Malazan Empire: Why no human soletaken eleint? - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Why no human soletaken eleint? Rate Topic: -----

#21 User is offline   Jaime Lannister 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 15-June 14
  • Location:Canada

Posted 29 June 2015 - 09:34 PM

View Postworry, on 29 June 2015 - 09:04 PM, said:

It's possible (and yah, kinda disappointing). Another reading of that though is that QB is there so Tayschrenn doesn't have to be.

Had he summoned Tays against the Nah'ruk they could have marshaled enough power to, at the very least, significantly mitigate Malazan and allied casualties, right? I don't remember the particulars of the encounter though -- perhaps the magnitude of the Nah'ruks advantage was such that even Tayschrenn's presence could not make a meaningful difference (and so Quick elected not to invite Tays to his death, for naught).

After every one of these encounters where I expected Tays to be summoned, my hype only grew -- since I thought it meant those situations, no matter how perilous, Quick determined were not sufficiently so to warrant summoning him yet. It didn't occur to me that Erikson may forget about it altogether :[

This post has been edited by Jaime Lannister: 29 June 2015 - 09:43 PM

0

#22 User is offline   Andorion 

  • God
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 4,516
  • Joined: 30-July 11
  • Interests:All things Malazan, sundry sci-fi and fantasy, history, Iron Maiden

Posted 30 June 2015 - 01:37 AM

Have you read RotCG? RotCG explains why Tay never participated in any goings on post TBH.
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users