Korlat, on 10 January 2012 - 05:37 PM, said:
I see Osserics argument about voting him and analyzing who goes after him... but honestly, on day one scum doesn't need a lot of help to get a train started/rolling. So I don't really agree with his strategy. On the other hand, I don't get a scum vibe from osseric and i feel that we are doing our usual day 1 obsessing over a random detail that leads to an inno getting lynched.
Going to do a quick read through/skim of the thread, but doubt I will be voting Osseric or Okaros. Scum is laying in the weeds... I feel thats where we should be looking.
But that's not his argument, or mine for that matter at all. How is it humanly possible to read my posts on the subject (or Osseric's for that matter) and still come away with this cooky nonsense that you're drooling all over the thread? How? If you're not an idiot, and I'm going to assume you're not (see; charitable still) it would be the easiest thing in the world to read my explanation for my vote and realise that the arguments you're attacking above do not in fact exist. Or do you just prefer to attack non existing arguments in an attempt to seem to contribute when in fact you're not?
Kessobahn, on 10 January 2012 - 07:07 PM, said:
Osseric, on 10 January 2012 - 07:05 PM, said:
My theory is WIFOM. Yes, I said that. Trying to argue WIFOM is bad, yes. I'm not arguing WIFOM. Whether or not my theory is true, the argument is that now would be the best time to find out. There is no debating that. People can (and have) said that they'd rather not try it out at all. That's fine. You say that because my theory is WIFOM, it invalidates the argument that day 1 is the time to test this theory. That makes no sense.
sigh
my argument is simple
WIFOM is bad. period.
anyone bringing up wifom is bad for town. period
you bring up wifom.
your theory is wifom
ergo, you are bad for town. period
Oh for all that is holy! I don't even know how to not threat you like an idiot here. It's impossible. It's as if you purposefully went about finding ways to sabotage my resolution. "I don't like Sorrit being polite. If I act like a complete moron with the reading comprehension of a mitten he'll start being nasty again".
Or do you simply feel more comfortable hammering at a viewpoint that no one disagrees with and thus wont protest? Because that is what you seem to be doing here. Osseric painstakingly explains the difference between WIFOM and his arguments (and by extension my own) and all you seem capable of doing is river-dancing naked around the thread rubbing your balls on everyone while you yell "He said WIFOM!" at the top of your lungs.
Would it be too much to ask that instead of cluttering the thread with this drivel you actually argue with people based on what they said and not what you would have preferred that they said in order to make yourself look good?
Osseric, on 11 January 2012 - 04:10 AM, said:
Galayn Lord, on 11 January 2012 - 02:11 AM, said:
Sorrit's defense of Osseric is too blatant to be actual sympage, I think. Could be fake sympage, though.
Tulas did a drive-bye vote on Kessobahn.
Tiam is the vote-leader for being pretty much post-padding.
And, something just strikes me about Karat and his langugage. Pinging the scumdar.
I'd vote for all four of these people, but I'd honestly prefer the other three than Tiam who is at least blatant and mostly on the block for being worthless rather than being scummy.
I still think it's odd that Sorrit backed me up. Confused that someone agrees with me enough to vote with me, maybe.
I have no feel for Tulas at all. I hesitate to vote for low posters as of yet.
I'm not getting the Karat ping, but maybe that's just me.
I hesitate to vote Tiam for low posting on day 1. People who have roles sometimes low post on day 1.
I'm still pushing for an Okaros lynch.
If not, I would be the next best choice. I don't want you guys bogged down in speculation about me the whole day 2/3, that'd be annoying. Not doing an emo thing here, but I'm really not important and I'd rather lynch me than our finder or something.
It's odd in that we agree, yes. However, my defense of you in as much as it was one came about as a result of all these moronic attacks at your position by extension attacks my own. I prefer to argue my position and not some retarded caricature of the same.