[Anthras]

After that little exchange I'd be happy to vote for Okaros too.

However I can't help but consider it to be an attempt at deflecting from the root point of voting for Sorrit. You're so keen for people to vote Sorrit you really should put your money where your mouth is.

[D'riss]

Anthras, on 02 December 2016 - 10:53 AM, said:

After that little exchange I'd be happy to vote for Okaros too.

However I can't help but consider it to be an attempt at deflecting from the root point of voting for Sorrit. You're so keen for people to vote Sorrit you really should put your money where your mouth is.

I think you need to go back and reread Alkend yesterday which may clear things up for you. I would definitely vote for Sorrit.

Or perhaps someone else could helpfully enlighten you.

[Anthras]

D, on 02 December 2016 - 12:21 PM, said:

Anthras, on 02 December 2016 - 10:53 AM, said:

After that little exchange I'd be happy to vote for Okaros too.

However I can't help but consider it to be an attempt at deflecting from the root point of voting for Sorrit. You're so keen for people to vote Sorrit you really should put your money where your mouth is.

I think you need to go back and reread Alkend yesterday which may clear things up for you. I would definitely vote for Sorrit.

Or perhaps someone else could helpfully enlighten you.

I am aware of what you are implying. I understand that you would vote for Sorrit

I fully grasped what you were implying the first time you hinted at it thank you

The voting comment was directed towards Okaros

Is that clear for you?

[D'riss]

Anthras, on 02 December 2016 - 12:51 PM, said:

D, on 02 December 2016 - 12:21 PM, said:

Anthras, on 02 December 2016 - 10:53 AM, said:

After that little exchange I'd be happy to vote for Okaros too.

However I can't help but consider it to be an attempt at deflecting from the root point of voting for Sorrit. You're so keen for people to vote Sorrit you really should put your money where your mouth is.

I think you need to go back and reread Alkend yesterday which may clear things up for you. I would definitely vote for Sorrit.

Or perhaps someone else could helpfully enlighten you.

I am aware of what you are implying. I understand that you would vote for Sorrit

I fully grasped what you were implying the first time you hinted at it thank you

The voting comment was directed towards Okaros

Is that clear for you?

It is now Relieved to understand that you're not as dumb as Okaros hopes you are.

[Gamelon]

Huh, that puts us in an interesting position. If D'riss is telling the truth and is on team IM - a likely scenario but still not something I would bet money or body parts on - then it's parity and neither side has the numbers. A lynch in that scenario would be unlikely.

I get the suspicion behind Okaros now and that exchange with D'riss only makes it stronger. But if the idea is that Okaros tries to deflect from Sorrit, I feel like we're better off lynching Sorrit.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 4. 12 hours and 41 minutes remaining

7 Players still alive: Anthras, D'riss, Gamelon, Kaschan, Okaros, Pallid, Sorrit

4 votes to lynch, 4 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Pallid ( Okaros )
1 Vote for Sorrit ( Anthras )

Players not voted: D'riss, Gamelon, Kaschan, Pallid, Sorrit

[Okaros]

Look, my root objection to voting Sorrit remains the same - IE voting him as an indication makes 0 teamplay sense.

That is why my vote is on Pallid. He has been unnaturally quiet, and frankly I think he is a very good candidate for Captain America who has dropped into a nice little foxhole now that the heat is on him.

[Gamelon]

Is the freeze kicking in at timeout or before? If at timeout then I will not be available and I will need to put in my vote in about an hour or two.

At this point I'm leaning strongly towards Sorrit because Ment/meta-driven reasons I mentioned earlier. But Pallid really annoys me with how quite they are and I am tempted to go down that route.

[Sorrit]

did a reread. driss is trying to lead the whole thread around by the nose while avoiding actually adding content. aside from his vote for me, his 2 posts of greatest contribution are about secret hitler. very smooth, not ruffling any feathers. every other post of his is a one-liner or a joke. its actually pretty subtle because even his exchange with okaros just now has no content it's just more waving "vote sorrit" signs (he still refused to explain his vote reasoning when I asked him directly even). even looking at non-posters like anthras and pallid, driss stands out to me the most

i'd vote driss, but standard sob story, quote P-S and explain, etc etc etc

[D'riss]

Sorrit, on 02 December 2016 - 04:30 PM, said:

did a reread. driss is trying to lead the whole thread around by the nose while avoiding actually adding content. aside from his vote for me, his 2 posts of greatest contribution are about secret hitler. very smooth, not ruffling any feathers. every other post of his is a one-liner or a joke. its actually pretty subtle because even his exchange with okaros just now has no content it's just more waving "vote sorrit" signs (he still refused to explain his vote reasoning when I asked him directly even). even looking at non-posters like anthras and pallid, driss stands out to me the most

i'd vote driss, but standard sob story, quote P-S and explain, etc etc etc

You're absolutely right, if this was a town-scum game I would be scum. Unfortunately for you, it isn't. Making your post 'analysis' entirely irrelevant.

[Sorrit]

see? again with the no-content 1-liners. very convincing

also I wasn't implying you were scum....very much something else entirely. interesting that you are so jumpy...

[Gamelon]

I might not be available anymore today and will certainly not be sober anyway, so leaving my vote. I gave it some more thought and it's Pallid for laying too low. Right now I think Sorrit is team cap, but Pallid might be Cap himself.

vote Pallid

[D'riss]

Sorrit, on 02 December 2016 - 04:55 PM, said:

see? again with the no-content 1-liners. very convincing

also I wasn't implying you were scum....very much something else entirely. interesting that you are so jumpy...

Oh yeah, so what's that then? This reminds me of the other day when you were like 'oh Alkend said something that made me think of something but it will have to wait till more people say something' - and then you said nothing

And lol, I respond and call out your nonsense post for what it is and I'm jumpy? I think you need to take a look back at your own replies to Alkend to really see what 'jumpy' is.

[Sorrit]

D, on 02 December 2016 - 06:13 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 02 December 2016 - 04:55 PM, said:

see? again with the no-content 1-liners. very convincing

also I wasn't implying you were scum....very much something else entirely. interesting that you are so jumpy...

Oh yeah, so what's that then? This reminds me of the other day when you were like 'oh Alkend said something that made me think of something but it will have to wait till more people say something' - and then you said nothing

And lol, I respond and call out your nonsense post for what it is and I'm jumpy? I think you need to take a look back at your own replies to Alkend to really see what 'jumpy' is.

this post is nonsense, just go reread your own posts to see why

[D'riss]

Sorrit, on 02 December 2016 - 06:29 PM, said:

D, on 02 December 2016 - 06:13 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 02 December 2016 - 04:55 PM, said:

see? again with the no-content 1-liners. very convincing

also I wasn't implying you were scum....very much something else entirely. interesting that you are so jumpy...

Oh yeah, so what's that then? This reminds me of the other day when you were like 'oh Alkend said something that made me think of something but it will have to wait till more people say something' - and then you said nothing

And lol, I respond and call out your nonsense post for what it is and I'm jumpy? I think you need to take a look back at your own replies to Alkend to really see what 'jumpy' is.

this post is nonsense, just go reread your own posts to see why

Hahahahaha!

"No, YOU smell!"

[Sorrit]

[Anthras]

Sorrit, on 02 December 2016 - 04:30 PM, said:

i'd vote driss, but standard sob story, quote P-S and explain, etc etc etc

Two of you not able to vote? Taking the piss a little there aren't you?

[Anthras]

Anthras, on 02 December 2016 - 07:55 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 02 December 2016 - 04:30 PM, said:

i'd vote driss, but standard sob story, quote P-S and explain, etc etc etc

Two of you not able to vote? Taking the piss a little there aren't you?

To be a little more clear, in a two faction game having two people who cannot vote (when there was only one yesterday too...) is game breaking. We can't lynch a leader and will struggle with anyone else. So it's NAs to decide the game?

[Anthras]

Day 2 and no-one claimed to not be able to vote:

Path-Shaper, on 29 November 2016 - 02:58 PM, said:

It is Day 2. 1 hour and 15 minutes since time out

Players not voted: Alkend, Anthras

I missed it and Alkend hadn't made a claim then although he didn't actually put a vote down. We both voted on Day 1 BTW

Path-Shaper, on 01 December 2016 - 03:01 PM, said:

It is Day 3. 11 hours and 33 minutes since time out

Players not voted: Alkend, Anthras, Kaschan, Pallid

Alkend had no-voting made clear by PS on thread. I had no such restriction. Kaschan, Pallid, did you?

[Path-Shaper]

Just a reminder that reveals of any kind are not allowed.

The only reason I cleared up the issue for Alkend is because I made a mistake during resolution, and he had already voted that day, so I had to explain why he was not being added to the vote counts.

If someone can't vote, they are not allowed to just say so on thread.