Kilava, on 09 May 2017 - 06:27 PM, said:
Ampelas, on 09 May 2017 - 06:19 PM, said:
Here is a sampling from Kilava's content. As I said early, he caught my attention as a little too, dare I say it, smooth.
Apparently you do dare to say it. So your case is that there's nothing to stick to me? Good case.
Quote
The second to last quote really cinches it for me. Isn't that what Kilava was doing up to that point. And the only vote is a case based on what he would do if he was scum?
No, it isn't what I was doing up to that point at all. I was engaging way more than you were, for instance.
And yes, that is my only vote so far. It's similar to Galain's vote on Osseric for playing like one scum played in the previous game. So what's the difference between me and Galain then in your view?
Since you're now mentioning this at least for the second time, the votes don't seem that similar to me.
While you vote Galain for posting and openly saying he won't be around anytime soon that you didn't believe
Kilava, on 08 May 2017 - 10:08 PM, said:
Galain, on 08 May 2017 - 07:23 PM, said:
Lots of posts, keep them coming. I will look forward to reading up in the morning and getting my teeth stuck into the game. I have not read any of it yet but it looks promising.
Just the kind of thing I would say when I HAVE read all the posts but don't want to interrupt town shouting at each other.
While Galain voted Osserc for only surface interest that he believes to be pretended and resemblance to a similar post fomr last game's scum, which doesn't resemble the post you voted Galain for at all.
Galain, on 09 May 2017 - 09:17 AM, said:
Osseric, on 08 May 2017 - 07:01 PM, said:
Back and catching up. I for one miss the dragonsecks.
I don't like Nimander's reveal, but without a counter I think we can believe him.
Why is Merrid in a twist over it?
This is the type of post I have come to associate with scum especially in a situation like this. Nonchalant acceptance of the reveal because there is no counter and a question aimed at Merrid's play without actually delving deeper into it.
Compare it with say, Denul's jokeyness, Silchas/Merrid's seriousness. This post by Osseric is lacking in town presence. 100% scum.
Galain, on 09 May 2017 - 11:55 AM, said:
Rise of the sorcerer last game, scum tell. Which I picked up on.
Nimander Golit, on 26 April 2017 - 01:32 PM, said:
Denul, on 26 April 2017 - 03:35 AM, said:
So there, two deaths, it's likely that Galain, at the very least, had a kill.
I personally believe his reveal, and am glad that he used the vig.
Now, let's see how fast you all jump on me today, right?
Mistake or something more? Merrid was the vig.
Are you suggesting Galain is scum?
See, they do not evolve their post, they do not push it, they do not engage in conversation in the day, and they give a suggestive place to look. Just like that post by Osseric.
Kilava, on 09 May 2017 - 06:27 PM, said:
Ampelas, on 09 May 2017 - 06:19 PM, said:
There isn't much interaction in regards to actual cases (as was pointed out when pressing him for an opinion on Merrid) and what SR may be referring to is the lack of commitment to what other people say (e.g. backing up or tearing down a lynch case). Yes, Kilava was very argumentative with Nim early on, but it was all speculation on mechanics. Nothing really focused on one person or another. Dodgy, even by his own standards I'd say.
vote Kilava
Egregious misinterpretation. A lack of commitment - if I do show it - is no bad thing on day 1. I'll be committing with my vote when I've settled on it. And besides, SR's vote and reasoning is nothing to do with what they stated - they simply voted me as OMGUS because I've been suggesting that I will vote for them, which was interesting in itself.
I voted you on the basis of my little reread, I already express my interest in you and mention the reread in my previous post that came before your vote.
Help
