Quote
(Cotillion) 'Why do you miss Edgewalker, then?'
(Panek) 'For his stories.'
'Oh, those.'
'The dragons, The foolish ones, the wise ones, the living ones and the dead ones. If every world were but a place on the board, they would be the game pieces. Yet no single hand directs them. Each is wild, a will unto itself. And then there are the shadows - Edgewalker explained about those - the ones you can't see.'
'He explained, did he? Well, clearly the hoary bastard likes you more than he does me.'
'They all cast shadows, Uncle,' Panek said. 'Into your realm. Every one of them. That's why there's so many... prisoners.'
Cotillion frowned, then, slowly, inexorably as comprehension dawned, the god's eyes widened.
(Panek) 'For his stories.'
'Oh, those.'
'The dragons, The foolish ones, the wise ones, the living ones and the dead ones. If every world were but a place on the board, they would be the game pieces. Yet no single hand directs them. Each is wild, a will unto itself. And then there are the shadows - Edgewalker explained about those - the ones you can't see.'
'He explained, did he? Well, clearly the hoary bastard likes you more than he does me.'
'They all cast shadows, Uncle,' Panek said. 'Into your realm. Every one of them. That's why there's so many... prisoners.'
Cotillion frowned, then, slowly, inexorably as comprehension dawned, the god's eyes widened.
So what is the great epiphany at the end here?
This is my re-read of tBH before I tackle the last few books, and I've managed to deduce every oblique comment that puzzled me the first time round, but Cotillion's reaction here has me stumped.
So is Panek is saying that all dragons in the world exist simultaneously in the Shadow warren (or Kurald Emurlahn?), and that this is a weakness that can be exploited? So the three chained dragons at the start of tBH can also be found in the real world? Why is Cotillion shitting himself over this?