[D'rek]

Imperial Historian, on 17 June 2018 - 08:10 AM, said:

D, on 17 June 2018 - 03:18 AM, said:

@Tatts:

Tattersail_, on 15 June 2018 - 07:37 PM, said:

Exchange Ceasefire PN with IH for his Ceasefire PN.

You already traded your Ceasefire PN away to Blend on his 3rd turn this round:

Blend, on 06 June 2018 - 07:33 PM, said:

Activate Trade secondary.
Refresh Commodities.

Activate Imperial Secondary
Draw 1 Secret Objective.

---

In exchange for me playing Warfare this turn, Tatts is trading to me his Ceasefire PN as well as the agreed-upon action card (noted in my provisional action in my game PM D'rek).
Nico pillages 1 trade good from Blend.

In exchange for me playing Warfare this turn, Gnaw is giving me back my Trade Agreement PN.
Nico pillages 1 trade good from Blend.

Take 1 action card given to me by Khell.
Nico pillages 1 trade good from Khell.

Provide that same 1 action card to Tatts. (no pillage)

Trade 4 commodities to Twelve for 4 TGs (assuming Nico pillages).
Nico pillages 1 trade good from Blend.
Nico pillages 1 trade good from Twelve.

Hang on the ceasefire exchange was part of the deal, not two separate deals (was very specific about this to avoid being looted twice by Nico),if the ceasefire exchange isn't happening there isn't a deal but you seems to have still carried it out?

It was posted as 2 separate deals, so yes I still implemented the one that was possible.

[Blend]

For the record, my last message to D'rek regards Agenda phase was to put my votes on FOR Economic Sanctions. Doesn't make a difference as it still passed, but not sure why she put my votes on Sakulag for the second agenda, as that wasn't what I PM'd.

[D'rek]

Blend, on 17 June 2018 - 04:44 PM, said:

For the record, my last message to D'rek regards Agenda phase was to put my votes on FOR Economic Sanctions. Doesn't make a difference as it still passed, but not sure why she put my votes on Sakulag for the second agenda, as that wasn't what I PM'd.

Huh, no idea how that happened. Just mis-read it, I guess.

[Khellendros]

I deliberately left you construction Twelve

[Gnaw]

Morgoth I’d appreciate leadership at your earliest convenience.
I’m assuming that turn 1 will be ruining someone’s game. Mine or Twelve’s.

[twelve]

Khellendros, on 17 June 2018 - 09:58 PM, said:

I deliberately left you construction Twelve

I was hoping for diplomacy if I could have gotten Gnaws pn. Still shocked he's not trading me.

[Nicodimas]

@ gnaw what strategy card did I get ?

[Nicodimas]

(Not warfare right ?)

[Gnaw]

Trade I believe

[D'rek]

Nicodimas, on 18 June 2018 - 03:31 AM, said:

@ gnaw what strategy card did I get ?

TRADE, and you need to make a post indicating such (with an up-to-date status block)

[Nicodimas]

D, on 18 June 2018 - 04:28 AM, said:

Nicodimas, on 18 June 2018 - 03:31 AM, said:

@ gnaw what strategy card did I get ?

TRADE, and you need to make a post indicating such (with an up-to-date status block)

I played something on 12. Tell me how this resolves

[Nicodimas]

We coulda divided half the universe 12

Coulda.

Oh well..

[twelve]

Nicodimas, on 18 June 2018 - 04:31 AM, said:

D, on 18 June 2018 - 04:28 AM, said:

Nicodimas, on 18 June 2018 - 03:31 AM, said:

@ gnaw what strategy card did I get ?

TRADE, and you need to make a post indicating such (with an up-to-date status block)

I played something on 12. Tell me how this resolves

Yay!!!!

[Imperial Historian]

You know you could have posted the card you had played on thread Nico, so the rest of us can carry on with the game.

[Tattersail_]

Gnaw, I am going to borrow Mansa III to try gain the Form Galactic Brain Trust VP, I thought letting you know early would let you exhaust it and move your fighter if you wanted to.

[Imperial Historian]

Tattersail_, on 18 June 2018 - 07:37 AM, said:

Gnaw, I am going to borrow Mansa III to try gain the Form Galactic Brain Trust VP, I thought letting you know early would let you exhaust it and move your fighter if you wanted to.

Fully expecting gnaw not to agree to this.

[Imperial Historian]

ANTI-INTELLECTUAL REVOLUTION (LAW)
FOR: After a player researches a technology, they must destroy one of their nonfighter ships.
AGAINST: At the start of the next strategy phase each player exhausts one planet for each technology they have researched.

Does morgoth research technology or not? Curious if this affects him. Also does each technology they have researched mean every researched technology or are the starting techs excluded?

[Tattersail_]

Imperial Historian, on 18 June 2018 - 08:00 AM, said:

ANTI-INTELLECTUAL REVOLUTION (LAW)
FOR: After a player researches a technology, they must destroy one of their nonfighter ships.
AGAINST: At the start of the next strategy phase each player exhausts one planet for each technology they have researched.

Does morgoth research technology or not? Curious if this affects him. Also does each technology they have researched mean every researched technology or are the starting techs excluded?

Morgoth doesn't research Tech so it would not affect him.

I suspect there is only one round left after this one, so probably for would be best for most people.

[Khellendros]

Tattersail_, on 18 June 2018 - 08:38 AM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 18 June 2018 - 08:00 AM, said:

ANTI-INTELLECTUAL REVOLUTION (LAW)
FOR: After a player researches a technology, they must destroy one of their nonfighter ships.
AGAINST: At the start of the next strategy phase each player exhausts one planet for each technology they have researched.

Does morgoth research technology or not? Curious if this affects him. Also does each technology they have researched mean every researched technology or are the starting techs excluded?

Morgoth doesn't research Tech so it would not affect him.

I suspect there is only one round left after this one, so probably for would be best for most people.

I suspect we'll see the agenda discarded.

[Khellendros]

Imperial Historian, on 18 June 2018 - 07:19 AM, said:

You know you could have posted the card you had played on thread Nico, so the rest of us can carry on with the game.

I agree. Nico, if you're around and have something to post which should be in the game thread, then post it in the game thread. Don't tell us you're intending to do something and then expect D'rek to do it for you when you yourself are clearly around and able to post in the game thread. And if you're not sure at which stage the game is at, or if it's your turn, then once again, look in the game thread. That's what it's there for.