[Silencer]

Well, I see the first 7 pages are all useless day-one crap, and no-one appears to be around to chat. So I guess I'll just go do other things then.

[dktorode]

Got home only to fınd my ınternet not workıng . should be up and runnıng tomorrow at the start of the new month new data cap and all.
Not goıng o bother wıth my phone apart from thıs. the 3G connectıon here ıs terrıble. took me 30 mınutes to just get to be able to post.
Happy days

[Macros]

morning all, a pre work check in.
4 pages of utter shite read.

Grief really does seem to be mad keen on lynching ja (which is fine with me, that weaseling fuck!) but his justifications are more than a little thin.
I don't see people getting jumped on for mentioning repeatedly other players not having posted yet, that being said JA's reaction was quite irate so I'ma leave my vote where it is right now, but I've got a weather eye cocked in Grief's direction.

time for the morning poop

[The Dude]

This whole Grief/JA thing is weird. I think it was pretty clear that the vote was a joke, but JA's responses were odd. At this point I am gonna chalk it up to day 1 shennanigans. I think we would all be much better servved to vote Ment in a show of solidarity.

PS Has anyone noticed how smooth Silencer is playing? IGMEOY

[Mentalist]

I's back.

rejoice, everyone

[Khellendros]

They have an actual case over on the newbie thread. The case hinges on someone trying to appear too new

[Macros]

and now i think the dude is symping ja/grief.

marvelous stuff

[Mentalist]

K0rbas, on 29 February 2012 - 10:05 PM, said:

They have an actual case over on the newbie thread. The case hinges on someone trying to appear too new

I posted that list over in teh signup thread....

just to make sure you remember where your priorities lie,

[Mentalist]

Macros, on 29 February 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:

and now i think the dude is symping ja/grief.

marvelous stuff

yeah, i'm not a fan of that vote-remove vote move.

but, otoh, I feel that lynching JA on Day 1 altless would be too predictable.

[The Dude]

Macros, on 29 February 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:

and now i think the dude is symping ja/grief.

marvelous stuff

Does that mean if you bring up the only meanigful interaction that has occured in the game so far, you are symping? The same could be said for you with your prior wishy/washy post. Like I said, imo its the standard day 1 bullshit that will result in an inno lynch. The fact that Grief started the whole thing over an obvious joke vote is more suspicious to me than JA's reactions.

[Mentalist]

Also, cases? on Day 1?

what are they, newbs or something?

[Macros]

no, I mean you bringing up the only meaningful interaction, writing it off totally as shenanigans then pointing in the complete other directoin in a joking fashion.

THAT is what I mean, justify it bitch

[The Dude]

Mentalist, on 29 February 2012 - 10:10 PM, said:

Macros, on 29 February 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:

and now i think the dude is symping ja/grief.

marvelous stuff

yeah, i'm not a fan of that vote-remove vote move.

but, otoh, I feel that lynching JA on Day 1 altless would be too predictable.

Really Ment.... are you gonna suggest...dare I say it... signaling?

[The Dude]

Macros, on 29 February 2012 - 10:12 PM, said:

no, I mean you bringing up the only meaningful interaction, writing it off totally as shenanigans then pointing in the complete other directoin in a joking fashion.

THAT is what I mean, justify it bitch

I don't need to justify the fact that the grief/JA interaction is bogus. I think it's pretty obvious. But if you want to continue on with a JA vote that will lead to either Grief or JA being Lynched and coming back inno (which is a very probable outcome). Then by all means, go ahead. Like I said, If it's anything, it's grief being a symp and shitting up the thread.

[Mentalist]

The Dude, on 29 February 2012 - 10:13 PM, said:

Mentalist, on 29 February 2012 - 10:10 PM, said:

Macros, on 29 February 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:

and now i think the dude is symping ja/grief.

marvelous stuff

yeah, i'm not a fan of that vote-remove vote move.

but, otoh, I feel that lynching JA on Day 1 altless would be too predictable.

Really Ment.... are you gonna suggest...dare I say it... signaling?

you said it, not me

[Stalker]

The Dude, on 29 February 2012 - 09:58 PM, said:

This whole Grief/JA thing is weird. I think it was pretty clear that the vote was a joke, but JA's responses were odd.

Quote

The fact that Grief started the whole thing over an obvious joke vote is more suspicious to me than JA's reactions.

so to clarify, who did you think was more suspicious? Since your posts could go either way, saying first that JA seemed odd (I read suspicious), followed by saying that Grief was more suspicious.

[HoosierDaddy]

It was a bit curious that both Grief and Ment jumped on JA's vote.

Oh well. I'll happily lynch any of you assholes because so far we've got shit cap'n.

[Macros]

i'm off to work now, unsure how proficient my piece of shit phone will be for keeping up with an active thread, multiquotes are a real pain to scroll past.

back to game stuff. Now dude's calling grief the sytmp, I know you are but what am I, anyone?
IKYABWAI, write that down, its a thing.


Call me obtuse, nothing worse though or i'll hunt you down, but for now I'm contenjt with my notion that JA or Grief actually are scum and we happened to luck out with our day one bullshittery and the dude is involved somewhow.
its early days yet but I'm leaving my vote where it is until an actual case comes along.

[HoosierDaddy]

And we all know signalling happens and it's netted scum before. But, I'm obviously retarded for paying attention to see who accidentally fucks up and accidentally posts their master's name instead of the town player they were actually referencing.

[Mentalist]

The Dude, on 29 February 2012 - 10:17 PM, said:

Macros, on 29 February 2012 - 10:12 PM, said:

no, I mean you bringing up the only meaningful interaction, writing it off totally as shenanigans then pointing in the complete other directoin in a joking fashion.

THAT is what I mean, justify it bitch

I don't need to justify the fact that the grief/JA interaction is bogus. I think it's pretty obvious. But if you want to continue on with a JA vote that will lead to either Grief or JA being Lynched and coming back inno (which is a very probable outcome). Then by all means, go ahead. Like I said, If it's anything, it's grief being a symp and shitting up the thread.

k

who is he symping?