Hanas, on 12 August 2015 - 11:55 AM, said:
I totally disagree with you. Those that have a role may tend to talk about that role but no role has been indicated anywhere. Where does it benefit town to talk about town roles? As reveals are allowed someone could pop up and say they are a finder when they are in fact the symp.
Look at what HP is saying, his point of view is speculation on town roles. He's not looking at what scum we might have.
We could have an FM, a cult, an inheritance mechanic, standard scum pair, scum and a symp etc but that's not what he's looking at.
Wcs scenario we have 6 ri's and 2 scum which is exactly what Telas said. HP took the bait.
When I've been scum I've fallen into the trap Telas laid out. Someone mentions mechanics and I've jumped in from a similar point of view as HP.
That in itself is not damning. It was enough to warrant an early vote but his over reaction, defensiveness, Omgus and then playing the "I'm new card" was enough to see him lynched in my opinion.
I'm not going to speak for HP so I'll keep this short.
Your argument is a bit of a mess. Your second sentence has no obvious link to your first sentence. Yes, there could be fake reveals, what exactly is your point there? There could be fake reveals whether anyone talked about roles or not.
From MY experience, scum tend to talk about scum roles, and town about town. People talk about what they're most confident on, whether they do it consciously or not.
So I guess our experiences do not match, and that's why we differ in opinion on this.