Thyrllan, on 13 June 2017 - 02:54 PM, said:
Galain, on 13 June 2017 - 10:31 AM, said:
Nimander Golit, on 13 June 2017 - 10:23 AM, said:
I was doubting Lock's choice of doing the fake reveal now but when I read things like this...
Galain, on 13 June 2017 - 09:56 AM, said:
[...]
As there seems to be more reason for Nim to lie in order to defend themselves than there was for Lock to attempt a fake reveal at this juncture.
... I'm starting to appreciate the smarts in that move. Reveal always puts you in advantaged position versus a counter reveal. I mean, just look at the logic of this sentence: there seems to be more reason for Nim to lie in order to defend themselves - well there also seems to be more reason for Nim to tell the truth to defend himself, isn't that right? Eh.
Finally, if Lock is the vampire leader, he's likely to have an LP, which essentially gives him an additional Night of roaming free. Haven't thought about it earlier. Now, what seemed like jumping the gun with a fake reveal makes much more sense.
As I said, I suspect that you may both be telling the truth, which puts us in a bad position. I think that, if I'm wrong in that belief, there's slightly more chance that you are not telling the truth, which is why I voted for you. However this day pans out, I don't have a good feeling about the lynch result.
Are you paying attention? If Nim is not lying, humans are seriously shooting themselves in the foot right now.
Nim would need balls of steel to imply what he's implying if he's lying (because if he's faking, he's the insta-target for person who he's faking)
I have no clue what Lock's game is, but it's certainly detrimental to the non-vampires.
I am paying attention, thanks for asking. I am taking into account what I've read in this game thread, and what I know outside of it (which is to say, nothing for the latter). And from that I have reached my conclusion.
Now both you and Nim are apparently implying that you are implying something with your implying. I do not know what that is. If you want to illuminate the rest of us, then go ahead. From my perspective, Nim has only denied killing Silchas (fine), has posted a unconvincing reason for why Lock might lie at this point (bit more iffy), and suggested that they are some role/have some mechanic reminiscent of the previous game - which I did not play, so it means nothing to me.
I think with either lynch, non-vampires are probably going to end up shooting themselves in the foot. The question is, can we drop it and look at something else, or are we stuck with lynching one of these two?
I can still be convinced for either lynch, but the only way that will happen is if other people actually come on and give their views with regard to this situation