detective who made Book 1 fun. Though the world-building is pretty fun and I'll get to the second series eventually.

Shadow campaigns otoh, is about Napoleonic-level warfare, revolutions spreading throughout the continent, while in the background there's a whole struggle between demons and Inquisition-that's-powered-by-demons. - also liked the characters in this series more. The ending of Book 4 worries me, but overall, I feel it's a better series.

I'll echo Abyss' Ketty Jay recco. Think TaleSpins, but with demons and stuff. Fun little series.

Best musketpunk standalone I've read was "Guns of Dawn" by Adrian Tchaikovsky. Magic's pretty low key, but that just makes it more impactful.

A similar variation is Chris Evans' "Of Bone and Thunder". Think Vietnam War but with dragon's instead of planes. I think the tech might not be gunpowder, though, can't recall off the top of my head. Evans also has a pure musketpunk trilogy "Iron Elves" (one of the earliest examples of the genre, actually- before it became popular), but I found that one to be pretty by the numbers.

There is also Tchaikovsky's "Shadows of the Apt" where guns get discovered and introduced as the series progresses, but I'm reluctant to recommend it, because the characterization in the first few books is really, REALLY bad. I stuck with the series, and Tchaikovsky manages some amazing things as he clearly improved as a writer while working on this series; it also has the distinction of being a 10-book epic that actually had a good ending. But those early books (2 and 3 especially) are REALLY weak. Unless you're all about world-building, cannot recommend.

Oh, and Chris Wooding's "Braided Path" . It's an Asian-set epic fantasy, and it's not really about the guns; but they most certainly use gunpowder. And that series is just great, and more people need to read it.

This post has been edited by Mentalist: 01 October 2019 - 01:21 AM

The problem with the gene pool is that there's no lifeguard
THE CONTESTtm WINNER--чемпіон самоконтролю

View PostJump Around, on 23 October 2011 - 11:04 AM, said:

And I want to state that Ment has out-weaseled me by far in this game.
0

#22 User is offline   Macros 

  • D'ivers Fuckwits
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 8,846
  • Joined: 28-January 08
  • Location:Ulster, disputed zone, British Empire.

Posted 01 October 2019 - 05:37 AM

WI'll second guns of dawn as a standalone
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users