[Rashan]

On my way to work from dentist, catching up

[Rashan]

 Path-Shaper, on 15 May 2017 - 12:55 PM, said:

It is Day 4. The clock has been frozen with 35 Hours and 01 Minutes remaining.

6 Players still alive: Ampelas, Galain, Kilava, Merrid, Nimander Golit, Rashan

4 votes to lynch, 3 votes to go to night.

3 Votes for Night ( Nimander Golit, Rashan, Galain )

Players not voted: Ampelas, Kilava, Merrid


It is now Night 2.


Night 2 passes without event.


New rule - first amongst town or killers to vote Night/submit a no-kill a third time in a row will automatically lose the game.


It is Day 5. 35 hours and 59 minutes remaining

6 Players still alive: Ampelas, Galain, Kilava, Merrid, Nimander Golit, Rashan

4 votes to lynch, 3 votes to go to night.


Players not voted: Ampelas, Galain, Kilava, Merrid, Nimander Golit, Rashan

I sense the involvement of a bored angry Venge.

[Ampelas]

Really busy morning today. Crap tons of work piled on my desk. I will probably have a moment or two at lunch, but this will be it for about 4 hours.

I still think our best bet is Kilava for aforementioned reasons (though I really do need a reread of the most recent events). I will put down a vote later after I have a chance to review. If you all get vote happy, at least give me a chance to read and make my own vote before cutting off my circulation (and maybe, keep me off L-1, just in case, you know?).

Anyway. Talk soon.

[Rashan]

 Nimander Golit, on 15 May 2017 - 02:21 PM, said:

The new rule is scum-sided because it punishes town for forcing scum to allow town to live.

Not killing town is playing against scum's wincon because killing town is the ENTIRE REASON FOR SCUM'S EXISTENCE. If anyone is getting punished here, it should be scum.

I'll see you folks in a couple days.

Edit: typo

Your brand of slow, measured, "let's just not lose" logic is barely known around these parts.
In Malaz mafiaz, it's all or nothing, win or lose.

[Merrid]

 Nimander Golit, on 15 May 2017 - 02:21 PM, said:

The new rule is scum-sided because it punishes town for forcing scum to allow town to live.

Not killing town is playing against scum's wincon because killing town is the ENTIRE REASON FOR SCUM'S EXISTENCE. If anyone is getting punished here, it should be scum.

I'll see you folks in a couple days.

Edit: typo

No, reaching parity by whatever method is scums win condition. If they do that by forcing town into a festering pool of WIFOM that's good for them. If not killing makes it so that we have to make a choice in a bad situation that's good for them. That they can keep us at an even number of players so we have to pick between more alts? Good for them. If where you play Mafia they can't win without a kill they're not playing right.

I really don't give a fuck any more with your play. Your "plan" is ridiculous*. Your claim that the rule is scum-sided is ridiculous*. You can't play Mafia as you have so ably demonstrated. You can't even go away for a couple of days successfully. You are of no more use to town other than a lawn ornament.

Lets consider going "Mountainous" as you yourself say

 Nimander Golit, on 08 May 2017 - 03:20 PM, said:

I have zero qualms with turning a game mountainous if it flips scum in the process.

Vote Nimander Golit

Play the game or get lost**, fruitloop***.

I remain open, as ever, to reasonable play.



*Yeah that wasn't the r-word I originally typed.
**Again not original.
***Ironically this one is as loopy as typed.

[Merrid]

 Rashan, on 15 May 2017 - 03:00 PM, said:

I sense the involvement of a bored angry Venge.

If only he were playing.

[Merrid]

 Galain, on 15 May 2017 - 02:34 PM, said:

Kilava "could" be Merrid's symp so no way would I follow his vote. I'll follow Rashan's vote though, if he thinks Amp is the right call I would follow that.

It's unusual for me to not be the one being called a symp. Your post therefore makes me suspicious.

[Merrid]

 Galain, on 15 May 2017 - 02:33 PM, said:

I'll vote Merrid, then I know who i'd lynch if I die or if one of Amp/Kilava die, I am voting the other. Seems simple.

Then you'd be dead, surely?

[Nimander Golit]

 Galain, on 15 May 2017 - 02:34 PM, said:

Kilava "could" be Merrid's symp so no way would I follow his vote. I'll follow Rashan's vote though, if he thinks Amp is the right call I would follow that.

That post is a steaming pile of crap that makes no sense whatsoever.

If you believe Kilava is Merrid's symp, there are no grounds to be willing to follow ANYBODY onto Ampelas.

That abortion of a thought process just earned you scum points.

[Nimander Golit]

Galain is just doing their best to keep all options open.

[Galain]

Said it all up thread. There is a reason.

[Galain]

 Merrid, on 15 May 2017 - 03:31 PM, said:

 Galain, on 15 May 2017 - 02:33 PM, said:

I'll vote Merrid, then I know who i'd lynch if I die or if one of Amp/Kilava die, I am voting the other. Seems simple.

Then you'd be dead, surely?

After day ended I would post my thoughts, the killer could not switch then.

[Nimander Golit]

I'm not voting outside of Kilava/Merrid if Rashan wants to lynch anyone today.

Those two want to demand a lynch? Fine. That's scummy as fuck and they can die.

[Galain]

 Nimander Golit, on 15 May 2017 - 03:31 PM, said:

 Galain, on 15 May 2017 - 02:34 PM, said:

Kilava "could" be Merrid's symp so no way would I follow his vote. I'll follow Rashan's vote though, if he thinks Amp is the right call I would follow that.

That post is a steaming pile of crap that makes no sense whatsoever.

If you believe Kilava is Merrid's symp, there are no grounds to be willing to follow ANYBODY onto Ampelas.

That abortion of a thought process just earned you scum points.

They are earned I guess.

I do not want to push hard at anyone Nim. I have outlined reasons on why each of the remaining players could be scum, I am waiting for input from the rest of you to develop the thoughts further.

[Galain]

 Nimander Golit, on 15 May 2017 - 03:32 PM, said:

Galain is just doing their best to keep all options open.

Yes!

My main scum suspect is Merrid, I have said why.

I do not believe Kilava is Merrid's symp. I think it was Denul, but we have to work off WCS.

[Nimander Golit]

 Galain, on 15 May 2017 - 03:36 PM, said:

I have outlined reasons on why each of the remaining players could be scum, I am waiting for input from the rest of you to develop the thoughts further.

Don't.

I distrust those who don't push their own reads, and you're just fishing for acceptance here.

[Galain]

I understand but we got to explore all options. I don't want to be blindsided.

[Nimander Golit]

 Galain, on 15 May 2017 - 03:38 PM, said:

 Nimander Golit, on 15 May 2017 - 03:32 PM, said:

Galain is just doing their best to keep all options open.

Yes!

No!

That's scum play.

Thank you for defining your stance, finally.

[Kilava]

 Merrid, on 15 May 2017 - 03:31 PM, said:

 Galain, on 15 May 2017 - 02:33 PM, said:

I'll vote Merrid, then I know who i'd lynch if I die or if one of Amp/Kilava die, I am voting the other. Seems simple.

Then you'd be dead, surely?

Heh, interesting.

[Kilava]

 Galain, on 15 May 2017 - 03:36 PM, said:

 Nimander Golit, on 15 May 2017 - 03:31 PM, said:

 Galain, on 15 May 2017 - 02:34 PM, said:

Kilava "could" be Merrid's symp so no way would I follow his vote. I'll follow Rashan's vote though, if he thinks Amp is the right call I would follow that.

That post is a steaming pile of crap that makes no sense whatsoever.

If you believe Kilava is Merrid's symp, there are no grounds to be willing to follow ANYBODY onto Ampelas.

That abortion of a thought process just earned you scum points.

They are earned I guess.

I do not want to push hard at anyone Nim. I have outlined reasons on why each of the remaining players could be scum, I am waiting for input from the rest of you to develop the thoughts further.

You are being extremely conciliatory this game. That's not really like you.