SIGNUPS for Mafia 99 and Mafia 100 Basics, then insanity
#301
Posted 24 March 2013 - 05:46 PM
Gah. Another bad thought.
"Before the game begins, each player must put their roles in the order of their choice and inform PS. "
28 people, 28 responses, 28 role PMs. Shit, this game could take a week to start just due to timezone differences.
"Before the game begins, each player must put their roles in the order of their choice and inform PS. "
28 people, 28 responses, 28 role PMs. Shit, this game could take a week to start just due to timezone differences.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#302
Posted 24 March 2013 - 06:14 PM
Mentalist, on 24 March 2013 - 05:33 PM, said:
The towns will be larger than the scum?
I'm assuming that D'rek made room for Bubba.
28 - 3 = 25. 8 per town leaves 4 per scum with 1 extra. Maybe 9 and 3?
Hmm. Wouldn't the saboteur leave the serial killer alive? And paint targets on the back of the Jester? And kill off the survivor?
Assume he's on a town. I'll go with the 9. To be really effective as a town saboteur he'd have to take out both town factions. So 18. 2 of the independents. 20 players. 60 alts. Out of 84.
I don't think he can do it. Even if you go with 8 per town, that's 54 alts.
Assume scum. Again, he has to take out both teams. 9/3 split means 6 scum + 2 independents. 24 alts. 8/4 split is 30 alts.
Those are achievable.
The math suggests that if Khell is scum, town will win. If he is town, it's a toss up. His town faction is doomed of course, but taking both town factions would be a much larger "achievement".
If he is one of the independents? Hmm. Town/Scum VCs become irrelevant (so far as the saboteur's friendly fire is considered.) Serial killer means Survivor wins. Survivor means Serial Killer wins.
The Jester? I'm not certain how to place him if Khell is one of the 3. Since the jester can co-win with the Survivor, they're tied together.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#303
Posted 24 March 2013 - 06:22 PM
Gnaw, on 24 March 2013 - 06:14 PM, said:
Mentalist, on 24 March 2013 - 05:33 PM, said:
The towns will be larger than the scum?
I'm assuming that D'rek made room for Bubba.
28 - 3 = 25. 8 per town leaves 4 per scum with 1 extra. Maybe 9 and 3?
Hmm. Wouldn't the saboteur leave the serial killer alive? And paint targets on the back of the Jester? And kill off the survivor?
Assume he's on a town. I'll go with the 9. To be really effective as a town saboteur he'd have to take out both town factions. So 18. 2 of the independents. 20 players. 60 alts. Out of 84.
I don't think he can do it. Even if you go with 8 per town, that's 54 alts.
Assume scum. Again, he has to take out both teams. 9/3 split means 6 scum + 2 independents. 24 alts. 8/4 split is 30 alts.
Those are achievable.
The math suggests that if Khell is scum, town will win. If he is town, it's a toss up. His town faction is doomed of course, but taking both town factions would be a much larger "achievement".
If he is one of the independents? Hmm. Town/Scum VCs become irrelevant (so far as the saboteur's friendly fire is considered.) Serial killer means Survivor wins. Survivor means Serial Killer wins.
The Jester? I'm not certain how to place him if Khell is one of the 3. Since the jester can co-win with the Survivor, they're tied together.
Gnaw, Gnaw. How it happens will have absolutely nothing to do with my role. I will manage it DESPITE my role, whatever it be. It will be a forehead-smacking, eye-hiding, cringe-inducing spectacle.
Also, your theorising makes it look as if it would all happen intentionally. Unfortunately, that's not the saboteur's way.
And to think there'll be three opportunities to fuck up everything. Oh, the glory!
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#304
Posted 24 March 2013 - 06:38 PM
Khellendros, on 24 March 2013 - 06:22 PM, said:
Gnaw, Gnaw. How it happens will have absolutely nothing to do with my role. I will manage it DESPITE my role, whatever it be. It will be a forehead-smacking, eye-hiding, cringe-inducing spectacle.
Also, your theorising makes it look as if it would all happen intentionally. Unfortunately, that's not the saboteur's way.
And to think there'll be three opportunities to fuck up everything. Oh, the glory!
Also, your theorising makes it look as if it would all happen intentionally. Unfortunately, that's not the saboteur's way.
And to think there'll be three opportunities to fuck up everything. Oh, the glory!
I think you're missing that I never approached how it would happen. Just doing the math to see if any given placement could feasibly result in a complete wipe due to the Khelloteur's Kurse®.
This post has been edited by Gnaw: 24 March 2013 - 06:41 PM
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#305
Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:12 PM
Gnaw, on 24 March 2013 - 06:38 PM, said:
Khellendros, on 24 March 2013 - 06:22 PM, said:
Gnaw, Gnaw. How it happens will have absolutely nothing to do with my role. I will manage it DESPITE my role, whatever it be. It will be a forehead-smacking, eye-hiding, cringe-inducing spectacle.
Also, your theorising makes it look as if it would all happen intentionally. Unfortunately, that's not the saboteur's way.
And to think there'll be three opportunities to fuck up everything. Oh, the glory!
Also, your theorising makes it look as if it would all happen intentionally. Unfortunately, that's not the saboteur's way.
And to think there'll be three opportunities to fuck up everything. Oh, the glory!
I think you're missing that I never approached how it would happen. Just doing the math to see if any given placement could feasibly result in a complete wipe due to the Khelloteur's Kurse®.
I am anathema to mathematics and the laws of probability.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#306
Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:53 PM
Hinter, on 20 March 2013 - 11:48 AM, said:
All this jollity aside, where the fuck is my PM?
Not that I'm impatient or anything, but the 25th is not long after tomorrow, Daddy Hinter is champing at the bit and I've got IBM blueshirts (no pockets, obviously) hanging on the phone, but all I can tell them is "alt Brujah, lynch Brujah".
IBM time is money D'rek!
P.S. Dad doesn't want to be Ampelas again. "Looks like that baby dinosaur in that cartoon you used to love" he said. I think he means Godzooky.
Not that I'm impatient or anything, but the 25th is not long after tomorrow, Daddy Hinter is champing at the bit and I've got IBM blueshirts (no pockets, obviously) hanging on the phone, but all I can tell them is "alt Brujah, lynch Brujah".
IBM time is money D'rek!
P.S. Dad doesn't want to be Ampelas again. "Looks like that baby dinosaur in that cartoon you used to love" he said. I think he means Godzooky.
The Dude, on 22 March 2013 - 11:35 PM, said:
Stupid Stay Puft... Seriously... Body jump... we had that game won!!!
Send out roles!!!! need to start planning the most efficient way to kill mentalist!
Send out roles!!!! need to start planning the most efficient way to kill mentalist!
We needs our PMs. We mussst have the PMses. Our precious PMs. Our preciousss...
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#307
Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:56 PM
Khellendros, on 24 March 2013 - 03:52 PM, said:
My goal is take as many people down with me as possible.
Amen
How many fucking people do I have to hammer in order to get that across.
Hinter - Vengy - DIE. I trusted you you bastard!!!!!!!
Steven Erikson made drowning in alien cum possible - Obdigore
Hinter - Vengy - DIE. I trusted you you bastard!!!!!!!
Steven Erikson made drowning in alien cum possible - Obdigore
#308
Posted 24 March 2013 - 08:07 PM
Vengeance, on 24 March 2013 - 07:56 PM, said:
I was reading some past threads and found one about 'tells'. You said that you had been trying to tone down your language lately. That led me to wonder 2 things.
Have you since just given up the attempt?
if not and you have 'toned down'
What the fuck did you used to sound like?
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#309
Posted 24 March 2013 - 08:20 PM
- Esselmontarians (Town 1)
- Eriksonians (Town 2)
- Goodkinders (Scum 1)
- Meyerns (Scum 2)
I get the Meyer hatred. But she's not a discussed ME forum type. So really, shouldn't it be:
- Eriksonians (Town 1)
- Butcherians or Dresdenians (Town 2)
- Goodkinders (Scum 1)
- Esselmontarians (Scum 2)
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#310
Posted 24 March 2013 - 08:45 PM
The Dude, on 22 March 2013 - 11:35 PM, said:
Stupid Stay Puft... Seriously... Body jump... we had that game won!!!
Oh, please - if I hadn't slipped up in-thread on Day ... Three, IIRC, I would've won that game single-handed.
I finally have an avatar ... and it's better than yours.
#311
Posted 24 March 2013 - 10:07 PM
The Jester:
- Get lynched! Don't get NK'd
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#312
Posted 24 March 2013 - 10:31 PM
Gnaw, on 24 March 2013 - 08:20 PM, said:
- Esselmontarians (Town 1)
- Eriksonians (Town 2)
- Goodkinders (Scum 1)
- Meyerns (Scum 2)
I get the Meyer hatred. But she's not a discussed ME forum type. So really, shouldn't it be:
- Eriksonians (Town 1)
- Butcherians or Dresdenians (Town 2)
- Goodkinders (Scum 1)
- Esselmontarians (Scum 2)
Your newb is showing, Gnaw.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#313
Posted 24 March 2013 - 11:39 PM
HoosierDaddy, on 24 March 2013 - 10:31 PM, said:
Your newb is showing, Gnaw.
As in the mod likes ICE and therefore I am likely to end up with RI, RI, RI?
Or the fact that I'm high poster in the sign-up sheet?
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#314
Posted 24 March 2013 - 11:50 PM
Gnaw, on 24 March 2013 - 11:39 PM, said:
As in there have been many Meyer threads on here, just not one in a while.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#315
Posted 25 March 2013 - 12:08 AM
HoosierDaddy, on 24 March 2013 - 11:50 PM, said:
Ah. That's probably more my age and social circle showing. The whole Twilight thing just blows past me. I lost interest in vampires somewhere around Rice's 5th or 6th Lestat book.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#316
Posted 25 March 2013 - 12:31 AM
Gnaw, on 24 March 2013 - 08:20 PM, said:
- Esselmontarians (Town 1)
- Eriksonians (Town 2)
- Goodkinders (Scum 1)
- Meyerns (Scum 2)
I get the Meyer hatred. But she's not a discussed ME forum type. So really, shouldn't it be:
- Eriksonians (Town 1)
- Butcherians or Dresdenians (Town 2)
- Goodkinders (Scum 1)
- Esselmontarians (Scum 2)
I take it you haven't read the Twilight Mafia?
Also, Meyer was discussed a-plenty.
But, since Twilight isn't literature, all the discussions took place in the Inn. Go back to around the time Twilight got big (200...8ish?) and read the dedicated Twilight threads there.
#317
Posted 25 March 2013 - 01:00 AM
2 replies about Twilight.
0 replies about esslemontians being scum.
It would appear that I have indeed misjudged the level of Meyer hatred.
0 replies about esslemontians being scum.
It would appear that I have indeed misjudged the level of Meyer hatred.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#318
#319
Posted 25 March 2013 - 01:23 AM
Oh my. How many games does it take to be a "trend"?
99 Final day successfully lynched the other town
98 NKed night 1 by my own faction leader
97 Final day successfully lynched my own faction leader
96 NKed night 1 by the randomizer
99 Final day successfully lynched the other town
98 NKed night 1 by my own faction leader
97 Final day successfully lynched my own faction leader
96 NKed night 1 by the randomizer
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#320
Posted 25 March 2013 - 01:44 AM
Gnaw, on 25 March 2013 - 01:23 AM, said:
Oh my. How many games does it take to be a "trend"?
99 Final day successfully lynched the other town
98 NKed night 1 by my own faction leader
97 Final day successfully lynched my own faction leader
96 NKed night 1 by the randomizer
99 Final day successfully lynched the other town
98 NKed night 1 by my own faction leader
97 Final day successfully lynched my own faction leader
96 NKed night 1 by the randomizer
for Q21 dying night 1 it took.... 2? I think?