Malazan Empire: Arthur C. Clarke - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Arthur C. Clarke Old-school SF

#1 User is offline   Werthead 

  • Ascendant
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 3,970
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 05 January 2012 - 08:07 PM

Childhood's End

Quote

Humanity is about to launch its first manned mission to another world. Finally, the human race is about to escape its cradle and take its first step towards the stars. But on the eve of the launch the skies over the Earth's major cities are blotted out by the appearance of huge, alien spacecraft. The Overlords have arrived, and nothing will ever be the same again.

Arthur C. Clarke is one of the most famous writers the science fiction field has ever produced, thanks to his work on the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey and his role as a popular science commentator (he covered several of the Apollo moon landings for American television and had several successful TV series in the 1980s). Clarke's work is notable for its straightforwardness (he was never a great prose stylist) but also its scientific rigour. With a few exceptions, Clarke had little truck with what he considered to be some of the more fantastical concepts of SF (such as faster-than-light travel and artificial gravity) and did not use them in his work. In his view, the universe is vast, timeless and unknowable. Much of Clarke's work is notable for a certain melancholic optimism: the human race can be much more than it is now, but even so is unlikely to challenge the vastness of the universe.

Childhood's End was published in 1953 and was his fourth novel, although his first published in the United States, where it immediately established him as a major voice in the field. In many ways it is atypical Clarke. The aliens are comprehensible and easily relate to human beings, unlike the enigmatic entities of say 2001 or Rendezvous with Rama. At the same time, his normal scientific vigour is a little slacker than normal, as concepts such as telepathy and group consciousnesses are explored (Clarke had a passing fascination with the supernatural at the time, though later firmly rejected such notions). Clarke's influences are clear, with the presence of Olaf Stapledon particularly hard to ignore.

The novel is extremely concise, with my paperback copy clocking in at 160 pages. For its short page count, the novel is fairly epic. It is split into three sections, each with a distinct cast, focus and storyline (unsurprising, as the first section was originally a stand-alone short story). In the first, the Secretary-General of the United Nations has to oversee the painful transformation of humanity from bickering nation-states to a single world government. In the second, a family 'escape' the Overlords' utopia to live in an island commune free of their influence, only to discover the real reason for the Overlords' arrival on Earth. In the final section, a lone human who stowed away aboard an Overlord ship returns to Earth eighty years later (though only a few months later by his count, due to time dilation) to find a world vastly changed from the one he left. Clarke doesn't waste a word as he lets the story unfold inexorably, moving to a conclusion that looms somewhere between awe-inspiring and horrific.

As a novelist, Clarke was much more interested in ideas (thematic, scientific or both) than people. His characterisation was often variable, although Childhood's End is actually one of his better books in that regard. Its major protagonists (even the Overlords) are clearly defined and sympathetic. In terms of structure, Childhood's End is unusual in that the entire story is pre-ordained, and nothing any of the characters do can change what is happening. They - and the reader - can only witness it and make their own minds up about whether it is something that can be called 'good' or not, and I suspect many will fall on the 'not' end of the spectrum.

As a result Childhood's End can be viewed as a colossal tragedy. The book has a tremendous emotional charge as it poses a simple question: how would we face it if our way of existing ended tomorrow? Clarke's answer is surprisingly bleak but, one suspects, one that would be close to the truth.

The novel has aged in some respects. The first edition opened with the USA and USSR battling to land a man on the moon, since Apollo 11 was still sixteen years in the future at the time it was published. Clarke also makes a very dated joke where he discusses how the Overlords have to force the rulers of South Africa to treat all their citizens equally regardless of skin colour. The 'joke' is that by this time majority rule in South Africa has been restored, and it's the white population that's being mistreated. An amusing aside in 1953 actually feels rather cynical today, assuming as it does that the African population would be as racist and authoritarian as the white one was. However, another point about how the people of Israel bitterly resist being absorbed into the Overlords' hegemony and giving up the freedom they have spent centuries fighting for, is more resonant. There's also a recurring problem in Clarke's work where he underestimates the power of religion, and the sequences where the Overlords' arrival causes the downfall of all world religions in a matter of months are rather unconvincing.

In most respects, Childhood's End (****½) has not aged badly at all, and its central themes of parenthood and the futility of railing against the night - but the effort nevertheless being laudable - remain interesting. The novel is available now in the UK and USA.

Visit The Wertzone for reviews of SF&F books, DVDs and computer games!


"Try standing out in a winter storm all night and see how tough you are. Start with that. Then go into a bar and pick a fight and see how tough you are. And then go home and break crockery over your head. Start with those three and you'll be good to go."
- Bruce Campbell on how to be as cool as he is
1

#2 User is offline   Avatar 

  • High Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 456
  • Joined: 22-February 09

Posted 05 January 2012 - 08:36 PM

I love some oldschool SF now and then. Posted Image I've read Childhood's End last year, I thought it was nice. Loved 2001 and Rama even more.
0

#3 User is offline   amphibian 

  • Ribbit
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 8,079
  • Joined: 28-September 06
  • Location:Upstate NY
  • Interests:Hopping around

Posted 05 January 2012 - 08:39 PM

From what my South African friend tells me, the majority government is often nearly as racist and authority-abusing as the old one was in terms of dealing with whites. There may be some hyperbole in there, but the general approach they are using is not a good one.
I survived the Permian and all I got was this t-shirt.
0

#4 User is offline   Salt-Man Z 

  • My pen halts, though I do not
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 4,169
  • Joined: 07-February 08
  • Location:Apple Valley, MN

Posted 05 January 2012 - 08:39 PM

Gotta disagree. I read Childhood's End for the first time probably 5 years ago; I thought it was dry and dull and felt like it hadn't aged well at all. I'm also not a fan of the way it felt like a series of semi-related short stories strung together to make a book (much the same reason I disliked Asimov's Foundation as well, though that one was in fact assembled out of short stories.) The idea behind the book was interesting, but 160 pages still felt like too many to devote to it, or at least the way Clarke wrote it.

Which is not to say I dislike Arthur C. Clarke at all; I loved Rendezvous with Rama, which was the first book of his I read.
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
0

#5 User is offline   Avatar 

  • High Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 456
  • Joined: 22-February 09

Posted 05 January 2012 - 09:12 PM

Good review btw!
0

#6 User is offline   Binder of Demons 

  • Lord of Light
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,617
  • Joined: 02-March 07
  • Location:Ireland
  • - Thread Killer -

Posted 06 January 2012 - 12:50 AM

Nice review Wert, must be over 20 years since i read it, as a result I wouldn't have entirely trusted my memory of how good it was. I think you pretty much nailed the strengths and weaknesses of CLARKE's work in that the idea was king, story second and characters third. While CHILDHOODS END ticks these boxes, and was a breakthrough for him as a n author, I remember being a much bigger fan of THE CITY AND THE STARS when i read it for the numbers of simple science ideas so far ahead of his time.

RENDEZVOUS WITH RAMA was a significant step forward for him I thought though, in that it felt more like and actual novel, rather than a collection of ideas stuck together into a story. One comment you made in the review with relation to his dealing with religion in the books struck me as kinda ironic. In most of his early works, he very clearly states his position as one of a belief in science over religion. And yet in his later years, he partnered up with a horribly dull writer called GENTRY LEE who proceeded to completely undo the grandeur of the RAMA series with some terribly ham-fisted pro religious drivel. Now don't get me wrong, it's not necessarily the aspect of religion that bothered me, but that it was so poorly done, poorly reasoned and so out of context to the start of the series that it felt completely incongruous even to my 15 year old self at the time.

Will be curious to see your opinion on any of his other works, if you are going to read them also.


P.S. Also nice to see a mention for OLAF STAPLEDON in the review, as CLARKE often cited him as an influence. His books were strange, and yet certainly impressive for their time. I found LAST AND FIRST MAN to be quite dry, but enjoyed STAR MAKER a lot more. You can pick them up as part of the Science Fiction MAsterworks series

It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt - Mark Twain

Never argue with an idiot!
They'll drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!
- Anonymous
0

#7 User is offline   D'iversify 

  • First Sword
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 647
  • Joined: 07-October 10

Posted 06 January 2012 - 11:14 AM

 amphibian, on 05 January 2012 - 08:39 PM, said:

From what my South African friend tells me, the majority government is often nearly as racist and authority-abusing as the old one was in terms of dealing with whites. There may be some hyperbole in there, but the general approach they are using is not a good one.
The main difference these days is that poor whites are not supported by the state and there is a healthy black middle class. There are still a good deal of well-off middle class whites and a lot of poor blacks and Cape coloureds, as before. There has been, however, a lot of creeping corruption in the ANC, and the racial quota system is infested with party cronyism. Rural white farmers have also been murdered in large numbers, though whether, as is claimed by some, this is about land and subliminal ethnic conflict, or more to do with organised (and disorganised) crime isn't clear as far as I know.
I am the Onyx Wizards
2

#8 User is offline   Werthead 

  • Ascendant
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 3,970
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 06 January 2012 - 08:57 PM

The later RAMA books are actually written by Gentry Lee alone, based on an outline he fleshed out along with Clarke (Clarke may also have done a polish and edit), explaining the shift in style. They are not great, though there were some effective scenes of horror in RAMA II (that were completely undermined by a BS retcon in the final book in the series). Both Clarke and Lee said they saw the later three books as one of several possible ways that the story could have unfolded, rather than the 'definitive continuation' of RENDEZVOUS WITH RAMA.
Visit The Wertzone for reviews of SF&F books, DVDs and computer games!


"Try standing out in a winter storm all night and see how tough you are. Start with that. Then go into a bar and pick a fight and see how tough you are. And then go home and break crockery over your head. Start with those three and you'll be good to go."
- Bruce Campbell on how to be as cool as he is
0

#9 User is offline   Orlion 

  • Captain
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 196
  • Joined: 26-January 11
  • Interests:Amontillado Tofu.

Posted 08 January 2012 - 04:54 PM

The worst thing about Clarke is he blatantly uses retcons. 2001 was great. Then, he retconned it in 2010 so it'd be 'truer to the movie'. Blargh, never mind 2061... which was completely forgettable, and 3001 where Frank Poole comes back to life and the monoliths are merely computer swiss army knives.

That, and towards the end he fell in love with the idea of a space elevator and had to have it in....every....single...novel thereafter.
0

#10 User is offline   Avatar 

  • High Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 456
  • Joined: 22-February 09

Posted 08 January 2012 - 05:18 PM

Quote

The worst thing about Clarke is he blatantly uses retcons. 2001 was great. Then, he retconned it in 2010 so it'd be 'truer to the movie'. Blargh, never mind 2061... which was completely forgettable, and 3001 where Frank Poole comes back to life and the monoliths are merely computer swiss army knives.<br style="color: rgb(28, 40, 55); font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; background-color: rgb(250, 251, 252); "><br style="color: rgb(28, 40, 55); font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; background-color: rgb(250, 251, 252); ">That, and towards the end he fell in love with the idea of a space elevator and had to have it in....every....single...novel thereafter.


True, these retcons were lame. And I would advise to skip every sequel to 2001.
0

#11 User is offline   Werthead 

  • Ascendant
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 3,970
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 08 January 2012 - 11:15 PM

I actually think the novel of 2010 is hugely superior to the book of 2001 (which is actually one of his weaker books, IMO, only notable for explaining WTF really happened at the end of the movie). 2061 has its moments but is unnecessary. 3001 is terrible. Some put it down to his age, but he was 'only' 80 when he wrote it, and the likes of Gene Wolfe and Jack Vance were still producing decent books at that age.
Visit The Wertzone for reviews of SF&F books, DVDs and computer games!


"Try standing out in a winter storm all night and see how tough you are. Start with that. Then go into a bar and pick a fight and see how tough you are. And then go home and break crockery over your head. Start with those three and you'll be good to go."
- Bruce Campbell on how to be as cool as he is
0

#12 User is offline   Orlion 

  • Captain
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 196
  • Joined: 26-January 11
  • Interests:Amontillado Tofu.

Posted 13 January 2012 - 06:42 PM

 Werthead, on 08 January 2012 - 11:15 PM, said:

I actually think the novel of 2010 is hugely superior to the book of 2001 (which is actually one of his weaker books, IMO, only notable for explaining WTF really happened at the end of the movie). 2061 has its moments but is unnecessary. 3001 is terrible. Some put it down to his age, but he was 'only' 80 when he wrote it, and the likes of Gene Wolfe and Jack Vance were still producing decent books at that age.

I wouldn't call it age, I just don't think Clarke was ever that creative. He had some ideas that he wanted to present, but could only come up with a few creative settings for them. As a result, the Oddessy series changed in setting to suit his presentation of ideas... and as a result, both were ruined.

I haven't run into any Gene Wolfe, but Jack Vance seems to suffer from exactly the opposite of Clarke: doesn't have a lot of ideas, but he was extremely creative. As a result, his stuff is enjoyable.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users