Twilight Imperium (I) - Chatty Thread
#4101
Posted 10 June 2018 - 12:45 AM
Welp, thats my game down the drain.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#4102
Posted 10 June 2018 - 12:55 AM
Everyone! We have to unite against the seemingly inevitable victory of Tapper/Morgoth/Twelve (delete as appropriate)!! It's our only shot!
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4103
Posted 10 June 2018 - 01:06 AM
Khellendros, on 10 June 2018 - 12:55 AM, said:
Everyone! We have to unite against the seemingly inevitable victory of Tapper/Morgoth/Twelve (delete as appropriate)!! It's our only shot!
This coming from the player 2 VP points or more ahead of everyone else.
This post has been edited by twelve: 10 June 2018 - 01:08 AM
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#4104
Posted 10 June 2018 - 01:16 AM
Tapper, Morgoth.
Let's make our triumvirate a little more 'three' than the current 'two plus one'
Let me give my support for the throne to one of you for the other person's. And I propose that we each exchange Ceasefire as well.
That way each of us has a problem regardless of who we might wish to backstab.
I would have Tapper's SftT and Morgoth's ceasefire.
Tapper would have my ceasefire and Morgoth's SftT.
Morgoth would have my SftT and Tapper's ceasefire.
Or the other way around. 🤷🏻♂️
Let's make our triumvirate a little more 'three' than the current 'two plus one'
Let me give my support for the throne to one of you for the other person's. And I propose that we each exchange Ceasefire as well.
That way each of us has a problem regardless of who we might wish to backstab.
I would have Tapper's SftT and Morgoth's ceasefire.
Tapper would have my ceasefire and Morgoth's SftT.
Morgoth would have my SftT and Tapper's ceasefire.
Or the other way around. 🤷🏻♂️
This post has been edited by Gnaw: 10 June 2018 - 01:19 AM
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#4105
Posted 10 June 2018 - 01:28 AM
Once a Promissory Note has been put into a player's "play area" (only some PNs do this - Support for the Throne, Promise of Protection, Trade Convoys, Antivirus), it cannot be traded to other players anymore.
#4106
Posted 10 June 2018 - 01:41 AM
Gnaw, on 05 June 2018 - 12:30 AM, said:
Tatts: I'm getting out of your way. You want to come after me? Fine.
Don't and I'll give you the speaker token. Do and it goes to Tapper.
Don't and I'll give you the speaker token. Do and it goes to Tapper.
twelve, on 10 June 2018 - 12:34 AM, said:
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#4107
Posted 10 June 2018 - 01:41 AM
D, on 10 June 2018 - 01:28 AM, said:
Once a Promissory Note has been put into a player's "play area" (only some PNs do this - Support for the Throne, Promise of Protection, Trade Convoys, Antivirus), it cannot be traded to other players anymore.
Damn.
Did Tatts not leave a move with you?
This post has been edited by Gnaw: 10 June 2018 - 01:42 AM
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#4108
Posted 10 June 2018 - 01:57 AM
Gnaw, on 10 June 2018 - 01:41 AM, said:
Okay so the speaker token is off the table, but I'll need something of value to turn off my pds. Are you willing to give me anything?
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#4109
Posted 10 June 2018 - 03:04 AM
twelve, on 10 June 2018 - 01:57 AM, said:
Gnaw, on 10 June 2018 - 01:41 AM, said:
Okay so the speaker token is off the table, but I'll need something of value to turn off my pds. Are you willing to give me anything?
Nothing.
In light of recent news from Lodor we are re-evaluating our plans.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#4110
Posted 10 June 2018 - 04:09 AM
Now I give Khell the opportunity to block that damn wormhole. Choices, choices.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#4111
Posted 10 June 2018 - 05:50 AM
Spoiler
Dammittohell
This post has been edited by Gnaw: 10 June 2018 - 05:51 AM
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#4112
#4113
Posted 10 June 2018 - 05:52 AM
And wow, that was some battle!
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
#4114
Posted 10 June 2018 - 06:36 AM
#4115
Posted 10 June 2018 - 06:42 AM
I thought I read somewhere where it said specifically that fighters could not block other ships.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#4116
Posted 10 June 2018 - 06:42 AM
Wow, that's weird. It's not just an errata, it's an outright changed rule from the learn-to-play manual. Huh. Well, I guess now we all know.
#4117
Posted 10 June 2018 - 06:44 AM
twelve, on 10 June 2018 - 06:42 AM, said:
I thought I read somewhere where it said specifically that fighters could not block other ships.
The Learn-to-Play manual says (said?):
Quote
A ship cannot pass through a system that contains another
player’s ships, excluding fighters.
player’s ships, excluding fighters.
But it seems they've changed that rule in version 1.1 of the main rules booklet. Maybe there is a updated Learn-to-Play manual out there with that changed, too, but my PDF still says the old rule.
#4118
Posted 10 June 2018 - 07:43 AM
Quick question regarding my bombardment in my turn, the war sun hits on a 3, and all 3 rolls are 3 or more, so is that 3 hits not 2 or does it hit above a 3?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#4119
Posted 10 June 2018 - 08:12 AM
Do we have new agendas?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#4120
Posted 10 June 2018 - 08:43 AM
No, Gnaw placed them both at the bottom of the deck.
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil