[Emurlahn]

Tennes, on 19 October 2011 - 05:21 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:15 PM, said:

Tennes, on 19 October 2011 - 05:14 PM, said:

I'm just presenting options. Lynch off Barghy if you see fit.

If that happens, Emur I would be more than willing to deal to remove the NK ( Korlat) posibility. come tomorrow

possibly. once I know you're not hiding a killer.
my original suggestion for the day was to remove the Yan hidden role, after all.

Well, that would seem more prudent in your position.

well, once I brought it up, Shelly started making waves, and for some reason I switched to thinking your death might be better.

i'm not adverse on gambling with Sima Yi, since I stand the least to lose form bringing him into play.

[Emurlahn]

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:22 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:22 PM, said:

Karosis, on 19 October 2011 - 05:19 PM, said:

i recon the best bet is to bring the yan back to level pegging and then we can see from there.

So either the hidden role or barghy then?


unless you want to gamble with the usurper?

taking out barg is pointless, imo

I say hidden role or Tennes

in fact

I believe that Tennes can protect his ppl. ensuring the barbs don't ge the upper hand at night.

remove vote



vote Telas

with 2 healers around, better chances your killer stays neutered. and we iether take out the usurper, or the hidden role.

and if it's the usurper, and no one dies, i'm open to business propoisitions regarding taking out the yan hidden tomorrow

Why would Tennes be able to protect his people when Sorrit died while on his tile?

I have no clue as to how anyone aside from Xia has been moving. I haven't moved all game.

if you'd rather vote off Tennes, then say so.

[Telas]

I'm more inclined to vote Barghast myself to be perfectly honest.

[Emurlahn]

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:22 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:19 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:16 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:13 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:12 PM, said:

Heh, and here I thought my game had been that of a headless chicken.

no you were a gagged headless chicken.
I was squirming since Day1.

It was an alluring sight indeed.

and you didn't capitalize on it. for shame.

I had a plan of sorts to ooze into the Xia faction by a little sympage, alas all this illumination and... other things ruined that whole thing.

well, I was glad to have you on the Luo Yang voting lock all the same.

still can't believe I deflected 3 consecutive barbarian lyynches in a row,

[Emurlahn]

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:26 PM, said:

I'm more inclined to vote Barghast myself to be perfectly honest.

why? PMs are the most harmless people on thread right now.

[Barghast]

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:26 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:22 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:19 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:16 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:13 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:12 PM, said:

Heh, and here I thought my game had been that of a headless chicken.

no you were a gagged headless chicken.
I was squirming since Day1.

It was an alluring sight indeed.

and you didn't capitalize on it. for shame.

I had a plan of sorts to ooze into the Xia faction by a little sympage, alas all this illumination and... other things ruined that whole thing.

well, I was glad to have you on the Luo Yang voting lock all the same.

still can't believe I deflected 3 consecutive barbarian lyynches in a row,

One cost you Omtose, though

[Barghast]

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:27 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:26 PM, said:

I'm more inclined to vote Barghast myself to be perfectly honest.

why? PMs are the most harmless people on thread right now.

Because it reduces the Yan to a size equal to yours and doesn't unleash the usurper, that's what I guess.

[Telas]

Ah, Omtose. I enjoyed that immensely.

Barghast is pretty obvious aint it?

If I'm the Usurper I'd prefer Barghast simply because I need another night to recruit. If I'm the Yan power role it's in my interest to kill the least important player.

[Karosis]

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:22 PM, said:

Karosis, on 19 October 2011 - 05:19 PM, said:

i recon the best bet is to bring the yan back to level pegging and then we can see from there.

So either the hidden role or barghy then?


unless you want to gamble with the usurper?

taking out barg is pointless, imo

I say hidden role or Tennes

in fact

I believe that Tennes can protect his ppl. ensuring the barbs don't ge the upper hand at night.

remove vote



vote Telas

with 2 healers around, better chances your killer stays neutered. and we iether take out the usurper, or the hidden role.

and if it's the usurper, and no one dies, i'm open to business propoisitions regarding taking out the yan hidden tomorrow

this makes sense...i could go this route.

[Emurlahn]

Barghast, on 19 October 2011 - 05:28 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:26 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:22 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:19 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:16 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:13 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:12 PM, said:

Heh, and here I thought my game had been that of a headless chicken.

no you were a gagged headless chicken.
I was squirming since Day1.

It was an alluring sight indeed.

and you didn't capitalize on it. for shame.

I had a plan of sorts to ooze into the Xia faction by a little sympage, alas all this illumination and... other things ruined that whole thing.

well, I was glad to have you on the Luo Yang voting lock all the same.

still can't believe I deflected 3 consecutive barbarian lyynches in a row,

One cost you Omtose, though

meh. I didn't know he was xia. in fact, i had pretty convincing PS evidence that he wouldn't be on my team.

I have no regrets about that lynch.

[Tennes]

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:26 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:22 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:19 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:16 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:13 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:12 PM, said:

Heh, and here I thought my game had been that of a headless chicken.

no you were a gagged headless chicken.
I was squirming since Day1.

It was an alluring sight indeed.

and you didn't capitalize on it. for shame.

I had a plan of sorts to ooze into the Xia faction by a little sympage, alas all this illumination and... other things ruined that whole thing.

well, I was glad to have you on the Luo Yang voting lock all the same.

still can't believe I deflected 3 consecutive barbarian lyynches in a row,

tell me about it...

[Emurlahn]

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:30 PM, said:

Ah, Omtose. I enjoyed that immensely.

Barghast is pretty obvious aint it?

If I'm the Usurper I'd prefer Barghast simply because I need another night to recruit. If I'm the Yan power role it's in my interest to kill the least important player.

you need another night?
my. you're slow

[Emurlahn]

Tennes, on 19 October 2011 - 05:33 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:26 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:22 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:19 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:16 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:13 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:12 PM, said:

Heh, and here I thought my game had been that of a headless chicken.

no you were a gagged headless chicken.
I was squirming since Day1.

It was an alluring sight indeed.

and you didn't capitalize on it. for shame.

I had a plan of sorts to ooze into the Xia faction by a little sympage, alas all this illumination and... other things ruined that whole thing.

well, I was glad to have you on the Luo Yang voting lock all the same.

still can't believe I deflected 3 consecutive barbarian lyynches in a row,

tell me about it...

well, it's not like you could be a visible leader, after Khell outed you like that....

[Emurlahn]

so, out of curiousity, since we're being all friendly-like:


who did kill sorritt?

[Telas]

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:34 PM, said:

Telas, on 19 October 2011 - 05:30 PM, said:

Ah, Omtose. I enjoyed that immensely.

Barghast is pretty obvious aint it?

If I'm the Usurper I'd prefer Barghast simply because I need another night to recruit. If I'm the Yan power role it's in my interest to kill the least important player.

you need another night?
my. you're slow

I might be. It's not a secret that the last week has passed me by.

[Barghast]

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:34 PM, said:

Well, it's not like you could be a visible leader, after Khell outed you like that....

I know I was slightly disappointed with Khell doing that....

[Barghast]

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:36 PM, said:

so, out of curiousity, since we're being all friendly-like:


who did kill sorritt?

i did. One shot vig.

[Telas]

Barghast, on 19 October 2011 - 05:39 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:36 PM, said:

so, out of curiousity, since we're being all friendly-like:


who did kill sorritt?

i did. One shot vig.

Why would you possibly want to do that?

[Emurlahn]

Barghast, on 19 October 2011 - 05:37 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:34 PM, said:

Well, it's not like you could be a visible leader, after Khell outed you like that....

I know I was slightly disappointed with Khell doing that....

he was doing okay. untill he posted as Mockra instead of Meanas.

[Telas]

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:42 PM, said:

Barghast, on 19 October 2011 - 05:37 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 19 October 2011 - 05:34 PM, said:

Well, it's not like you could be a visible leader, after Khell outed you like that....

I know I was slightly disappointed with Khell doing that....

he was doing okay. untill he posted as Mockra instead of Meanas.

That was the very moment I realised it was Khell. There was just no way it could be anyone else considering his title.