Rashan, on 11 May 2017 - 05:00 PM, said:
Yeah, no chance in hell i'm revealing today.
By not revealing, I'm keeping his dumb ass free of NKs, because the natural assumption is that I'll be guarding him.
And who the fuck would counter to show up as symp?
Too many flaws to list with this suggestion.
It's best to assume we don't have a BG, and let him try to do his thing. How is that not obvious?
This here has a LOT to do with site meta. House is from MafiaScum, and the only game I ever played over there, I called people out for making drive by votes without a case, which had basically everyone jumping down my throat so hard that I had to reveal as healer on Day 1 to avoid being lynched. They said outright that was a fair trade, which I think is a load of shit. I then spent the rest of Day 1 arguing like crazy with anyone that tried to drop votes without cases, or for others who jumped onto trains without reasons and stuff like that, and got completely shut down over and over again.
They just play Mafia different over there.
A couple things that I've noticed this game that House has done that we usually do not accept around here:
1) Healer reveal on Day 1 along with the suggestion of the BG reveal. Though in this case it could have been smart, it's not something that we do around here.
Usually we save reveals as last hopes to prevent town from lynching us, or at least later in the game.
2) These posts right here:
Nimander Golit, on 11 May 2017 - 12:44 AM, said:
I've stated my thoughts.
Cases are for scum.
Nimander Golit, on 11 May 2017 - 04:38 PM, said:
Cases are used car sales pitches.
Everybody has the same information on the same players. If we are being up front and open on our thoughts in every post, we shouldn't need a "case" to summarize those thoughts to empower the lazy to lean on our work product.
On these forums, we use cases to make decisions. You're not likely to get much support for any wagons you want to lead unless you give everyone the information you used to get to that point. Ment actually made a great comment to rebut this:
Rashan, on 11 May 2017 - 04:51 PM, said:
Cases point out inconsistencies in players' behaviour. Those inconsistencies are what suggests they are acting with ulterior motives or are privy to extra info that an average RI does not possess.
Unless you possess a photoiedetic memory, good luck recalling every post made over a 15 page game thread.
Simply saying "so and so is scum" (which you are not doing, to be fair- you are focused on one post, and you seem intent to keep hammering at it until Jalan is lynched) is far less persuading then providing your thought process as to why you arrive at a particular conclusion as to the merits of each suspect being scum. Often this thought process involves quoting the player's post to point out inconsistencies- ergo, "cases" .
Once again, mafia is a team game. Just because you are proven town, does not automatically make you right all the time. You are still required to convince others that your suggestion merit the most attention, in order to arrive at a majority needed for a lynch.
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.