[Tulas Shorn]

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 08:42 AM, said:

Cloak and daggers early on I see. You know what the problem is going to be with this game, hardly any lynches, because the votes will be split in two and teams will be highly disadvantaged if they lynch one of their own.

Is that how you would prefer to play the game? You calling it a problem suggests that not, if that's right perhaps others do neither?

There's also the survivor

[Okaros]

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 07:24 AM, said:

Kaschan, on 21 November 2016 - 11:46 PM, said:

Tulas Shorn, on 21 November 2016 - 10:08 PM, said:

sun is yellow

pineapple

huh?

Okaros, on 22 November 2016 - 06:55 AM, said:

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 06:51 AM, said:

Okaros, on 22 November 2016 - 06:42 AM, said:

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 05:52 AM, said:

Okaros, on 22 November 2016 - 04:27 AM, said:

Tulas Shorn, on 21 November 2016 - 10:08 PM, said:

remove vote

sun is yellow

pineapple

So how many beers?

To be precise, none

Interestingly the firetruck didn't cause such reactions, maybe I hit a nerve with the remove?

Actually I did. What's with the yellow and red theme?

Probably that Trake's and Anthras's avatar colour schemes hurt my eyes. And luckily I'm on phone and don't have to see Pallid's one yet closely but it looks ridiculous already.

Not a fan of the flaming tiger, eh?

You are so nice and gray yourself.

But why make random one-word color comments that seem incoherent at first?

Ah ofcourse you're getting at Ironman signalling

I was making fun of Trake, no point in trying to convince you the colour scheme wasn't deliberate, go on and vote wherever you want based on that if you think it was then

Edit: messed up quoting

Mmmm to be perfectly honest, I had not settled on Ironman, I always thought he was more maroonish black and gold...

[Okaros]

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 08:42 AM, said:

Cloak and daggers early on I see. You know what the problem is going to be with this game, hardly any lynches, because the votes will be split in two and teams will be highly disadvantaged if they lynch one of their own.

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 09:10 AM, said:

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 08:42 AM, said:

Cloak and daggers early on I see. You know what the problem is going to be with this game, hardly any lynches, because the votes will be split in two and teams will be highly disadvantaged if they lynch one of their own.

Is that how you would prefer to play the game? You calling it a problem suggests that not, if that's right perhaps others do neither?

There's also the survivor

Are both of you assuming that the teams will know themselves?

[Tulas Shorn]

Okaros, on 22 November 2016 - 09:27 AM, said:

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 08:42 AM, said:

Cloak and daggers early on I see. You know what the problem is going to be with this game, hardly any lynches, because the votes will be split in two and teams will be highly disadvantaged if they lynch one of their own.

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 09:10 AM, said:

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 08:42 AM, said:

Cloak and daggers early on I see. You know what the problem is going to be with this game, hardly any lynches, because the votes will be split in two and teams will be highly disadvantaged if they lynch one of their own.

Is that how you would prefer to play the game? You calling it a problem suggests that not, if that's right perhaps others do neither?

There's also the survivor

Are both of you assuming that the teams will know themselves?

Everyone knows their leaders, leaders don't know anyone (game rules). I think Trake is implying everyone will refuse to vote unless the individual they're intending to vote for will be obviously member of one of the factions, in which case the faction of which he is member just won't vote them resulting in stagnation.

[Trake]

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 09:10 AM, said:

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 08:42 AM, said:

Cloak and daggers early on I see. You know what the problem is going to be with this game, hardly any lynches, because the votes will be split in two and teams will be highly disadvantaged if they lynch one of their own.

Is that how you would prefer to play the game? You calling it a problem suggests that not, if that's right perhaps others do neither?

There's also the survivor

Well the Survivor may get the party started, votes split 5 vs 5 and he pops on and sinks a player. I'd like to lynch the other team to death if I knew who they were and we can get their own members to lynch them.

We are on the same team though aren't we Tulas? Aren't we?

[Trake]

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 09:41 AM, said:

Okaros, on 22 November 2016 - 09:27 AM, said:

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 08:42 AM, said:

Cloak and daggers early on I see. You know what the problem is going to be with this game, hardly any lynches, because the votes will be split in two and teams will be highly disadvantaged if they lynch one of their own.

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 09:10 AM, said:

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 08:42 AM, said:

Cloak and daggers early on I see. You know what the problem is going to be with this game, hardly any lynches, because the votes will be split in two and teams will be highly disadvantaged if they lynch one of their own.

Is that how you would prefer to play the game? You calling it a problem suggests that not, if that's right perhaps others do neither?

There's also the survivor

Are both of you assuming that the teams will know themselves?

Everyone knows their leaders, leaders don't know anyone (game rules). I think Trake is implying everyone will refuse to vote unless the individual they're intending to vote for will be obviously member of one of the factions, in which case the faction of which he is member just won't vote them resulting in stagnation.

Yes this.

I have a small inkling on two players at the moment, so I guess the more people vote, the more comfortable you'll be whether a player is on your team or not. The problem then is going to convince 5 others that they are not on your team or theirs!

[Tulas Shorn]

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 09:44 AM, said:

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 09:10 AM, said:

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 08:42 AM, said:

Cloak and daggers early on I see. You know what the problem is going to be with this game, hardly any lynches, because the votes will be split in two and teams will be highly disadvantaged if they lynch one of their own.

Is that how you would prefer to play the game? You calling it a problem suggests that not, if that's right perhaps others do neither?

There's also the survivor

Well the Survivor may get the party started, votes split 5 vs 5 and he pops on and sinks a player. I'd like to lynch the other team to death if I knew who they were and we can get their own members to lynch them.

We are on the same team though aren't we Tulas? Aren't we?

I thought we're all just bits of Abyss's shattered soul anyway?

No point in those speculation, I guess we shall see after this day.

[Trake]

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 10:50 AM, said:

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 09:44 AM, said:

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 09:10 AM, said:

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 08:42 AM, said:

Cloak and daggers early on I see. You know what the problem is going to be with this game, hardly any lynches, because the votes will be split in two and teams will be highly disadvantaged if they lynch one of their own.

Is that how you would prefer to play the game? You calling it a problem suggests that not, if that's right perhaps others do neither?

There's also the survivor

Well the Survivor may get the party started, votes split 5 vs 5 and he pops on and sinks a player. I'd like to lynch the other team to death if I knew who they were and we can get their own members to lynch them.

We are on the same team though aren't we Tulas? Aren't we?

I thought we're all just bits of Abyss's shattered soul anyway?

No point in those speculation, I guess we shall see after this day.

who is your favourite for the lynch so far?

[Tulas Shorn]

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 10:52 AM, said:

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 10:50 AM, said:

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 09:44 AM, said:

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 09:10 AM, said:

Trake, on 22 November 2016 - 08:42 AM, said:

Cloak and daggers early on I see. You know what the problem is going to be with this game, hardly any lynches, because the votes will be split in two and teams will be highly disadvantaged if they lynch one of their own.

Is that how you would prefer to play the game? You calling it a problem suggests that not, if that's right perhaps others do neither?

There's also the survivor

Well the Survivor may get the party started, votes split 5 vs 5 and he pops on and sinks a player. I'd like to lynch the other team to death if I knew who they were and we can get their own members to lynch them.

We are on the same team though aren't we Tulas? Aren't we?

I thought we're all just bits of Abyss's shattered soul anyway?

No point in those speculation, I guess we shall see after this day.

who is your favourite for the lynch so far?

Over half the players

Yeah my problem with the stagnation theory of yours is I'm not really opposed to lynching a player whose affiliation is unclear to me because the scenario you painted would just be boring

[Tulas Shorn]

Pallid, on 21 November 2016 - 11:50 PM, said:

Trake, on 21 November 2016 - 09:00 PM, said:

remove vote

Kaschan and co haven't checked in yet.

I'll vote again when we have a full deck.

you must be on Cap's team. The tech-heads definitely aren't playing with a full deck.

I don't get this. Apparently there's some "full deck" reference that rocketed just above my head?

[Alkend]

Morning, everyone. Runnin late for work, because transit.

On topic: there's usually some early leader signalling/ fake signalling that leads everyone to conclude "person X can't b on my team", followed by the semi-random lynch of X. Then night actions happen, and the people start taking stock of the situation Day 2.

[Iparth Erule]

I immediately took it for Iron Man signalling. The supplied "explanation" does not compute. Could easily be a ruse, too. A risky move either way. I'm either distressed or pleased. Am I distressed or pleased? Why, yes, I am. Or not.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 1. 13 hours and 29 minutes remaining

11 Players still alive: Alkend, Anthras, D'riss, Gamelon, Iparth Erule, Kaschan, Okaros, Pallid, Sorrit, Trake, Tulas Shorn

6 votes to lynch, 6 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Trake ( Anthras )

Players not voted: Alkend, D'riss, Gamelon, Iparth Erule, Kaschan, Okaros, Pallid, Sorrit, Trake, Tulas Shorn

[Iparth Erule]

Tulas Shorn, on 22 November 2016 - 12:04 PM, said:

Pallid, on 21 November 2016 - 11:50 PM, said:

Trake, on 21 November 2016 - 09:00 PM, said:

remove vote

Kaschan and co haven't checked in yet.

I'll vote again when we have a full deck.

you must be on Cap's team. The tech-heads definitely aren't playing with a full deck.

I don't get this. Apparently there's some "full deck" reference that rocketed just above my head?

Not operating with a full deck.


A few bricks short of a load.


The lights are on but no one is home.


Mentally deficient, that sort of thing. You savvy now?

[Alkend]

Hmm

Fire truck

Tony stark

They have same number of syllables, same number of letters, AND both end with a "K"

Coincidence? I think not!

[Trake]

So much potential signalling I would not know where to start. I have my suspicions though.

[Gamelon]

Was there a fire truck in the airport scene? Will need to rewatch when I'm home.

Any excuse to watch that scene is alright.

[Gamelon]

Iparth Erule, on 22 November 2016 - 02:29 PM, said:

I immediately took it for Iron Man signalling. The supplied "explanation" does not compute. Could easily be a ruse, too. A risky move either way. I'm either distressed or pleased. Am I distressed or pleased? Why, yes, I am. Or not.

Is it too early to be calling people out for WIFOMing?

[Iparth Erule]

Gamelon, on 22 November 2016 - 03:53 PM, said:

Iparth Erule, on 22 November 2016 - 02:29 PM, said:

I immediately took it for Iron Man signalling. The supplied "explanation" does not compute. Could easily be a ruse, too. A risky move either way. I'm either distressed or pleased. Am I distressed or pleased? Why, yes, I am. Or not.

Is it too early to be calling people out for WIFOMing?

Hmm. Rhetorical question. That could be any and all Marvel characters. You're going to need to be more specific with your signalling.

[Iparth Erule]

Vote Tulas Shorn