[Stalker]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 05:11 AM, said:

Should've gone with Stalker.... Fuck.

would have gotten the same result, and been just as pissed. My gut has been ment, so I'll place a vote where I am feeling it, cause we can't afford another dead town.


vote Mentalist

[Obdigore]

Stalker, on 05 March 2012 - 05:54 AM, said:

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 05:11 AM, said:

Should've gone with Stalker.... Fuck.

would have gotten the same result, and been just as pissed. My gut has been ment, so I'll place a vote where I am feeling it, cause we can't afford another dead town.


vote Mentalist

And are we supposed to believe that? HEY LOOK EVERYBODY IM INNOCENT TOO.

[Stalker]

I don't expect anyone to believe it, this is mafia, no trust until proven inno, and even then not always. I've mentioned ment before as being suspicious, so placing my vote there.

[Mentalist]

people I have basically no read on at this point: Bubba, D'rek, Stalker.

with two innos down, I'm not sure who to lynch.

[HoosierDaddy]

I'm willing to vote anybody I didn't vig. So for now:

Vote D'rek

Very few people were hanging around waiting for what would happen: D'rek, Ment, and Obdi.

[Obdigore]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 06:11 AM, said:

I'm willing to vote anybody I didn't vig. So for now:

Vote D'rek

Very few people were hanging around waiting for what would happen: D'rek, Ment, and Obdi.

So anyone online who wanted to see who you were going to vig must be a killer, right?

[HoosierDaddy]

Obdigore, on 05 March 2012 - 06:13 AM, said:

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 06:11 AM, said:

I'm willing to vote anybody I didn't vig. So for now:

Vote D'rek

Very few people were hanging around waiting for what would happen: D'rek, Ment, and Obdi.

So anyone online who wanted to see who you were going to vig must be a killer, right?

No, it means they were interesting. And, I had D'rek in the group for a while.

I'd ask if you were nervous, but that's self-evident.

[Obdigore]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 06:15 AM, said:

Obdigore, on 05 March 2012 - 06:13 AM, said:

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 06:11 AM, said:

I'm willing to vote anybody I didn't vig. So for now:

Vote D'rek

Very few people were hanging around waiting for what would happen: D'rek, Ment, and Obdi.

So anyone online who wanted to see who you were going to vig must be a killer, right?

No, it means they were interesting. And, I had D'rek in the group for a while.

I'd ask if you were nervous, but that's self-evident.

I'm hoping you mean evidently false.

That is a shity reason to vote for someone. Vote for her for claiming we shouldn't lynch someone today, or for being to smooth, or for not having a read on her. But to vote for someone for being around? That seems like a dumb vote.

[HoosierDaddy]

What are you worried about? It's one vote.

[Obdigore]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 06:18 AM, said:

What are you worried about? It's one vote.

I'm worried? Hold on let me check my feelings. Nope, not worried.

I think its ironic that you yelled at people numerous times for voting on reasons you didn't like, and now you are getting all defensive when someone does it to you.

[HoosierDaddy]

Your point?

[HoosierDaddy]

I laid off once seeing it was a continued vote. Just like mine is a continued train of thought.

[Obdigore]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 06:22 AM, said:

Your point?

My point was that 'voting for someone because they were on thread' is a stupid reason to vote. You can come up with better than that for D'rek pretty easily.

The problem, HD, is that you are a PI now, and where you go town will follow, as will killers if you aren't on a killer. Therefore you can't decide to just phone it in as you look like you are about to do.

[HoosierDaddy]

Did you notice that two of those three were in the last group of scum I considered vigging?

Do you think the vote might be based on that plus what I said?

Or do you just want to excoriate the vote? I'd say you were symping here but it's way too fucking obvious.

[HoosierDaddy]

Obdigore, on 05 March 2012 - 06:24 AM, said:

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 06:22 AM, said:

Your point?

My point was that 'voting for someone because they were on thread' is a stupid reason to vote. You can come up with better than that for D'rek pretty easily.

The problem, HD, is that you are a PI now, and where you go town will follow, as will killers if you aren't on a killer. Therefore you can't decide to just phone it in as you look like you are about to do.

Saying town will go where I follow is bullshit. They just know my motivation is pure, that doesn't mean they have to like or support any reasoning behind it.

Phoning it in. Bah. Suck a bag o' dicks.

Is any vote I make subject to this same interrogation or something intrinsic in that vote.

D'rek was asking us not to lynch anyone else after vigging. It seems reasonable, but could also be purposefully played to let scum just move ahead unhindered until night.

[Obdigore]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 06:26 AM, said:

Did you notice that two of those three were in the last group of scum I considered vigging?

Do you think the vote might be based on that plus what I said?

Or do you just want to excoriate the vote? I'd say you were symping here but it's way too fucking obvious.

What did you say? You said (Here are three people around the time when I voted, so I'm going to vote for one)

You didn't mention anything to back it up or anything of the sort. Stop being an obfuscative ass and support you decision to vote.

[Obdigore]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 06:30 AM, said:

D'rek was asking us not to lynch anyone else after vigging. It seems reasonable, but could also be purposefully played to let scum just move ahead unhindered until night.

Indeed it could, but you didnt fucking mention that. You just did a crap-shoot of a vote.

[HoosierDaddy]

No, you just haven't fucking been reading what I've been saying. That's not on me, that's on YOU.

[HoosierDaddy]

Why the fuck are you looking at the Vampire Madness game, Ment?

[Obdigore]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 06:32 AM, said:

No, you just haven't fucking been reading what I've been saying. That's not on me, that's on YOU.

No. Your vote post needs to have SOME kind of justification in it, or you need to have made a case on people. You have not done either.