[Path-Shaper]

Liosan, on 08 July 2013 - 05:26 PM, said:

i'm giving you 10:1 odds Bargy is another Loyalist.

[Path-Shaper]

Pran Chole, on 08 July 2013 - 05:27 PM, said:

Hurm. I can't decide who proves whose reveal more. If I kill Emu then Korbas could still be non PI. If I kill Korbas it would look like Emu is PI but he could just be extrapolating from all of Korbas' bullshit. I have ample time to change my attack to Emu if I feel I should, yes?

You have until night ends yes.

V

[Path-Shaper]

You shouldn't have had to made that a mode statement. It seemed pretty straight forward.

V

[Path-Shaper]

Path-Shaper, on 08 July 2013 - 05:30 PM, said:

You shouldn't have had to made that a mode statement. It seemed pretty straight forward.

V

I'm trying to head off future PMs where people are all like "WTF!"

I remember when I did my very first slightly complicated game, D'rek had an on-thread argument with me regarding the order of resolution, so I wanted to be clear and up front about it.

[Tellan]

SOMEBODY RUN INTO MY FUCKING GARGOYLE.

That's all I really wanted to say, especially with all this talk of Alera Imperia.

[Path-Shaper]

Hood, on 08 July 2013 - 06:43 PM, said:

Message to Emurlahn:


Hood's Path and Demelain are First Aleran. Both are currently in Elinarch.

Noted and message sent.

[Path-Shaper]

Tellan, on 08 July 2013 - 06:29 PM, said:

SOMEBODY RUN INTO MY FUCKING GARGOYLE.

That's all I really wanted to say, especially with all this talk of Alera Imperia.

Between your Gargoyle and the Immortals, I think lots of people are gonna be hurting after Night 5.

[Path-Shaper]

Path-Shaper, on 08 July 2013 - 05:35 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 08 July 2013 - 05:30 PM, said:

You shouldn't have had to made that a mode statement. It seemed pretty straight forward.

V

I'm trying to head off future PMs where people are all like "WTF!"

I remember when I did my very first slightly complicated game, D'rek had an on-thread argument with me regarding the order of resolution, so I wanted to be clear and up front about it.

The little arrows weren't clear? I mean they are little arrows...

[Path-Shaper]

Hood, on 08 July 2013 - 07:20 PM, said:

Provisional: Use Woodfuries passive and attack Shelly.

Noted

[Path-Shaper]

Pran Chole, on 08 July 2013 - 07:37 PM, said:

For the love of sweet baby Christos, fire fury on Korbas, final answer, I'm done with this debate.

Noted

V

[Path-Shaper]

Ultama, on 08 July 2013 - 03:39 PM, said:

Ultama, on 08 July 2013 - 03:39 PM, said:

Dawn phase day 5:
Water Fury heal Emurlahn

"Active Action: Your attack is changed into a heal. You may heal any player, including yourself. If your target is another player he or she is healed for attack power if he or she is on the same tile as you. If your target is yourself, you will be healed for half that amount."

I confirm this:
Dawn phase day 5:
Water Fury heal Emurlahn

noted

V

[Path-Shaper]

Ultama, on 08 July 2013 - 07:28 PM, said:

Paranoia time: I got a message from PS early yesterday morning telling me I could now traverse the blue line between Phyrgia and Antillus. And that he had forgot to tell me. I asked for clarification as to when I should have received that info but you know how that goes.

So I'm basing the rest of my game on the basis of Emurlahn putting on thread the information that explained my PS message.

There is at least one unrevealed FA. I don't suppose you'd break cover to say that you have not received similar information from PS if you have indeed not received such info? Not that I know how you'd prove the claim. *sigh*

(Nothing personal Emur. I've just been led down the path too many times.)

Edit: Clarity. Added line in italics

This post and a couple of other like it are starting to get close to the line of revealing PM's that we sent to players. I do not want players starting to count times on pms from us. I gave them a general warning on the thread. I will modkill any player who I see revealing wording of pms or anything else to do with mod PM's.

[Path-Shaper]

Path-Shaper, on 08 July 2013 - 07:57 PM, said:

Ultama, on 08 July 2013 - 07:28 PM, said:

Paranoia time: I got a message from PS early yesterday morning telling me I could now traverse the blue line between Phyrgia and Antillus. And that he had forgot to tell me. I asked for clarification as to when I should have received that info but you know how that goes.

So I'm basing the rest of my game on the basis of Emurlahn putting on thread the information that explained my PS message.

There is at least one unrevealed FA. I don't suppose you'd break cover to say that you have not received similar information from PS if you have indeed not received such info? Not that I know how you'd prove the claim. *sigh*

(Nothing personal Emur. I've just been led down the path too many times.)

Edit: Clarity. Added line in italics

This post and a couple of other like it are starting to get close to the line of revealing PM's that we sent to players. I do not want players starting to count times on pms from us. I gave them a general warning on the thread. I will modkill any player who I see revealing wording of pms or anything else to do with mod PM's.

Makes sense, and I agree.

What was with the mod removals of Korbas' posts? My net went down for a bit, so I didn't see those before you removed them.

[Path-Shaper]

I pmed this to Korbas

Posting the times that you received pms from the mod crosses the line. I deleted those posts. Because they where before the mod warning that I put out. Otherwise I would mod kill you. Consider this your only warning.

V

[Path-Shaper]

Path-Shaper, on 08 July 2013 - 08:05 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 08 July 2013 - 07:57 PM, said:

Ultama, on 08 July 2013 - 07:28 PM, said:

Paranoia time: I got a message from PS early yesterday morning telling me I could now traverse the blue line between Phyrgia and Antillus. And that he had forgot to tell me. I asked for clarification as to when I should have received that info but you know how that goes.

So I'm basing the rest of my game on the basis of Emurlahn putting on thread the information that explained my PS message.

There is at least one unrevealed FA. I don't suppose you'd break cover to say that you have not received similar information from PS if you have indeed not received such info? Not that I know how you'd prove the claim. *sigh*

(Nothing personal Emur. I've just been led down the path too many times.)

Edit: Clarity. Added line in italics

This post and a couple of other like it are starting to get close to the line of revealing PM's that we sent to players. I do not want players starting to count times on pms from us. I gave them a general warning on the thread. I will modkill any player who I see revealing wording of pms or anything else to do with mod PM's.

Makes sense, and I agree.

What was with the mod removals of Korbas' posts? My net went down for a bit, so I didn't see those before you removed them.

He posted the times that he received pm's from the mod on thread. A no no. I gave him a warning message.

[Path-Shaper]

Ah, cool beans re: Korbas.

What do you think bout this:

Kedeviss, on 08 July 2013 - 08:06 PM, said:

Quick question here. On day 1, I happened to see Fener's deleted post in which he revealed that if recruited by the Vord, he would enter into a lover pair with the queen. I'm not sure if that's true or not, but it could be useful for me to use it against him at some point. Considering that probably came straight from the role PM, if true, can I use that info?

I think that Fener is Invidia, so that info above would make sense, and I could use it to turn his faction against him later on.

My instinct is that yes, they can use it, cause Fener deleted before they realized they weren't actually dead and before I posted a warning not to do that, but it's information that's not really on thread anymore, so I'm not sure.

[Path-Shaper]

Path-Shaper, on 08 July 2013 - 08:08 PM, said:

Ah, cool beans re: Korbas.

What do you think bout this:

Kedeviss, on 08 July 2013 - 08:06 PM, said:

Quick question here. On day 1, I happened to see Fener's deleted post in which he revealed that if recruited by the Vord, he would enter into a lover pair with the queen. I'm not sure if that's true or not, but it could be useful for me to use it against him at some point. Considering that probably came straight from the role PM, if true, can I use that info?

I think that Fener is Invidia, so that info above would make sense, and I could use it to turn his faction against him later on.

My instinct is that yes, they can use it, cause Fener deleted before they realized they weren't actually dead and before I posted a warning not to do that, but it's information that's not really on thread anymore, so I'm not sure.

I would say that since he is not posting any information from his own pm then it is fine. Because the post was edited by the player and not a mod he can attempt to pin Fener with it. Basically anything from Kedeviss would be considered speculation and there for playable. I would say that he can use it but should be very careful in how he uses it. More speculation based on several things then in regards to one specific deleted post. Of course that is just a smart playing suggestion.

V

[Path-Shaper]

Korbas, on 08 July 2013 - 08:13 PM, said:

Yeah okay, didn't realise at the time and didn't even think to be honest

You where not the only one who was getting close. Just the only one who I edited their posts.

V

[Path-Shaper]

Demelain, on 08 July 2013 - 08:12 PM, said:

Emhur is to far away,

provisonal attack
using my fire fury, attack sheltha lore

noted

V

[Path-Shaper]

Path-Shaper, on 08 July 2013 - 08:13 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 08 July 2013 - 08:08 PM, said:

Ah, cool beans re: Korbas.

What do you think bout this:

Kedeviss, on 08 July 2013 - 08:06 PM, said:

Quick question here. On day 1, I happened to see Fener's deleted post in which he revealed that if recruited by the Vord, he would enter into a lover pair with the queen. I'm not sure if that's true or not, but it could be useful for me to use it against him at some point. Considering that probably came straight from the role PM, if true, can I use that info?

I think that Fener is Invidia, so that info above would make sense, and I could use it to turn his faction against him later on.

My instinct is that yes, they can use it, cause Fener deleted before they realized they weren't actually dead and before I posted a warning not to do that, but it's information that's not really on thread anymore, so I'm not sure.

I would say that since he is not posting any information from his own pm then it is fine. Because the post was edited by the player and not a mod he can attempt to pin Fener with it. Basically anything from Kedeviss would be considered speculation and there for playable. I would say that he can use it but should be very careful in how he uses it. More speculation based on several things then in regards to one specific deleted post. Of course that is just a smart playing suggestion.

V

Yeah, okay, agreed. I've responded to Kedeviss.