Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 11:14 AM, said:
Pallid, on 18 June 2014 - 10:07 AM, said:
Sukul Ankhadu, on 18 June 2014 - 06:06 AM, said:
Well that was an exciting night.
way to be reaching for any excuse for a vote Pallid
Are you implying you don't think it's a good case? I'll have you know I considered all the evidence and decided it was the strongest one...
Having considered all the evidence (not really, I just skimmed)
Vote Hood's Path
Low posting scum.
Galayn votes Hood's Path
Denul makes 2 "cases" doesn't look vote on HP
Galayn then votes Liosan
Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 03:37 PM, said:
Denul, on 18 June 2014 - 03:23 PM, said:
Liosan, on 18 June 2014 - 03:18 PM, said:
Galayn Lord, on 18 June 2014 - 03:12 PM, said:
Pallid, on 18 June 2014 - 02:42 PM, said:
Well, since that case of Denul's basically refutes my reason for voting for him, I shall:
Remove Vote
I can see he's thinking along similar lines to my reasoning above in his case. But actually, the player who stood out a bit more to me was Barghast, particularly with this post:
Barghast, on 18 June 2014 - 01:34 PM, said:
I'm not very good at small talk. However, this did make me laugh..

Which happened a full two hours after this post from Shinrei:
Shinrei, on 18 June 2014 - 11:42 AM, said:
It is day 1, 15 hours and 10 minutes are left.
12 players are alive.
Ampelas, Atrahal, Barghast, Denul, Eloth, Galayn Lord, Hood's Path, Kaschan, Liosan, Nimander Golit, Pallid, Sukul Ankhadu
1 vote Sukul Ankhadu: Pallid
1 vote Hood's Path: Galayn Lord
Players not voting: Ampelas, Atrahal, Barghast, Denul, Eloth, Hood's Path, Kaschan, Liosan, Nimander Golit, Sukul Ankhadu
Note the underlined. We are short on time, and Barghast is cracking jokes with no indication that he's willing to engage his brain (even on the meagre evidence that had been presented up to that point).
Noting the underlined, does that post by Barghast stink of signalling or is it just me that thinks so?
HP, good of you to join us.
Remove Vote
On my phone so no complicated shit from me today.
I was thinking the random vote on HP was showing that you didn't care who you voted for (scummy imo) but with the remove vote due to HP appearing it seems like you were just jumping the gun on trying to get people to appear and post when there wasn't anything happening on thread. So you lose suspiciousness to me
This seems like a post trying to say that GL is town like to me. This makes me want to pay more attention to both you and GL.
Agreed, I dislike that post immeasurably. The style of judging an alt on single posts rubs me up the wrong way.
Vote Liosan
Liosan on Pallid
Liosan, on 19 June 2014 - 12:24 AM, said:
Top 3 in order of most to least suspicious: are Galayn Lord, you(This is a mix of Amps case and some gut), then its a toss up after that, maybe Nimander i guess.
Liosan, on 19 June 2014 - 12:28 AM, said:
So we could lynch Barghast, where we'd have I think 5 votes possible right now, or Pallid, with 5 votes possible, or (my personal choice) Galayn Lord with 4 votes possible right now.
Liosan, on 19 June 2014 - 12:28 AM, said:
Correction, the ones with 5 votes become 6 with HP, and GL becomes 5 votes possible with HP
Liosan, on 19 June 2014 - 01:12 AM, said:
I'd rather lynch GL than Pallid or Barghy, so I'll take the lead on this. If no one agrees, so be it and I'll add to someone else to get a lynch later, but for now:
Vote Galayn Lord
Now is it just me, or does the day one turn of events keep coming back to me. There's a lot of people alive from day one that GL accused of and disliked
From my case before if I were to tie three players together than Liosan, HP and Denul can fit the bill.
two players together nimander and Amp fit the bill.