Help
This topic is locked
Twilight Imperium (I) - Chatty Thread
#4541
Khellendros 
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 15 June 2018 - 02:57 PM
Gnaw, as twelve is now voting Mehar, fancy switching your votes to Sakulag?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4542
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 15 June 2018 - 02:59 PM
Oh and Morgoth, the path to twelve is totally open for you as he doesn't want to deal.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4543
twelve
- Master of the Deck
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 9,166
- Joined: 27-March 09
- Location:Pacific Northwest
Posted 15 June 2018 - 03:12 PM
Khellendros, on 15 June 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:
Oh and Morgoth, the path to twelve is totally open for you as he doesn't want to deal.
It always has been because you decided to ignore ever building ships.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#4544
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 15 June 2018 - 03:14 PM
twelve, on 15 June 2018 - 03:12 PM, said:
Khellendros, on 15 June 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:
Oh and Morgoth, the path to twelve is totally open for you as he doesn't want to deal.
It always has been because you decided to ignore ever building ships.
Actually he blew up my space dock
This post has been edited by Khellendros: 15 June 2018 - 03:15 PM
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4545
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 15 June 2018 - 03:21 PM
If Gnaw doesn't want to switch to Sakulag, then shall we (me, Tatts, Blend) all put our votes in FOR so that Twelve doesn't get what he wants?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4546
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 15 June 2018 - 03:21 PM
Me and Blend, anyway.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4547
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 15 June 2018 - 03:22 PM
It'd be nice to see where everyone's at at the moment.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4548
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 15 June 2018 - 03:24 PM
FOR: IH = 14
AGAINST: Tapper = 13
Anyone else declared for this agenda?
AGAINST: Tapper = 13
Anyone else declared for this agenda?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4549
Blend
- Gentleman of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 4,579
- Joined: 28-March 03
- Location:Ottawa
Posted 15 June 2018 - 03:31 PM
I've got my five votes placed on FOR.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#4550
Imperial Historian
- Master of the Deck
-
- Group: Administrators
- Posts: 7,882
- Joined: 08-February 04
Posted 15 June 2018 - 03:37 PM
D, on 15 June 2018 - 01:04 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 15 June 2018 - 09:13 AM, said:
Tattersail_, on 15 June 2018 - 08:50 AM, said:
How about you show me 5/11 cards when I use it? Your choice?
Drek would this be legal?
No
That is a bummer. How do you want to do this Tatts? You want an action card that takes a move right?
#4551
Tattersail_
- formerly Ganoes Paran
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 13,262
- Joined: 16-July 10
- Location:Wirral
-
Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
snapchat - rustyspoon84
Posted 15 June 2018 - 03:39 PM
Imperial Historian, on 15 June 2018 - 03:37 PM, said:
D, on 15 June 2018 - 01:04 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 15 June 2018 - 09:13 AM, said:
Tattersail_, on 15 June 2018 - 08:50 AM, said:
How about you show me 5/11 cards when I use it? Your choice?
Drek would this be legal?
No
That is a bummer. How do you want to do this Tatts? You want an action card that takes a move right?
Yes, would much prefer Ceasefire PN swap, Trade PN + 1TG for your racial PN, and you can declare which card you want me to take. It doesn't matter if I know what cards you've got as we'll have an active ceasefire running. Not sure how else to do it. Unless we just exchange ceasefire PN's.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#4552
Imperial Historian
- Master of the Deck
-
- Group: Administrators
- Posts: 7,882
- Joined: 08-February 04
Posted 15 June 2018 - 04:17 PM
This probably isn't going to be in my best interests but would this be an acceptable card for trade:
AN | Signal Jamming | Play as an Action | Choose a non-home system that contains or is adjacent to one of your ships. Place a command token from another player's reinforcements in that system.
Will trade my pn with my ceasefire pn for tg, ceasefire pn, your trade PN and no placing wormholes in my systems for the duration of the ceasefire. On the understanding you will take just that card and you also won't reveal my hand. I've no plans to move on any of your current territories but if you look like winning or I have a chance of winning I will attack you, though obviously at a disadvantage due to ceasefire exchange. I expect the same from you.
Is this acceptable?
AN | Signal Jamming | Play as an Action | Choose a non-home system that contains or is adjacent to one of your ships. Place a command token from another player's reinforcements in that system.
Will trade my pn with my ceasefire pn for tg, ceasefire pn, your trade PN and no placing wormholes in my systems for the duration of the ceasefire. On the understanding you will take just that card and you also won't reveal my hand. I've no plans to move on any of your current territories but if you look like winning or I have a chance of winning I will attack you, though obviously at a disadvantage due to ceasefire exchange. I expect the same from you.
Is this acceptable?
#4553
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 15 June 2018 - 04:52 PM
FOR: IH, Blend = 19
AGAINST: Tapper = 13
Anyone else declared for this agenda?
Twelve, looks like you can't win AGAINST at the moment, so why not give your votes to Sakulag and we can be BFFs again.
AGAINST: Tapper = 13
Anyone else declared for this agenda?
Twelve, looks like you can't win AGAINST at the moment, so why not give your votes to Sakulag and we can be BFFs again.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4554
Tattersail_
- formerly Ganoes Paran
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 13,262
- Joined: 16-July 10
- Location:Wirral
-
Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
snapchat - rustyspoon84
Posted 15 June 2018 - 04:55 PM
Imperial Historian, on 15 June 2018 - 04:17 PM, said:
This probably isn't going to be in my best interests but would this be an acceptable card for trade:
AN | Signal Jamming | Play as an Action | Choose a non-home system that contains or is adjacent to one of your ships. Place a command token from another player's reinforcements in that system.
Will trade my pn with my ceasefire pn for tg, ceasefire pn, your trade PN and no placing wormholes in my systems for the duration of the ceasefire. On the understanding you will take just that card and you also won't reveal my hand. I've no plans to move on any of your current territories but if you look like winning or I have a chance of winning I will attack you, though obviously at a disadvantage due to ceasefire exchange. I expect the same from you.
Is this acceptable?
AN | Signal Jamming | Play as an Action | Choose a non-home system that contains or is adjacent to one of your ships. Place a command token from another player's reinforcements in that system.
Will trade my pn with my ceasefire pn for tg, ceasefire pn, your trade PN and no placing wormholes in my systems for the duration of the ceasefire. On the understanding you will take just that card and you also won't reveal my hand. I've no plans to move on any of your current territories but if you look like winning or I have a chance of winning I will attack you, though obviously at a disadvantage due to ceasefire exchange. I expect the same from you.
Is this acceptable?
This is acceptable.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#4555
twelve
- Master of the Deck
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 9,166
- Joined: 27-March 09
- Location:Pacific Northwest
Posted 15 June 2018 - 05:29 PM
Khellendros, on 15 June 2018 - 04:52 PM, said:
FOR: IH, Blend = 19
AGAINST: Tapper = 13
Anyone else declared for this agenda?
Twelve, looks like you can't win AGAINST at the moment, so why not give your votes to Sakulag and we can be BFFs again.
AGAINST: Tapper = 13
Anyone else declared for this agenda?
Twelve, looks like you can't win AGAINST at the moment, so why not give your votes to Sakulag and we can be BFFs again.
I think my deal with tapper is binding but even still if Gnaw throws some votes at it then it still has a chance though I don't think he will.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#4556
Khellendros
- Saboteur of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 7,298
- Joined: 14-August 07
Posted 15 June 2018 - 06:11 PM
twelve, on 15 June 2018 - 05:29 PM, said:
Khellendros, on 15 June 2018 - 04:52 PM, said:
FOR: IH, Blend = 19
AGAINST: Tapper = 13
Anyone else declared for this agenda?
Twelve, looks like you can't win AGAINST at the moment, so why not give your votes to Sakulag and we can be BFFs again.
AGAINST: Tapper = 13
Anyone else declared for this agenda?
Twelve, looks like you can't win AGAINST at the moment, so why not give your votes to Sakulag and we can be BFFs again.
I think my deal with tapper is binding but even still if Gnaw throws some votes at it then it still has a chance though I don't think he will.
Your deal was dumb.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4559
Gnaw
- Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 5,966
- Joined: 16-June 12
Posted 15 June 2018 - 08:02 PM
Morgoth, on 15 June 2018 - 07:30 PM, said:
What are we waiting for exactly?
At a guess: Nico
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#4560
twelve
- Master of the Deck
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 9,166
- Joined: 27-March 09
- Location:Pacific Northwest
Posted 15 June 2018 - 08:25 PM
Gnaw, on 15 June 2018 - 08:02 PM, said:
Morgoth, on 15 June 2018 - 07:30 PM, said:
What are we waiting for exactly?
At a guess: Nico
So is there any chance I can buy your pn? I can't see how it would be so necessary for you to go first. But I'm willing to throw in my political secrets pn now too if you can have your mind changed.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
