[Ampelas]

Fuck fuck fuck. Sorry. I forgot about it all starting on Monday...

Here, 2nd to last? Jalan still has to check in right.

[Ampelas]

Ballsy reveal. I like the approach though and agree it would work nicely. And if it is a fake reveal, we can watch Nim for a time and see if he gives us clues to presumably his masters. Either way, Nim's "reveal" gives us an edge. We just need to focus on those around him and their responses. Rereading.

[Ampelas]

Denul, on 08 May 2017 - 02:45 PM, said:

Silchas Ruin, on 08 May 2017 - 02:41 PM, said:

One's a lonely number

Two's the first loser

Two can be as bad as one, it's the loneliest number since the number one - ber.

I wasted valuable time reading the roles and scenario.

Just a quick note, this was what first caught my attention. In a scenario with paired killers, anything saying "pair" or "two" immediately catches the eye. Two (killers) can be as bad as one (killer). Indeed.

[Galain]

Ampelas, on 09 May 2017 - 01:12 PM, said:

Denul, on 08 May 2017 - 02:45 PM, said:

Silchas Ruin, on 08 May 2017 - 02:41 PM, said:

One's a lonely number

Two's the first loser

Two can be as bad as one, it's the loneliest number since the number one - ber.

I wasted valuable time reading the roles and scenario.

Just a quick note, this was what first caught my attention. In a scenario with paired killers, anything saying "pair" or "two" immediately catches the eye. Two (killers) can be as bad as one (killer). Indeed.

So are you suggesting somebody was signalling?

[Ampelas]

Kilava, on 08 May 2017 - 04:08 PM, said:

Nimander Golit, on 08 May 2017 - 04:04 PM, said:

Kilava, on 08 May 2017 - 04:02 PM, said:

Nimander Golit, on 08 May 2017 - 03:58 PM, said:

Kilava, on 08 May 2017 - 03:54 PM, said:

For what it's worth, I like the gumption - really started the game proper off quickly!

I'm all about game breaking.

I don't always have the perfect answer, but that's why the rest of town is here... to help figure that stuff out.

lol, it's like going in the fridge and cupboards, throwing all the ingredients for dinner out all over the kitchen, and then saying, 'well, I've done my part!'

Just because you have the ingredients in front of you, doesn't mean they're being wasted.

No, but why am I always the one who has to clean up?




In any case, this could prove useful even without further reveals. Killers aren't now likely to take the risk of targetting you. Which leaves you free to do your thing if you are a healer.

Reading through, and what catches my eye is how people react to Nim. Kilava starts with a wtf and arguing against, then backs off and says it really gets the game going. This seems to be a good pattern to play both the cautious then amicable townie, someone who doesn't polarize to one side or the other just in case it attracts the wrong kind of attention.

Still reading. Just writing some of these thoughts out.

[Ampelas]

Galain, on 09 May 2017 - 01:26 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 09 May 2017 - 01:12 PM, said:

Denul, on 08 May 2017 - 02:45 PM, said:

Silchas Ruin, on 08 May 2017 - 02:41 PM, said:

One's a lonely number

Two's the first loser

Two can be as bad as one, it's the loneliest number since the number one - ber.

I wasted valuable time reading the roles and scenario.

Just a quick note, this was what first caught my attention. In a scenario with paired killers, anything saying "pair" or "two" immediately catches the eye. Two (killers) can be as bad as one (killer). Indeed.

So are you suggesting somebody was signalling?

Yes.

[Kruppe of Darujhistan]

Ampelas, on 09 May 2017 - 01:12 PM, said:

Denul, on 08 May 2017 - 02:45 PM, said:

Silchas Ruin, on 08 May 2017 - 02:41 PM, said:

One's a lonely number

Two's the first loser

Two can be as bad as one, it's the loneliest number since the number one - ber.

I wasted valuable time reading the roles and scenario.

Just a quick note, this was what first caught my attention. In a scenario with paired killers, anything saying "pair" or "two" immediately catches the eye. Two (killers) can be as bad as one (killer). Indeed.

Well, ya caught me. I wasn't just responding to the first line of a cheesy Three Dog Night song from the 70s with the second line to a cheesy [/i]Three Dog Night[/i] song from the 70s. I'm scum through-and-through; signaling my master in my second post of day 1. You, sir, are a Mafia genius.

[Ampelas]

Kilava, on 08 May 2017 - 04:55 PM, said:

Nimander Golit, on 08 May 2017 - 04:13 PM, said:

Any town that feels the need to discredit town through such insidious measures are playing directly against their win con.

So anyone who questions or criticises you is scum or working against town, because you're town?

And the rest of us know that for certain because...?

By that same logic, you accusing me of being scummy is scummy and/or acting against town, because, you know, I'm town myself.

Never like people clarifying they are town. Seems like someone playing the "town, we, us, etc" card to emphasize they aren't scum.

[Ampelas]

Kruppe of Darujhistan, on 09 May 2017 - 01:28 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 09 May 2017 - 01:12 PM, said:

Denul, on 08 May 2017 - 02:45 PM, said:

Silchas Ruin, on 08 May 2017 - 02:41 PM, said:

One's a lonely number

Two's the first loser

Two can be as bad as one, it's the loneliest number since the number one - ber.

I wasted valuable time reading the roles and scenario.

Just a quick note, this was what first caught my attention. In a scenario with paired killers, anything saying "pair" or "two" immediately catches the eye. Two (killers) can be as bad as one (killer). Indeed.

Well, ya caught me. I wasn't just responding to the first line of a cheesy Three Dog Night song from the 70s with the second line to a cheesy [/i]Three Dog Night[/i] song from the 70s. I'm scum through-and-through; signaling my master in my second post of day 1. You, sir, are a Mafia genius.

Out of character.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 1. 13 hours remaining

10 Players still alive: Ampelas, Denul, Galain, Jalan, Kilava, Merrid, Nimander Golit, Osseric, Rashan, Silchas Ruin

6 votes to lynch, 5 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Ampelas ( Merrid )
1 Vote for Osseric ( Galain )
1 Vote for Merrid ( Denul )
1 Vote for Silchas Ruin ( Nimander Golit )
1 Vote for Galain ( Kilava )
1 Vote for Nimander Golit ( Silchas Ruin )

Players not voted: Ampelas, Jalan, Osseric, Rashan

[Galain]

Ampelas, on 09 May 2017 - 01:28 PM, said:

Galain, on 09 May 2017 - 01:26 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 09 May 2017 - 01:12 PM, said:

Denul, on 08 May 2017 - 02:45 PM, said:

Silchas Ruin, on 08 May 2017 - 02:41 PM, said:

One's a lonely number

Two's the first loser

Two can be as bad as one, it's the loneliest number since the number one - ber.

I wasted valuable time reading the roles and scenario.

Just a quick note, this was what first caught my attention. In a scenario with paired killers, anything saying "pair" or "two" immediately catches the eye. Two (killers) can be as bad as one (killer). Indeed.

So are you suggesting somebody was signalling?

Yes.

Who to who?

[Galain]

Kruppe of Darujhistan, on 09 May 2017 - 01:28 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 09 May 2017 - 01:12 PM, said:

Denul, on 08 May 2017 - 02:45 PM, said:

Silchas Ruin, on 08 May 2017 - 02:41 PM, said:

One's a lonely number

Two's the first loser

Two can be as bad as one, it's the loneliest number since the number one - ber.

I wasted valuable time reading the roles and scenario.

Just a quick note, this was what first caught my attention. In a scenario with paired killers, anything saying "pair" or "two" immediately catches the eye. Two (killers) can be as bad as one (killer). Indeed.

Well, ya caught me. I wasn't just responding to the first line of a cheesy Three Dog Night song from the 70s with the second line to a cheesy [/i]Three Dog Night[/i] song from the 70s. I'm scum through-and-through; signaling my master in my second post of day 1. You, sir, are a Mafia genius.

this is quite defensive in reference to the post presented, did it even care for a comment?

[Rashan]

Galain, on 09 May 2017 - 09:28 AM, said:

So having read up I think we should believe Nim's reveal. I think Bodyguard should stay hidden and that we should lynch Osseric. He's my number one suspect, too much happening on thread for a post like his.

No comment on SR's behaviour? Hmmm

vote SR

Good morning everyone

[Galain]

Path-Shaper, on 09 May 2017 - 01:33 PM, said:

It is Day 1. 13 hours remaining

10 Players still alive: Ampelas, Denul, Galain, Jalan, Kilava, Merrid, Nimander Golit, Osseric, Rashan, Silchas Ruin

6 votes to lynch, 5 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Ampelas ( Merrid )
1 Vote for Osseric ( Galain )
1 Vote for Merrid ( Denul )
1 Vote for Silchas Ruin ( Nimander Golit )
1 Vote for Galain ( Kilava )
1 Vote for Nimander Golit ( Silchas Ruin )

Players not voted: Ampelas, Jalan, Osseric, Rashan

This is a good spread. It gets everyone involved, and every to have an opinion. Except Jalan who hasn't checked in, and scummy Osseric.

[Ampelas]

Galain, on 09 May 2017 - 01:40 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 09 May 2017 - 01:28 PM, said:

Galain, on 09 May 2017 - 01:26 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 09 May 2017 - 01:12 PM, said:

Denul, on 08 May 2017 - 02:45 PM, said:

Silchas Ruin, on 08 May 2017 - 02:41 PM, said:

One's a lonely number

Two's the first loser

Two can be as bad as one, it's the loneliest number since the number one - ber.

I wasted valuable time reading the roles and scenario.

Just a quick note, this was what first caught my attention. In a scenario with paired killers, anything saying "pair" or "two" immediately catches the eye. Two (killers) can be as bad as one (killer). Indeed.

So are you suggesting somebody was signalling?

Yes.

Who to who?

I am pointing out a signaler, which means that maybe SR or Denul are trying to let their masters know they are a symp. Comments early on with relation to scum roles (eg. using a reference to 2 and dangerous in a paired scum game) stand out to a small extent and may allow the connection to be made. Mostly just caught my eye. I will watch those two, but not necessarily go after them. And pointing this out may bring to light other pertinent interactions.

[Rashan]

Kruppe of Darujhistan, on 09 May 2017 - 01:28 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 09 May 2017 - 01:12 PM, said:

Denul, on 08 May 2017 - 02:45 PM, said:

Silchas Ruin, on 08 May 2017 - 02:41 PM, said:

One's a lonely number

Two's the first loser

Two can be as bad as one, it's the loneliest number since the number one - ber.

I wasted valuable time reading the roles and scenario.

Just a quick note, this was what first caught my attention. In a scenario with paired killers, anything saying "pair" or "two" immediately catches the eye. Two (killers) can be as bad as one (killer). Indeed.

Well, ya caught me. I wasn't just responding to the first line of a cheesy Three Dog Night song from the 70s with the second line to a cheesy [/i]Three Dog Night[/i] song from the 70s. I'm scum through-and-through; signaling my master in my second post of day 1. You, sir, are a Mafia genius.

The line is actually "the loneliest number". Thank you, Simpsons for teaching me that.

Your explanation is thus found lacking.

[Galain]

Rashan, on 09 May 2017 - 01:43 PM, said:

Galain, on 09 May 2017 - 09:28 AM, said:

So having read up I think we should believe Nim's reveal. I think Bodyguard should stay hidden and that we should lynch Osseric. He's my number one suspect, too much happening on thread for a post like his.

No comment on SR's behaviour? Hmmm

vote SR

Good morning everyone

Not yet no. Other people are doing that. Are you asking me for my opinion on SR? Your post could easily have said, no comment on Kilava's behaviour, or no comment on Rashan's behaviour (I am aware you are Rashan ), so what makes you think SR is more important for me to look at than Osseric?

[Rashan]

Galain, on 09 May 2017 - 01:46 PM, said:

Rashan, on 09 May 2017 - 01:43 PM, said:

Galain, on 09 May 2017 - 09:28 AM, said:

So having read up I think we should believe Nim's reveal. I think Bodyguard should stay hidden and that we should lynch Osseric. He's my number one suspect, too much happening on thread for a post like his.

No comment on SR's behaviour? Hmmm

vote SR

Good morning everyone

Not yet no. Other people are doing that. Are you asking me for my opinion on SR? Your post could easily have said, no comment on Kilava's behaviour, or no comment on Rashan's behaviour (I am aware you are Rashan ), so what makes you think SR is more important for me to look at than Osseric?

He has a vote on him. I was leaning towards voting him in my breakdown of the game so far yesterday. he voted a revealed healer . Are none of these things worthy of a comment at the end of a re-read?

[Rashan]

Anyhow, deadline days today and tomorrow, so gotta get back to the grind. I'll be checking up sporadically, but got a bunch of writing to do.

[Denul]

Sorry about the alt reveal.

@ Ampelas. I know the lyric (from listening to the radio in the 70s and not from the Simpsons) and it was close enough to reference the song.Go bark up some other tree.