Malazan Empire: Mafia 101 Game Thread - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 51 Pages +
  • « First
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Mafia 101 Game Thread Meat & Potatoes

#321 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 15 May 2013 - 03:55 PM

View PostKilava, on 15 May 2013 - 03:39 PM, said:

I wouldn't mind defending myself if people could at least put together a sensible case.

But so far we have:

I'm not playing like scum -> I'm scum.
Kalse is my symp and I decided to try and get him lynched for "causing more harm than good", because at the same time as playing everything cool I'm apparently so tremendously nervous as to decide it's worth dropping a symp under next to no pressure, even though that would draw more attention to me and Kalse.
I was redirecting -> Vote me and not the person I'm redirecting from.
I "realised" Thyr was the symp -> I'm scum.
I was some sort of mastermind behind the Thyr lynch.
I'm partnered with Trake and Thyr was the symp who decided to get lynched to get the attention off of me and Trake after me and Trake had apparently decided we wanted that attention
I may have been distancing from kalse. For some reason. You could really lob this accusation at anyone who doesn't agree with anyone ever. Or if they do, you can say they're in cahoots.
I had more than one suspicion, and didn't just go for one person.


I mean, really.

At least for Mockra there's a long tradition of idiotically voting people for playing like town.
Ruse and Ryadd just seem like they want to throw votes on and will look for ways to justify it afterwards, regardless of if they make much sense. Rather similar to Ruse's important Thyr vote yesterday actually.



Just heading out. Your full of shit. That is a list up above. Scum love lists. Your just pissed because you assume you are playing a good town game and that we shouldn't lynch you. I bet you will turn out scum. You and Pallid. You forgot to mention him.

#322 User is offline   Trake 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 04:13 PM

Thyrllan has been lynched. He was town and Khellendros.

This almost makes up for the fact that he wasn't scum. It does take some of the shine off of lynching him with him having played the entire day as a newb who accidentally wandered into a mafia game. But still any Khell lynch is a good lynch. :p


Kilva I don't get either case. Ruse stands out to me as more suspicious but that just might be because his cases and comments don't make any sense. I am crazy busy in RL today but hopefully I will be able to get on and see if a case can be made.

#323 User is offline   Trake 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 04:16 PM

View PostRuse, on 15 May 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:

View PostKilava, on 15 May 2013 - 03:39 PM, said:

I wouldn't mind defending myself if people could at least put together a sensible case.

But so far we have:

I'm not playing like scum -> I'm scum.
Kalse is my symp and I decided to try and get him lynched for "causing more harm than good", because at the same time as playing everything cool I'm apparently so tremendously nervous as to decide it's worth dropping a symp under next to no pressure, even though that would draw more attention to me and Kalse.
I was redirecting -> Vote me and not the person I'm redirecting from.
I "realised" Thyr was the symp -> I'm scum.
I was some sort of mastermind behind the Thyr lynch.
I'm partnered with Trake and Thyr was the symp who decided to get lynched to get the attention off of me and Trake after me and Trake had apparently decided we wanted that attention
I may have been distancing from kalse. For some reason. You could really lob this accusation at anyone who doesn't agree with anyone ever. Or if they do, you can say they're in cahoots.
I had more than one suspicion, and didn't just go for one person.


I mean, really.

At least for Mockra there's a long tradition of idiotically voting people for playing like town.
Ruse and Ryadd just seem like they want to throw votes on and will look for ways to justify it afterwards, regardless of if they make much sense. Rather similar to Ruse's important Thyr vote yesterday actually.



Just heading out. Your full of shit. That is a list up above. Scum love lists. Your just pissed because you assume you are playing a good town game and that we shouldn't lynch you. I bet you will turn out scum. You and Pallid. You forgot to mention him.


Everyone loves lists. They are fun to make. Show an orderly mind and what not. Perhaps you should make a list on why your such a tard. Of everyone here I am the only one being a good towny. You might qualify but since your an idiot it takes you out of the running. :p

#324 User is offline   Kilava 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 04:18 PM

View PostRuse, on 15 May 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:

Just heading out. Your full of shit. That is a list up above. Scum love lists. Your just pissed because you assume you are playing a good town game and that we shouldn't lynch you. I bet you will turn out scum. You and Pallid. You forgot to mention him.


People actually take "scum love lists" as a serious piece of strategy advice?

I forgot to mention Pallid when? Several of the points refer to him. The one about thinking me and Trake are partnered with Thyr as symp for example.

I didn't mention him by name at the end because I was talking about people's votes and he didn't put a vote on, idiot.

If you want to bet I'll turn out scum that's good for you, but I'm afraid I'm not. If it wasn't against the rules I would be quite willing to put a stake on it. I guess I'll just have to settle for the satisfaction of being right.

As for being pissed, yes a bit. If we're going to vote people for not acting scummy as well as for acting scummy, we may as well just vote randomly. Apparently the idea of a town player playing like town, trying to prompt discussion, taking part in discussion, and actually trying to do something useful is no more. Is useful play such a fucking alien concept? Maybe we should not post instead, since apparently discussion "clouds up the thread", and then we can go for whatever the first thing that comes along is, since apparently tunnel vision is a positive trait too...

Morons.

#325 User is offline   Ruse 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 15 May 2013 - 04:30 PM

Morons for lynching you when your scum trying to act like town you mean?

#326 User is offline   Trake 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 04:34 PM

View PostKilava, on 15 May 2013 - 04:18 PM, said:

View PostRuse, on 15 May 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:

Just heading out. Your full of shit. That is a list up above. Scum love lists. Your just pissed because you assume you are playing a good town game and that we shouldn't lynch you. I bet you will turn out scum. You and Pallid. You forgot to mention him.


People actually take "scum love lists" as a serious piece of strategy advice?

I forgot to mention Pallid when? Several of the points refer to him. The one about thinking me and Trake are partnered with Thyr as symp for example.

I didn't mention him by name at the end because I was talking about people's votes and he didn't put a vote on, idiot.

If you want to bet I'll turn out scum that's good for you, but I'm afraid I'm not. If it wasn't against the rules I would be quite willing to put a stake on it. I guess I'll just have to settle for the satisfaction of being right.

As for being pissed, yes a bit. If we're going to vote people for not acting scummy as well as for acting scummy, we may as well just vote randomly. Apparently the idea of a town player playing like town, trying to prompt discussion, taking part in discussion, and actually trying to do something useful is no more. Is useful play such a fucking alien concept? Maybe we should not post instead, since apparently discussion "clouds up the thread", and then we can go for whatever the first thing that comes along is, since apparently tunnel vision is a positive trait too...

Morons.


I have been arguing that point for the last 10 games. It is horrible. To think that at one time we where considered a premium place to play mafia at. We have to face facts. Not any more.

#327 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 15 May 2013 - 04:47 PM

It is now Day 2. 19 hours 26 minutes remaining.

12 players still alive: Anthras, Denul, Eldat Pressen, Kalse, Kilava, Mockra, Monok Ochem, Pallid, Spite, Ruse, Ryadd Eleis, Trake

7 votes to lynch, 6 to go to night.

1 vote Kalse: Kilava
3 votes Kilava: Mockra, Ryadd Eleis, Ruse

Players not voted: Anthras, Denul, Eldat Pressen, Kalse, Monok Ochem, Pallid, Spite, Trake
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#328 User is offline   Monok Ochem 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:01 PM

you old-timers got to keep everybody straight

#329 User is offline   Mockra 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:22 PM

Ok, let me try again, since emotion keeps interjecting itself into the arguments, which is part of what makes mafia fun, right :p

This is a simple meat and potatoes game.

This means town has to rely on its own logic and arguing prowess to gain a consensus and eliminate scum via lynch.

Scum have several advantages to make up for their lacking numbers: lover pair, a symp who CF's town and thus can spread confusion and discord, and the NK.

Now when I joined mafia while back, the chief method of hunting down scum in these type of games involved looking for fuck-ups. Notorious examples reinforced this method, such as a person talking about town as if they were not one themselves. Moreover, even in more complex games, screwing up allowed the capture and destruction of powerful players trying to look normal and mundane.

Part of the fun, and problem, of this method is the assumption that playing scummy is the primary domain of scum. Unfortunately, this proves true nearly as much as randomly lynching eventually hits scum. Most of the time we end up with the classic day 1 lynch of a misunderstood RI.

With the perpetual threat of intentions being misunderstood, several methods have developed (used by town and scum alike) to avoid this trap. People can be hyperbole like Trake, standing out in flared passion, swearing like a sailor, etc etc. Similarly, people can act entirely scummy, such that they are discounted (Kalse).

On the otherhand, there are the cautious players who avoid giving any scummy vibes. These are the low posters and perfect townies.

Now I realize I am grossly simplifying the complexities of play, especially since people change styles as the game progresses. This change, I believe, makes it harder to pick out scum, because the more people talk, the more chances they have of sinking their boat. This is why despite the BS that flourishes during Day 1, we need to look at people closely for slip ups or playstyle choices to try and guess at their intentions.


If you read anything read this:

My case against Kilava is based on Day 1 playstyle. Kilava intentionally takes up the banner of a thoughtful, analytic townie, who tries to remain calm when attacked with votes, who tries to critique other's thoughts, and who shouts down the stupid and inane for confusing everyone and preventing meaningful discussion.

This playstyle is a choice, and on Day 1 appears heavy handed and contrived to me (and others). Thus, the case against Kilava is based on the presumed assumption that Kilava is trying to blend in by giving the appearance of a good townie, above suspicion and too valuable to lynch. It is a fairly easy role to fake in my experience (given my playstyle doesn't change much, regardless of my role status, RI or Scum) and done right, people can get through the game misguiding town.

Fortunately, played too earnestly, or nervously (as in Kilava's case, as mentioned by Ruse), the playstyle smells wrong, and inconsistencies, however tenuous, crop up. Kilava fits the bill of someone using the playstyle to hide in plain sight, not as a natural, innocent, helpful townie with nothing to hide.

That is why I vote Kilava and will push to see her lynched today.

#330 User is offline   Eldat Pressen 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:22 PM

Vote Monok Ochem


I just caught up. Worthless poster is worthless. Maybe in the Vein of a HO type scum player? I don't know. But day 2 is the time to get rid of low/worthless posters regardless of if you have a strong case. It's early enough that it doesn't harm town too much, and it removes them from the possibility of being involved in late game decisions of which they will either not take part or be...worthless.


So having caught up. I still trust trake (trust being a relative term...I'm not CIing him or anything), I actually liked Pallid's posts. I am leaning towards trusting Ruse... but his quote case against Kilava seem s a bit easy. Like he senses the tide growing against her and wants to add momentum. I am on the fence about Ruse. Kalse is another worthless poster and I don't have a good feel or read. I would be willing to vote them in the same vein as I am voting Monok. Awesome if we lynch scum, not so bad if they are town, as how much help are they going to be end game. I don't trust Ryadd and he is definitely playing to the role of moderate posting scum. I am willing to vote him. Anthras, Denul Spite..still waiting to get an impression. Though I am leaning inno on Denul.

#331 User is offline   Eldat Pressen 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:23 PM

oops, forgot Mockra. I do trust him more than most at the moment.

#332 User is offline   Eldat Pressen 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:29 PM

Monok's last 6 or so posts. Are you kidding me? Nothing of substance. Nothing to indicate one way or another if they are scum or inno. No application of pressure on anyone. Just one post of subtly defending of Kilava. I am not sure if he is a bored inno, or a low laying Killer. I think Khell was the symp, and even if he wasn't Monok is doing nothing that a symp would do. I just fear making it to end game with players like Monok. How are we supposed to glean anything from gems like these?

View PostMonok Ochem, on 14 May 2013 - 02:31 PM, said:

summaries are useful to the whole world, thx



View PostMonok Ochem, on 14 May 2013 - 06:03 PM, said:

View PostThyrllan, on 14 May 2013 - 05:40 PM, said:

Ok thanks again Kilava. So I guess I should try to make a good case on someone? Ok, if you guys give me a bit of time I will try.

I guess at least I have an advantage over you guys, because I know I'm not a killer and you guys don't seem to, so I can rule myself out anyway!


this is what the old folks like to call laying it on thick



View PostMonok Ochem, on 14 May 2013 - 06:44 PM, said:

it's way too early to call somebody smooth, good grief



View PostMonok Ochem, on 14 May 2013 - 07:09 PM, said:

just for fun, I want to make it clear I have moved from thinking Thyr is a little lost lamb to thinking he is a giant industrial strength feces launcher and will happily vote his way if no other scumly types emerge



View PostMonok Ochem, on 14 May 2013 - 07:22 PM, said:

hm, Thyr for right now



View PostMonok Ochem, on 15 May 2013 - 12:39 PM, said:

ok, back for today

I can't see the thread for the giant crowd of Kilava boners, seriously, I'll read some of that in a little while



View PostMonok Ochem, on 15 May 2013 - 05:01 PM, said:

you old-timers got to keep everybody straight


2 references to old timers. Signaling? Or just his phrase of the game?

#333 User is offline   Kilava 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:34 PM

View PostMockra, on 15 May 2013 - 05:22 PM, said:


My case against Kilava is based on Day 1 playstyle. Kilava intentionally takes up the banner of a thoughtful, analytic townie, who tries to remain calm when attacked with votes, who tries to critique other's thoughts, and who shouts down the stupid and inane for confusing everyone and preventing meaningful discussion.

This playstyle is a choice, and on Day 1 appears heavy handed and contrived to me (and others). Thus, the case against Kilava is based on the presumed assumption that Kilava is trying to blend in by giving the appearance of a good townie, above suspicion and too valuable to lynch. It is a fairly easy role to fake in my experience (given my playstyle doesn't change much, regardless of my role status, RI or Scum) and done right, people can get through the game misguiding town.

Fortunately, played too earnestly, or nervously (as in Kilava's case, as mentioned by Ruse), the playstyle smells wrong, and inconsistencies, however tenuous, crop up. Kilava fits the bill of someone using the playstyle to hide in plain sight, not as a natural, innocent, helpful townie with nothing to hide.

That is why I vote Kilava and will push to see her lynched today.



Or that's just how I play, you know? Thoughtful and analytic seems how one should try and play town, imo.

If you actually pointed out any of the claimed "inconsistencies" that made any sort of sense there would at least be some sort of case to bite into. As it stands, all I've had are attacks purely on playstyle, walls of quotes that don't really pertain to much, and speculation trying to make something scummy out of anything I've posted that the word "tenuous" is much too kind to.

#334 User is offline   Kilava 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:39 PM

I could go for Monok for much the same reasons as Kalse, as I pointed out yesterday. Is on while discussion is happening and chooses not to post. Still lean towards Kalse for not seeming to vote where his cases would actually suggest he ought to, which make it seem like he's not really voting for the reasons he says, much like Ruse.

Since I've already brought up the possibility of Kalse/Ruse, and have looked at Kalse already (and Ruse only on a couple of issues), I'm going to take a closer look at Ruse...

#335 User is offline   Monok Ochem 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:41 PM

wait, I'm around while my name is being mentioned...

It's Day 2, it's customary to reserve low-poster hunts or accusations of smoothness until a little later, guys, gonna have to get Tapper to update his tutorial

#336 User is offline   Eldat Pressen 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:41 PM

View PostKilava, on 15 May 2013 - 05:34 PM, said:

View PostMockra, on 15 May 2013 - 05:22 PM, said:

My case against Kilava is based on Day 1 playstyle. Kilava intentionally takes up the banner of a thoughtful, analytic townie, who tries to remain calm when attacked with votes, who tries to critique other's thoughts, and who shouts down the stupid and inane for confusing everyone and preventing meaningful discussion.

This playstyle is a choice, and on Day 1 appears heavy handed and contrived to me (and others). Thus, the case against Kilava is based on the presumed assumption that Kilava is trying to blend in by giving the appearance of a good townie, above suspicion and too valuable to lynch. It is a fairly easy role to fake in my experience (given my playstyle doesn't change much, regardless of my role status, RI or Scum) and done right, people can get through the game misguiding town.

Fortunately, played too earnestly, or nervously (as in Kilava's case, as mentioned by Ruse), the playstyle smells wrong, and inconsistencies, however tenuous, crop up. Kilava fits the bill of someone using the playstyle to hide in plain sight, not as a natural, innocent, helpful townie with nothing to hide.

That is why I vote Kilava and will push to see her lynched today.



Or that's just how I play, you know? Thoughtful and analytic seems how one should try and play town, imo.

If you actually pointed out any of the claimed "inconsistencies" that made any sort of sense there would at least be some sort of case to bite into. As it stands, all I've had are attacks purely on playstyle, walls of quotes that don't really pertain to much, and speculation trying to make something scummy out of anything I've posted that the word "tenuous" is much too kind to.


You realize, of course, that you are now in the position that you have to be lynched, or the scum will just keep you around to cause discord and make us waste a lynch on WIFOM down the line. Sucks to be you.

#337 User is offline   Eldat Pressen 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:44 PM

View PostMonok Ochem, on 15 May 2013 - 05:41 PM, said:

wait, I'm around while my name is being mentioned...

It's Day 2, it's customary to reserve low-poster hunts or accusations of smoothness until a little later, guys, gonna have to get Tapper to update his tutorial


Yet another wonderfully insightful post. Thank you for your input.

So you suggest waiting for day 3-4 to get rid of worthless/useless (you) posters? This is a 14 player game. (you might not know this because you are to busy thinking up snarky comments...so you're welcome). If you wait 3-4 days you are already at D-day.

#338 User is offline   Monok Ochem 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:49 PM

View PostEldat Pressen, on 15 May 2013 - 05:44 PM, said:

View PostMonok Ochem, on 15 May 2013 - 05:41 PM, said:

wait, I'm around while my name is being mentioned...

It's Day 2, it's customary to reserve low-poster hunts or accusations of smoothness until a little later, guys, gonna have to get Tapper to update his tutorial


Yet another wonderfully insightful post. Thank you for your input.

So you suggest waiting for day 3-4 to get rid of worthless/useless (you) posters? This is a 14 player game. (you might not know this because you are to busy thinking up snarky comments...so you're welcome). If you wait 3-4 days you are already at D-day.


any charge for this insightful analysis? I will have my people wire the funds directly to your fat head And so you know, snark is generated on a random basis, I devote no effort to its creation, a gift really

#339 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 15 May 2013 - 06:17 PM

It is now Day 2. 17 hours 55 minutes remaining.

12 players still alive: Anthras, Denul, Eldat Pressen, Kalse, Kilava, Mockra, Monok Ochem, Pallid, Spite, Ruse, Ryadd Eleis, Trake

7 votes to lynch, 6 to go to night.

1 vote Kalse: Kilava
3 votes Kilava: Mockra, Ryadd Eleis, Ruse
1 vote Monok Ochem: Eldat Pressen

Players not voted: Anthras, Denul, Eldat Pressen, Kalse, Pallid, Spite, Trake
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#340 User is offline   Kilava 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 15 May 2013 - 06:31 PM

Ok, so there's his odd vote which has already been spoken about. Then he points the finger at Trake. He thinks a symp clue is unlikely.

View PostRuse, on 13 May 2013 - 01:47 PM, said:

Just going to throw this out there, how fast was that response from Trake AND he points fingers elsewhere straight away. Seemingly scummy move in my opinion.

As to his suspicions, I see where he is coming from. I don't think any symp would be so obvious to do that. As when we finally catch a killer it can easily be traced back.

I think Trake could well be a killer.


He gets called on his vote and doesn't really address it, just dismisses it. He then puts out a theory that Trake and Denul are killers, with Denul fake symping Thyr to try and pretend that Denul is a symp, because we don't lynch symps much.

View PostRuse, on 13 May 2013 - 02:41 PM, said:

Joke votes aren't meant to make sense sonny. If you want to be serious then that is up to you.


The whole vote before the timer begins is a good way for a killer pair to concoct the role of pretend symp and lynch an innocent. I wouldn't put it past you being Denul's partner. That way we think Denul is symp and so try and make connections to who his master is. Therefore not voting Denul. Now you coming on and making the case against Thyr makes me believe you could be connected that way.


Explains his original vote, and that he is leaving his vote on seriously.

View PostRuse, on 14 May 2013 - 08:37 AM, said:

When I voted Trake originally I basically picked the one out of two alts that had not posted. The reason I have left my vote that way is because of his behaviour since or at least up until I went away. I have not had much time to read the thread yet. This game got serious very quickly. I was prodding him to post with the vote which he did but his posts felt wrong.


Now this post is one that I didn't make much note of at the time, but in hindsight, it seems kind of relevant right?

View PostRuse, on 14 May 2013 - 09:12 AM, said:

[...]

The case is flimsy at best.

Like this post by Ryadd, is it a joke? Do you all understand it?

View PostRyadd Eleis, on 12 May 2013 - 11:55 PM, said:

View PostPallid, on 12 May 2013 - 11:33 PM, said:

...... and my avatar looks like an electrified zebra. :|


At least you're a fellow critter of flesh and bones. The rest so far are just somewhat sentient mostly empty spaces.



It reads strange to me. Fellow critter of flesh and bones? Fellow to who? Is he comparing dragon and wolf? Or just because Mockra and that do not have "bodies"? Unless by Fellow he means another creature like Kilava? Kilava and Pallid killers with Ryadd as their symp? Mafia paranoia setting in here, I know he is meant to be referring to the avatars gone by as opposed to something deeper and meaningful, isn't he?

Now here is the first post that shows Thyrllan as wide eyed stupid

View PostThyrllan, on 13 May 2013 - 01:30 PM, said:

I couldn't find it in the OP - how many alts do we all get in this game again?


Is he joking here or being innocent? Is it someone pretending to be the noob on purpose? Or is it the noob?

[...]


Odd how he jumps to me and Pallid with Ryadd as a symp...I hadn't actually posted at the point when Ryadd made that post.

Also brings up Thyr playing the noob.

Here is some connection with Kalse. He plays He calls my vote good, but subtly defends Kalse too:

View PostRuse, on 14 May 2013 - 01:52 PM, said:

Good vote of Kalse there, his posts are yada yada whatever he said earlier. Disinterested townie in my opinion for now anyway.


He then explains he's not going to vote Kalse as 2 votes is enough pressure.

Kalse accuses him of deflecting from Thyr. Ruse says he'll vote Thyr for a lynch, but doesn't really agree with the case. Certainly doesn't seem to be his first choice...

View PostRuse, on 14 May 2013 - 03:21 PM, said:

View PostKalse, on 14 May 2013 - 03:04 PM, said:

Who said it was a joke vote? You and Ruse are clearly deflecting from Thryll whatever the fuck his name light is by voting for Trake someone who was serious right out of the gate so is so low on my scum list as to almost be PI. You all three need to go.

Thanks Have a nice day.



Clearly! That is exactly what I am trying to do. I will vote for Thyr to get a lynch but I don't have to agree with Trake's logic, I don't think Trake thinks Thyr will turn out to be scum.


...Which makes this vote seem pretty damn odd. While two votes were enough pressure for him not to vote Kalse, apparently he's fine being the fourth onto Thyr. Even though he doesn't seem very into the Thyr case at all. Certainly I can't see much reason on thread that he'd want to hop on the train at this point.

Also worth noting, that Ruse and Kalse don't really follow up on each other at all . Kalse goes for me rather than Ruse, and neither mention the other much at all.

The vote:

View PostRuse, on 14 May 2013 - 03:31 PM, said:

View PostTrake, on 14 May 2013 - 03:27 PM, said:

I do think that thy is scum he is trying to hard to try to be a total newb to actually be a newb. It is obvious that you do not think logically when it comes to mafia at all so there is no way that you will ever agree with my logic.



Oh is there logic within your posts? I fail to see that.

Vote Thyrllan


It's worth noting that this vote is big. It puts Thyr on 4, with the next nearest train being 2. Within 10 minutes, Thyr is L-3, and has become the main lynch candidate by a large margin. You'd expect someone making such a big vote to be a bit more behind the candidate.

Even after his vote, he doesn't seem very into Thyr. He's willing to vote him "in case signalling was right". He's earlier suggested he really doesn't think it is. And "If Thyr is faking I want to give that guy an Oscar" seems to suggest to me that he's really not convinced that Thyr is faking.

He's also really middle of the road below. His suspect list is nearly half the game (though neither Kalse, nor me for that matter), and there's no one he suspects for anything big. To note here are that he'd apparently be willing to vote the person he thinks is symp. Also that he felt Serc was fake symping him, though this just seems paranoid to me, don't remember him getting heat for it at all.

View PostRuse, on 14 May 2013 - 05:27 PM, said:

Wow.

If Thyr is faking I want to give that guy an Oscar.

I'd be willing to vote for Denul, Trake, Spite, Thyrllan, Serc, Ryadd for all different reasons. Nothing big though as it's only day one. Denul for initial vote that started this mess, Trake for his aggressive play when confronted, Spite for coasting along voting with the flow not adding much, thyrllan in case signalling was right, Serc for seemingly.fake symping me, he had been too agreeable with me and follows my vote, and Ryadd because I think he is the actual symp.


And then he votes me today:

View PostRuse, on 15 May 2013 - 07:53 AM, said:

Vote Kilava

Having just read up he argues with some people, pokes other people, is nice to other's a really mix of emotions coming from him. He is mostly active and I get a huge scum vibe from him. Some examples coming up.


It's kind of interesting. Since people have went for me from early today, as Mockra points out, any case is based on how I played yesterday. Which he really didn't mention at all at the time (even though he gave a huge list of people), and now it's a "huge scum vibe". I didn't even qualify for "nothing big" yesterday, but based on the same play he's voting now?

Won't really go into the case in depth, since this is a case on Ruse, rather than a defense of myself. Interesting to note that he circles back round to me and Pallid with Ryadd as symp though.

And much like earlier, his logic just doesn't really add up. It's like he's decided where he wants to vote and is then scrambling for any reason to vote there that he can find.

Also, similarly to earlier in the game with his Trake vote, he never really addresses people pointing out that he was willing to vote Ryadd rather than voting his master. The closer he comes is saying "Fine then" and voting me, as if that explains the initial slip.

I would be happy voting Ruse.

Anyhow, I'm off for a couple of hours now, back in a while.

Share this topic:


  • 51 Pages +
  • « First
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users