[Anomandaris]

Omtose, on 06 October 2015 - 05:50 AM, said:

Awake again, no dragon secks? You've changed.
I am disapoint

I asked, no one wanted.

But by now that's obvious. So, you get no lizard porn. What do you want now?

[Demelain]

Awake again.

Not much happened, yet:

So far, we have a bit of talk on roles, but nothing too specific;

A very early low/no post vote on Liosan by Emurlahn (Why? As stated, it was very early and no posters will experience PS' wrath);

Joke-vote for Omtose;

and lack of dragon libido.

[Ryllandaras]

Emurlahn, on 05 October 2015 - 07:55 PM, said:

No poster hunt:


Vote Liosan

That is a new one. "No poster hunt"

It made me chuckle when reading through.

Voting someone early into day one when they have not posted is harsh.

I do not know what to think of this at the moment.

It could be a signal.

It could be a fake signal.

It could be a move to get the game going, either with him posting more or everyone talking about it. The problem I am having is, why him over the other non posters?

Edit: no to know

This post has been edited by Ryllandaras: 06 October 2015 - 07:41 AM

[Anomandaris]

Ryllandaras, on 06 October 2015 - 07:40 AM, said:

Emurlahn, on 05 October 2015 - 07:55 PM, said:

No poster hunt:


Vote Liosan

That is a new one. "No poster hunt"

It made me chuckle when reading through.

Voting someone early into day one when they have not posted is harsh.

I do not know what to think of this at the moment.

It could be a signal.

It could be a fake signal.

It could be a move to get the game going, either with him posting more or everyone talking about it. The problem I am having is, why him over the other non posters?

Edit: no to know

That could have been a paragraph.

[Omtose]

Ryllandaras, on 06 October 2015 - 07:40 AM, said:

Emurlahn, on 05 October 2015 - 07:55 PM, said:

No poster hunt:


Vote Liosan

That is a new one. "No poster hunt"

It made me chuckle when reading through.

Voting someone early into day one when they have not posted is harsh.

I do not know what to think of this at the moment.

It could be a signal.

It could be a fake signal.

It could be a move to get the game going, either with him posting more or everyone talking about it. The problem I am having is, why him over the other non posters?

Edit: no to know

vote rhyllandaras

This post is waffling pointless nonsense the kind of post that show participation but adds zero, the kind if floating past sort of contributing crap I would throw out if I was a killer

[Aparal Forge]

Mentioning signalling maybe a simple red herring. Signalling related discussion usually go nowhere. If there are plural scum as seems very likely they probably are in internal communication. No symp worth his salt is going to waste his role by getting caught out signalling early on day 1.

[Anomandaris]

Aparal Forge, on 06 October 2015 - 08:32 AM, said:

Mentioning signalling maybe a simple red herring. Signalling related discussion usually go nowhere. If there are plural scum as seems very likely they probably are in internal communication. No symp worth his salt is going to waste his role by getting caught out signalling early on day 1.

You give symps far too much credit. Most of them have it as their first symp role. Their belief in their leeway is their downfall for most new ones.

[Ryllandaras]

Aparal Forge, on 06 October 2015 - 08:32 AM, said:

Mentioning signalling maybe a simple red herring. Signalling related discussion usually go nowhere. If there are plural scum as seems very likely they probably are in internal communication. No symp worth his salt is going to waste his role by getting caught out signalling early on day 1.

That is the least likely likely option but I do not like the vote for a non poster so early in the game. I think that Emur is a symp, and this was misdirection. Definitely something to look out for.

[Omtose]

Pot calling the kettle black there, I don't believe in symp hunting, or trying to paint someone as a symp, it plays into the killers hands, if an inno dies 'he was a symp anyway'
Blegh

[Ryllandaras]

Omtose, on 06 October 2015 - 10:01 AM, said:

Pot calling the kettle black there, I don't believe in symp hunting, or trying to paint someone as a symp, it plays into the killers hands, if an inno dies 'he was a symp anyway'
Blegh

Why are you defending Emurlahn this much? I'm not even voting him, nothing else has jumped out that much, I just find his vote the oddest thing so far.

[Kadagar Fant]

21 hours in and still no Monok Ochem or Liosan. That really irks me.

On another note, Omfose's vote for Ryllandsras after he voted Emurlahn does look a bit sympish.

[Fanderay]

Im curious as to what emurlahn has to say. Not quite sure what the rationale is for going for no poster espcially so early into the game. I also don't think any of our mafia rookies are foolish enough to make a move that would paint a giant bullseye on them so early by mistake.

Day 1 lynches don't usually occur and even if they do they tend not to have the greatest accuracy. Could be emurlahns the symp, hes betting on us not lynching him, and as the days go on were always going to be stuck go back to emurlahn and itll split votes creating the kind of scenario scum could manipulate.

[Omtose]

Where exactly am I defending anyone Ryll? Bit of a stretch and reach with only one vote on you old bean, I think you need further attention

[Fanderay]

Aparal Forge, on 06 October 2015 - 08:32 AM, said:

Mentioning signalling maybe a simple red herring. Signalling related discussion usually go nowhere. If there are plural scum as seems very likely they probably are in internal communication. No symp worth his salt is going to waste his role by getting caught out signalling early on day 1.

i've been in quite a few games where talk of signalling just gets people into weird tangents and gets RIs killed

[Ryllandaras]

Omtose, on 06 October 2015 - 12:46 PM, said:

Where exactly am I defending anyone Ryll? Bit of a stretch and reach with only one vote on you old bean, I think you need further attention

Both of my posts point to something fishy with Emurs vote of Liosan and on the first one you vote me and on the second you call bullshit on painting anyone as a symp. Such hard on for another player this early.

[Ryllandaras]

In fact
vote Emurlahn

Omtose is reacting to something. Could it be Emur is actually scum?

[Emurlahn]

Ryllandaras, on 06 October 2015 - 07:40 AM, said:

Emurlahn, on 05 October 2015 - 07:55 PM, said:

No poster hunt:


Vote Liosan

That is a new one. "No poster hunt"

It made me chuckle when reading through.

Voting someone early into day one when they have not posted is harsh.

I do not know what to think of this at the moment.

It could be a signal.

It could be a fake signal.

It could be a move to get the game going, either with him posting more or everyone talking about it. The problem I am having is, why him over the other non posters?

Edit: no to know

Voting for a no/low poster seemed like a more microscopically better choice than anything else yesterday.
Why him over the others? Alphabetically first.

[Ryllandaras]

Emurlahn, on 06 October 2015 - 02:42 PM, said:

Ryllandaras, on 06 October 2015 - 07:40 AM, said:

Emurlahn, on 05 October 2015 - 07:55 PM, said:

No poster hunt:


Vote Liosan

That is a new one. "No poster hunt"

It made me chuckle when reading through.

Voting someone early into day one when they have not posted is harsh.

I do not know what to think of this at the moment.

It could be a signal.

It could be a fake signal.

It could be a move to get the game going, either with him posting more or everyone talking about it. The problem I am having is, why him over the other non posters?

Edit: no to know

Voting for a no/low poster seemed like a more microscopically better choice than anything else yesterday.
Why him over the others? Alphabetically first.

So it was a serious vote?

Either day one ends without them posting and they are modkilled, or they post more and you remove your vote. Seems like a waste of a vote to me unless you had other motivations?

[Demelain]

So, basically, a little of 12 hours remaining, if I did the math right.

First of all, I also think that symp isn't an easy role to play, especially for new players, so I agree with Anomandaris that we shouldn't give the symp too much credit.

I agree with Fanderay that talk of signalling usually doesn't lead to much or much good. That doesn't change the fact that voting for someone who hasn't posted yet just four hours into game is odd, especially when you take into account mod kills. It almost looks like a desperate attempt at emulating typical early town behaviour of going after or speculation about [l]low[/i] posters. However, this early in the game, accompanied with a vote and directed to a no, rather than a low poster? I don't know what it was.

However, Ryll certainly has an opinion about it:

Ryllandaras, on 06 October 2015 - 08:45 AM, said:

I think that Emur is a symp, and this was misdirection. Definitely something to look out for.

However, if they are so convinced that it was a misdirection, they fail to mention who or what Emur was misdirecting from. As I think it's better to go after a killer than a symp, I would expect Ryll's investigation to end up there, not sticking with the hypothesized symp.

So, misdirection, from what or who?

And if you don't have a clue, Ryll, why are you're stating it like it's a fact? Odd.

[Liosan]

sorry I'm checking in. sick yesterday. but only a few pages of posts? guess catching up won't take me too long.