[Gnaw]

D, on 12 September 2018 - 03:36 PM, said:

Gnaw, on 12 September 2018 - 03:33 PM, said:

lol I'm so quirky I'm not even playing to win lol the cake is a lie guys lololol

FTFY

I gambled early on. Lost that gamble. Schlieffen plan redux.

[Gnaw]

Tattersail_, on 12 September 2018 - 03:54 PM, said:

Gnaw, on 12 September 2018 - 03:53 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 12 September 2018 - 03:40 PM, said:

If you could gain leadership and me technology on this next turn then that'd be awesome.

D'rek has public disgrace. I'd rather see that go away in a way other than used on me.

Why would she use it on you?

Tattersail_, on 12 September 2018 - 03:55 PM, said:

and isn't that what negotiation is for ?

She stole Leadership. Her word means nothing now. At least to me.

[D'rek]

Gnaw, on 12 September 2018 - 03:53 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 12 September 2018 - 03:40 PM, said:

If you could gain leadership and me technology on this next turn then that'd be awesome.

D’rek has public disgrace. I’d rather see that go away in a way other than used on me.

I've never even considered using it on you

[Gnaw]

Tattersail_, on 12 September 2018 - 03:40 PM, said:

If you could gain leadership and me technology on this next turn then that'd be awesome.

Also Politics. Should it make it past you, we'll never see speaker again.

Edit: Morgoth, it’s your turn to take that. Tatts had it last and me before that.

This post has been edited by Gnaw: 12 September 2018 - 04:37 PM

[Gnaw]

Bereg? Does that mean you don’t need my cruisers moved?

[Imperial Historian]

So khell I've moved the wormhole from the asteroid field but if you want to take me up on the deal to move to starpoint let me know.

D'rek is pretty spread out right now and vulnerable to your fleets, low in the strategy card order and if she is publicly disgraced out of action cards. Your not going to have much better chances of taking her valuable territories, especially if I attack her as well. Just food for thought.

[Imperial Historian]

Gnaw, on 12 September 2018 - 05:32 PM, said:

Bereg? Does that mean you don’t need my cruisers moved?

I don't think I ever asked you to move your cruisers?

[Gnaw]

Imperial Historian, on 12 September 2018 - 05:37 PM, said:

Gnaw, on 12 September 2018 - 05:32 PM, said:

Bereg? Does that mean you don't need my cruisers moved?

I don't think I ever asked you to move your cruisers?

You didn’t. I was assuming you would. Thought you were going to drop that in Gwynan or Nevant.

[twelve]

Gnaw, on 12 September 2018 - 03:56 PM, said:

D, on 12 September 2018 - 03:36 PM, said:

Gnaw, on 12 September 2018 - 03:33 PM, said:

lol I'm so quirky I'm not even playing to win lol the cake is a lie guys lololol

FTFY

I gambled early on. Lost that gamble. Schlieffen plan redux.

It was a long shot, hail mary, prayer, etc. not a gamble. The only reason you even got as close as you did was with Tatts help.

I'm struggling to decide what I want to do for the rest of the game. Initially once it looked like I was going to survive I thought to try and outscore you and Tatts. Hence my willingness to forgive if given back what was stolen. But will that be fun for me? I could Sink Tatts game (Don't need to do it to you as you did a fine job of that all by yourself). He definitely deserves it. I could do what you have stated as your goal now that your game is toast and help someone else win.

Hmmmmm. Choices need to be made. Well time to ponder Tatts offer see if there is something there that helps me make up my mind.

[twelve]

Tatts, I missed the action card portion of the deal when I skimmed it this morning. What card is the first one you want to give?

[twelve]

twelve, on 12 September 2018 - 07:23 PM, said:

Tatts, I missed the action card portion of the deal when I skimmed it this morning. What card is the first one you want to give?

Nevermind. Blend showe'd it to me.

[twelve]

That deal is better than I realized at first. There are a few amendments I would like to make though. First I don't have a 4 trade good trade agreement pn. I'll give you a 3 though. Second leave a destroyer behind on Thiabah. I want to blow something up as my one concession to being petty. If you agree to these changes we can have a deal.

[Khellendros]

twelve, on 12 September 2018 - 07:31 PM, said:

That deal is better than I realized at first. There are a few amendments I would like to make though. First I don't have a 4 trade good trade agreement pn. I'll give you a 3 though. Second leave a destroyer behind on Thiabah. I want to blow something up as my one concession to being petty. If you agree to these changes we can have a deal.

Oh yeah, like that's not part of a secret objective you've been adamant about that Destroyer from the beginning.

[Khellendros]

Imperial Historian, on 12 September 2018 - 05:36 PM, said:

So khell I've moved the wormhole from the asteroid field but if you want to take me up on the deal to move to starpoint let me know.

D'rek is pretty spread out right now and vulnerable to your fleets, low in the strategy card order and if she is publicly disgraced out of action cards. Your not going to have much better chances of taking her valuable territories, especially if I attack her as well. Just food for thought.

I'm listening, but not decided and not sure how you expect that to happen now you've moved the wormhole.

[twelve]

I'm willing to call in my votes to influence either objective. Without any bribing I'm supporting either Khell for the Crown, or IH for public Execution.

[Galactic Council]

Please note that the action card deck has now been reshuffled, so you will start seeing cards that have already been played going forward.

[Tattersail_]

twelve, on 12 September 2018 - 07:31 PM, said:

That deal is better than I realized at first. There are a few amendments I would like to make though. First I don't have a 4 trade good trade agreement pn. I'll give you a 3 though. Second leave a destroyer behind on Thiabah. I want to blow something up as my one concession to being petty. If you agree to these changes we can have a deal.

Amend to trade pn worth 3 +1 TG when you use my trade PN.

Leave a destroyer behind.

Deal.

[twelve]

Tattersail_, on 12 September 2018 - 07:59 PM, said:

twelve, on 12 September 2018 - 07:31 PM, said:

That deal is better than I realized at first. There are a few amendments I would like to make though. First I don't have a 4 trade good trade agreement pn. I'll give you a 3 though. Second leave a destroyer behind on Thiabah. I want to blow something up as my one concession to being petty. If you agree to these changes we can have a deal.

Amend to trade pn worth 3 +1 TG when you use my trade PN.

Leave a destroyer behind.

Deal.

Deal

[twelve]

I'll post the trade of pns once the agenda phase officially starts. Just need Nom to finish his turn and we can move forward.

[Imperial Historian]

Khellendros, on 12 September 2018 - 07:39 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 12 September 2018 - 05:36 PM, said:

So khell I've moved the wormhole from the asteroid field but if you want to take me up on the deal to move to starpoint let me know.

D'rek is pretty spread out right now and vulnerable to your fleets, low in the strategy card order and if she is publicly disgraced out of action cards. Your not going to have much better chances of taking her valuable territories, especially if I attack her as well. Just food for thought.

I'm listening, but not decided and not sure how you expect that to happen now you've moved the wormhole.

I'll give you my racial PN and you can move it back. If you agree.