[Jalan]

Ampelas, on 10 May 2017 - 06:25 PM, said:

Considering there was still an hour and a half till end of day, you just showing up and Rashan promising more input when he got home, I thought it was reasonable. If we had been wrong and it was a roleless innocent, would you have called it stalling?

The problem with that question is that it doesn't really apply because SR wasn't innocent. However, to suit your little fantasy scenario: no, I likely wouldn't be. I'd already be halfway to being lynched.

With his cf info revealed however, it paints you in a different light as you were sitting there claiming to be willing to put a hammer on a killer, but coming up with an excuse not to.

[Jalan]

Galain, on 09 May 2017 - 09:08 PM, said:

I am not switching. I think Osseric is best case presented. I hope we get a lynch but the cases on SR and Kilava I don't believe in. Maybe they are scum but I'd need something better than smooth play or joke voting.

Galain, on 10 May 2017 - 06:04 AM, said:

I have a feeling we lynched our BG. Silchas spent enough time talking about him from what I remember. I hope I am wrong. Also that end of day was a bit sketchy

Galain, on 10 May 2017 - 04:46 PM, said:

I think I need to be lynched as I don't want town to wifom at it at a later stage.I'll look for scum tomorrow and leave my thoughts then.

Yeah, Galain, with these three posts all put together I can agree with the sentiment in your last one. I've come to really dislike the - you should lynch me now to clear the water attitude (which is probe irony coming from me, I know).

[Merrid]

Path-Shaper, on 10 May 2017 - 01:43 PM, said:

Silchas Ruin was lynched. He was ItWasNom and Korbal Broach.

So the sense of humour was RP?

[Rashan]

What bothers me in your answer is really this: "what would my answer change?"

SR made a case on Kilava being "wishy-washy" and "too smooth" ™

I suggested I wasn't seeing that, but I'd do a re-read.

You were voting kilava at the time. Along with SR.
You claim you were willing to hammer SR. What would me coming back an hour before timeout and saying "look, I totally see why you think Kilava is scum!" would change at that point? Your response suggests you'd then try to turn the lynch off SR and onto Kilava.

Given the CF, that scenario raises almost as many questions as Galain's behaviour.

[Rashan]

@ Ampelas, obv

[Nimander Golit]

Rather lynch Jalan over that end of day 1 activity, personally.

Vote Jalan

The current wagon looks like a scummy damage control lynch.

[Nimander Golit]

Whatever. Weird voting tiles, yadda.

Vote Jalan

[Nimander Golit]

Rules*, not titles.

Shit.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 2. 30 hours and 8 minutes remaining

8 Players still alive: Ampelas, Denul, Galain, Jalan, Kilava, Merrid, Nimander Golit, Rashan

5 votes to lynch, 4 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Jalan ( Nimander Golit )

Players not voted: Ampelas, Denul, Galain, Jalan, Kilava, Merrid, Rashan

[Ampelas]

Rashan, on 10 May 2017 - 06:56 PM, said:

What bothers me in your answer is really this: "what would my answer change?"

SR made a case on Kilava being "wishy-washy" and "too smooth" ™

I suggested I wasn't seeing that, but I'd do a re-read.

You were voting kilava at the time. Along with SR.
You claim you were willing to hammer SR. What would me coming back an hour before timeout and saying "look, I totally see why you think Kilava is scum!" would change at that point? Your response suggests you'd then try to turn the lynch off SR and onto Kilava.

Given the CF, that scenario raises almost as many questions as Galain's behaviour.

You think I like being on the train with the killer? I was going for my typical thought process, that killers play middle of the road, stay out of trouble by being overall agreeable without having to commit anything. I saw Kilava as fitting the bill and stood by my case.

I am not sure what else to say? I brought up SR and Denul first thing, looking at both as symps. I then proceeded to search for someone not rocking the boat but not drawing attention as a low poster. If you know who I am, this is my MO.

[Jalan]

Ampelas, on 10 May 2017 - 08:19 PM, said:

Rashan, on 10 May 2017 - 06:56 PM, said:

What bothers me in your answer is really this: "what would my answer change?"

SR made a case on Kilava being "wishy-washy" and "too smooth" ™

I suggested I wasn't seeing that, but I'd do a re-read.

You were voting kilava at the time. Along with SR.
You claim you were willing to hammer SR. What would me coming back an hour before timeout and saying "look, I totally see why you think Kilava is scum!" would change at that point? Your response suggests you'd then try to turn the lynch off SR and onto Kilava.

Given the CF, that scenario raises almost as many questions as Galain's behaviour.

You think I like being on the train with the killer? I was going for my typical thought process, that killers play middle of the road, stay out of trouble by being overall agreeable without having to commit anything. I saw Kilava as fitting the bill and stood by my case.

I am not sure what else to say? I brought up SR and Denul first thing, looking at both as symps. I then proceeded to search for someone not rocking the boat but not drawing attention as a low poster. If you know who I am, this is my MO.

This is actually what is stopping me from placing a vote on you. I don't think you'd be stupid enough to be the only other one on a train with a partner if you were a killer.

[Rashan]

Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 08:29 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 10 May 2017 - 08:19 PM, said:

Rashan, on 10 May 2017 - 06:56 PM, said:

What bothers me in your answer is really this: "what would my answer change?"

SR made a case on Kilava being "wishy-washy" and "too smooth" ™

I suggested I wasn't seeing that, but I'd do a re-read.

You were voting kilava at the time. Along with SR.
You claim you were willing to hammer SR. What would me coming back an hour before timeout and saying "look, I totally see why you think Kilava is scum!" would change at that point? Your response suggests you'd then try to turn the lynch off SR and onto Kilava.

Given the CF, that scenario raises almost as many questions as Galain's behaviour.

You think I like being on the train with the killer? I was going for my typical thought process, that killers play middle of the road, stay out of trouble by being overall agreeable without having to commit anything. I saw Kilava as fitting the bill and stood by my case.

I am not sure what else to say? I brought up SR and Denul first thing, looking at both as symps. I then proceeded to search for someone not rocking the boat but not drawing attention as a low poster. If you know who I am, this is my MO.

This is actually what is stopping me from placing a vote on you. I don't think you'd be stupid enough to be the only other one on a train with a partner if you were a killer.

And what about Galain? What's the likelihood of "it's too blatant to be true" defense applying to both?

[Ampelas]

Well, regardless, I am almost done at work and then I will try to do another read through. I really want to see who SR plays with and who he ignores.

[Jalan]

Nimander Golit, on 10 May 2017 - 02:38 AM, said:

Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 01:39 AM, said:

I think the only non-scum possibility to explain his behavior is if he is the actual healer, but I don't think that's the case.

How does that thought process come into existence?If I was fakeclaiming, the "actual healer" would step up and cc me.I'd have lost a claim way against pretty much anyone today.That statement is absolute trash.

So... You do realize I had already said I thought your claim was genuine, right?

Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 01:23 AM, said:

Nimander Golit, on 10 May 2017 - 01:19 AM, said:

Merrid, on 09 May 2017 - 08:04 PM, said:

If you're gonna vote the claimed Healer you should only be doing it because you're the real Healer. Or, you know, they're being an arse.

Guilty.

However, you're being a logical arse. You're also pushing to get town to work together, which is something that we haven't done particularly well in a while.I don't think that I would have revealed in your shoes, but I do think that it has caused a crapton of discussion, and helped make scum stand out on D1.

Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 01:39 AM, said:

Silchas Ruin, on 09 May 2017 - 02:43 PM, said:

For the record I have never seen whatever movie it was and I don't remember it from the SImpsons, I know it from a song (where it's not "the loneliest")remove voteI don't get Nim's vote on Galain but I don't think me questioning everything Nimander does and I don't get leads anywhere or is much helpful so I'll just leave Nimander beI need to reread the but it seems like Kilava has managed to stay relatively low despite not being low-poster. Denul's non-commitment warrants attention but his play has not been that much different from mine so they're not that supicious to me.Galain, Rashan and Ampelas are all serious and sensible, maybe that's not such a bad place to look too. But I admit they all make sense in some way, but Ampelas is giving me the most tryhard feeling of them.I like Galain's vote on Osserc, although as Rashan points out they have too little posts for my liking, would like to hear more from them.

Yeah, the more I'm reading the more likely I find that SR is scum. The way he continues to take little jabs at Nim to attempt to discredit a non-cc'ed healer is rather worrisome. I think the only non-scum possibility to explain his behavior is if he is the actual healer, but I don't think that's the case.Beyond that though, SR is on thread a lot, attempting to direct the discussion. That makes me really nervous.Vote Silchas Ruin

I dont actually care of you leave your vote on me for the moment since you're the first vote and it's still early in D2, but you're barking up the wrong tree.

[Jalan]

Rashan, on 10 May 2017 - 08:35 PM, said:

Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 08:29 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 10 May 2017 - 08:19 PM, said:

Rashan, on 10 May 2017 - 06:56 PM, said:

What bothers me in your answer is really this: "what would my answer change?"

SR made a case on Kilava being "wishy-washy" and "too smooth" ™

I suggested I wasn't seeing that, but I'd do a re-read.

You were voting kilava at the time. Along with SR.
You claim you were willing to hammer SR. What would me coming back an hour before timeout and saying "look, I totally see why you think Kilava is scum!" would change at that point? Your response suggests you'd then try to turn the lynch off SR and onto Kilava.

Given the CF, that scenario raises almost as many questions as Galain's behaviour.

You think I like being on the train with the killer? I was going for my typical thought process, that killers play middle of the road, stay out of trouble by being overall agreeable without having to commit anything. I saw Kilava as fitting the bill and stood by my case.

I am not sure what else to say? I brought up SR and Denul first thing, looking at both as symps. I then proceeded to search for someone not rocking the boat but not drawing attention as a low poster. If you know who I am, this is my MO.

This is actually what is stopping me from placing a vote on you. I don't think you'd be stupid enough to be the only other one on a train with a partner if you were a killer.

And what about Galain? What's the likelihood of "it's too blatant to be true" defense applying to both?

Frankly, you could group my hammer into that clusterfuck as well.

The fact is that we're looking for 2 scum left in a group of 8 people. All 3 of us can't be scum.

Now, I'm going to pull a bit of meta here, but Nom has a tendency to like hiding messages to his partners in his posts. I'm hopping back to dig over his previous materials to see if he did it again with his symp. I think that's our best chance of finding our next member of that infamous trio.

[Merrid]

Just FYI all, I'm going to be low on posting chances for the next 20 hours or so.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 2. 28 hours and 55 minutes remaining

8 Players still alive: Ampelas, Denul, Galain, Jalan, Kilava, Merrid, Nimander Golit, Rashan

5 votes to lynch, 4 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Jalan ( Nimander Golit )

Players not voted: Ampelas, Denul, Galain, Jalan, Kilava, Merrid, Rashan

[Rashan]

Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 08:45 PM, said:

Rashan, on 10 May 2017 - 08:35 PM, said:

Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 08:29 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 10 May 2017 - 08:19 PM, said:

Rashan, on 10 May 2017 - 06:56 PM, said:

What bothers me in your answer is really this: "what would my answer change?"

SR made a case on Kilava being "wishy-washy" and "too smooth" ™

I suggested I wasn't seeing that, but I'd do a re-read.

You were voting kilava at the time. Along with SR.
You claim you were willing to hammer SR. What would me coming back an hour before timeout and saying "look, I totally see why you think Kilava is scum!" would change at that point? Your response suggests you'd then try to turn the lynch off SR and onto Kilava.

Given the CF, that scenario raises almost as many questions as Galain's behaviour.

You think I like being on the train with the killer? I was going for my typical thought process, that killers play middle of the road, stay out of trouble by being overall agreeable without having to commit anything. I saw Kilava as fitting the bill and stood by my case.

I am not sure what else to say? I brought up SR and Denul first thing, looking at both as symps. I then proceeded to search for someone not rocking the boat but not drawing attention as a low poster. If you know who I am, this is my MO.

This is actually what is stopping me from placing a vote on you. I don't think you'd be stupid enough to be the only other one on a train with a partner if you were a killer.

And what about Galain? What's the likelihood of "it's too blatant to be true" defense applying to both?

Frankly, you could group my hammer into that clusterfuck as well.

The fact is that we're looking for 2 scum left in a group of 8 people. All 3 of us can't be scum.

Now, I'm going to pull a bit of meta here, but Nom has a tendency to like hiding messages to his partners in his posts. I'm hopping back to dig over his previous materials to see if he did it again with his symp. I think that's our best chance of finding our next member of that infamous trio.

He DID try to get involved in that "numbers" song discussion, along with Denul... gah, that's another mess right there,

[Nimander Golit]

Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 08:37 PM, said:

Nimander Golit, on 10 May 2017 - 02:38 AM, said:

Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 01:39 AM, said:

I think the only non-scum possibility to explain his behavior is if he is the actual healer, but I don't think that's the case.

How does that thought process come into existence?If I was fakeclaiming, the "actual healer" would step up and cc me.I'd have lost a claim way against pretty much anyone today.That statement is absolute trash.

So... You do realize I had already said I thought your claim was genuine, right?

Note, he completely ignored the post that immediately follows the one he quoted.

Nimander Golit, on 10 May 2017 - 02:41 AM, said:

Not to mention the fact the scummy ass disclaimer at the end does nothing to explain how that abortion of an assumption came into being in the first place.

[Jalan]

Nimander Golit, on 10 May 2017 - 09:04 PM, said:

Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 08:37 PM, said:

Nimander Golit, on 10 May 2017 - 02:38 AM, said:

Jalan, on 10 May 2017 - 01:39 AM, said:

I think the only non-scum possibility to explain his behavior is if he is the actual healer, but I don't think that's the case.

How does that thought process come into existence?If I was fakeclaiming, the "actual healer" would step up and cc me.I'd have lost a claim way against pretty much anyone today.That statement is absolute trash.

So... You do realize I had already said I thought your claim was genuine, right?

Note, he completely ignored the post that immediately follows the one he quoted.

Nimander Golit, on 10 May 2017 - 02:41 AM, said:

Not to mention the fact the scummy ass disclaimer at the end does nothing to explain how that abortion of an assumption came into being in the first place.

*le sigh* You've obviously got a hard-on that is effecting your comprehension at the moment. I'm going to ignore you for the next few hours so it'll hopefully abate. If it lasts longer than 4 hours though, I'm going to have to advise that you see a doctor.