[Sorrit]

PS can we have a time update and what is happening for the weekend freeze please.

[Spite]

Sorrit, on 12 October 2012 - 07:58 AM, said:

I mean I may as well vote myself off to prove I am town and have an early resolution if that is not going to happen.

If you were to see your lynch as inevitable, you'd want it to drag out because that would allow more things/opinions to come out on thread. If you are inno, lynching you quickly is actually worse.

[Sorrit]

You are one of the people i'll be looking at if we have the time. Your play so far has been less than helpful and I do find you scummy.

[Galain]

ok back on for a bit will reread now

[Galain]

Ok where are we in regards to time and vote count?

Telann seems to have slightly calmed down, which is good. Sorrit does look like a reasonable case, so il go look back on him and see if i agree.

[Galain]

Im not really that sure on Sorrit, there have been a few dodgy quotes from him like wifom on the emu kill and fatalism, but looking back there are a few people id rather go for like Telann, TS and Meanas.

i think we've got abotu 3 hours left now but i have no idea where the vote count is at

[Tulas Shorn]

I'm back - how much time?

I'm going to read the last page and then comment

[Galain]

i think we have about 2-3 hours left. Ive got to go soonish so i will put a vote down before i leave

[Olar Ethil]

Sorrit, on 12 October 2012 - 07:58 AM, said:

If enough town think I'm scum then fair enough. As a townie i'd suggest a deeper look into Meanas tomorrow as he would be influencial on both town lynches so far. In fact scrap that let me refute the claims against me.



The first thing before going into other posts is to say scum would not point a finger at multiple people the way I have done. I have pointed a finger at Spite, Karosis, Tellan, Osseric and Meanas off the top of my head. Yes my play has been erratic. I haven't properly settled on one target as I have been mixing it up. reading over Korv's post and breakdown of my case I feel as though I have been grasping at some straws. I can only say sorry for that.


If the time goes down and we need a lynch I really do agree with lynching me if there is no alternative. To actually be able to do this though and put the effort in today I'd need to know if people are going to be around. There'd be no point in me slacking in work looking at various people on here if i'm not going to have a chance of changing your minds to find scum. I mean I may as well vote myself off to prove I am town and have an early resolution if that is not going to happen. If there is a chance AND town are going to be around then I'll delve into the thread and get stuck in. I am not a town player you'd like to lose.

The thing is, scum WOULD point fingers at multiple people, because it's easier than building a case on one person which you know, as scum, to be complete bullshit.

The jumping around has reall y hurt you in my opinion. Take just a little earlier - you made what I thought were some very god points concerning Karosis and his seeming lining up the next target if you're lynched and end up inno, but immediately after that you switch and say let's look at Meanas!

[Galain]

ok i have to go now and i wont be on again before time out. So im going to

remove vote


Vote Sorrit


because there have been quite a few comments from him that have been a bit dodgy and iim not too sure on telann since he became slightly calmer.

[Spite]

Sorrit, on 12 October 2012 - 08:52 AM, said:

You are one of the people i'll be looking at if we have the time. Your play so far has been less than helpful and I do find you scummy.

I haven't seen anything in particular worth pointing out, so yes, I have not been terribly helpful. I'm not getting any "gut" feelings yet, and I don't really see a quote-foo case emerging from what I've read.

What I DO think, is with the various accusations that have flown about today, we are having a nice info-filled day 2.

[Korvalain]

Here's my take on day 2 as I reread it. To provide a caveat, I still think Sorrit's the best choice of today despite my suspicion of others. I still would like to capture other irregular behavior today, especially when I doubt killing 1 scum will win the game for us (which means we have others to find, even if Sorrit is scum).

Meanas very quickly discounts the case on TS, largely based on TS's refusal to hammer at the end of day 1 (which has been a very contentious point for the rest of the day actually). The problem I have with Meanas is he blows things out of proportion, harping on one detail (that may or may not be accurate) and has a tendency to ignore other salient points. There is suspicion that Meanas is scum, and I've liked the idea that he is a symp. He jumps to the defense of a couple of people (TS and Karo), often before any momentum is gained, like he is trying to head a lynch off at the pass, so to speak. This is a theory worth looking into.

Tellan still rings alarm bells in my head, despite his increased contribution. He is too proud of making a train on an admittedly weak case and then failing to discuss his vote (which he claims was a conversation starter). In fact, the tough guy routine is really what niggles at me. Comments like "WIFOM is not a good case and I wont defend myself against it" smack of someone trying to get away with not defending themselves on principle and instead cutting down the accusers as idiots. I mean, if allowed to happen, it is a great way to defend oneself, but the refusal to participate is more an act of avoidance than ballsiness.

[Korvalain]

Spite, on 12 October 2012 - 12:16 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 12 October 2012 - 08:52 AM, said:

You are one of the people i'll be looking at if we have the time. Your play so far has been less than helpful and I do find you scummy.

I haven't seen anything in particular worth pointing out, so yes, I have not been terribly helpful. I'm not getting any "gut" feelings yet, and I don't really see a quote-foo case emerging from what I've read.

What I DO think, is with the various accusations that have flown about today, we are having a nice info-filled day 2.

An info filled day that you can't find any material to contribute to the discussion eh?

[Korvalain]

6 Votes for Sorrit (Tellan, Meanas, Korvalain, Karosis, Osseric, Galain)

It think he's good and dead now.

[Spite]

By info filled, we're seeing who is willing to accuse who. The only way I could "contribute" to that particular information would be some sort of summary of the finger pointing. Or I could accuse someone else, which I made clear I am not ready to do because nothing has really caught my attention.

[Korvalain]

Spite, on 12 October 2012 - 12:24 PM, said:

By info filled, we're seeing who is willing to accuse who. The only way I could "contribute" to that particular information would be some sort of summary of the finger pointing. Or I could accuse someone else, which I made clear I am not ready to do because nothing has really caught my attention.

So by nothing catching your attention, do you mean all the cases thus far are bogus and not worth commenting on?

[Tellan]

Korvalain, on 12 October 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:

Tellan still rings alarm bells in my head, despite his increased contribution. He is too proud of making a train on an admittedly weak case and then failing to discuss his vote (which he claims was a conversation starter). In fact, the tough guy routine is really what niggles at me. Comments like "WIFOM is not a good case and I wont defend myself against it" smack of someone trying to get away with not defending themselves on principle and instead cutting down the accusers as idiots. I mean, if allowed to happen, it is a great way to defend oneself, but the refusal to participate is more an act of avoidance than ballsiness.

Your face is an act of avoidance. Make up your mind fuck-hole *new word.

[Spite]

Korvalain, on 12 October 2012 - 12:25 PM, said:

Spite, on 12 October 2012 - 12:24 PM, said:

By info filled, we're seeing who is willing to accuse who. The only way I could "contribute" to that particular information would be some sort of summary of the finger pointing. Or I could accuse someone else, which I made clear I am not ready to do because nothing has really caught my attention.

So by nothing catching your attention, do you mean all the cases thus far are bogus and not worth commenting on?

Post #227, I do comment.

Just because I don't do an annoying red font to pick apart every sentence in a page long multi-quote doesn't mean I'm not speaking my mind.

[Korvalain]

Tellan, on 12 October 2012 - 12:26 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 12 October 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:

Tellan still rings alarm bells in my head, despite his increased contribution. He is too proud of making a train on an admittedly weak case and then failing to discuss his vote (which he claims was a conversation starter). In fact, the tough guy routine is really what niggles at me. Comments like "WIFOM is not a good case and I wont defend myself against it" smack of someone trying to get away with not defending themselves on principle and instead cutting down the accusers as idiots. I mean, if allowed to happen, it is a great way to defend oneself, but the refusal to participate is more an act of avoidance than ballsiness.

Your face is an act of avoidance. Make up your mind fuck-hole *new word.

Not TM'ed?

And how can a face be an act of avoidance. Face, in the context which you use it, is a tangible object with spacial dimensions. An "act" is a noun to describe what is essentially a verb, an action, something with no stable spacial presence. I fail to see the conversion of which you speak.

[Spite]

Sorry, that should be post 277, not 227