Help
Quote
drinksinbars, on 24 February 2011 - 09:40 AM, said:
Tapper, on 24 February 2011 - 09:15 AM, said:
Also, 3 kills is a lot on one day. If there's one vig, it was probably used on Silencer, which could be the vig thinking it was best to close one avenue of speculation... but since all we thought about Silencer was symp at best, that wouldn't deliver immediate pay off anyway. Would probably have been better to hold it until end-game.
The train stopping through a kill seems to be a deliberate scum strategy... twice now. Whether that is to deflect attention, as PB initially suggested, or an attempt to get us to get no lynch, I don't know, but it is somewhat interesting. And worrying.
The train stopping through a kill seems to be a deliberate scum strategy... twice now. Whether that is to deflect attention, as PB initially suggested, or an attempt to get us to get no lynch, I don't know, but it is somewhat interesting. And worrying.
its creating a massive amount of confusion so i would guess its a deliberate attempt to keep us off balance. I dont see the advantage though in scum stopping a lynch? Surely us lynching town by mistake is their goal?
Unless we feel 'obliged' to try to lynch the same person again the next day without much discussion. In that case, they get another kill without anyone paying attention to them.
I would suggest we ignore it tbh, as the wifom regarding their motivation will lead us nowhere.
there is plenty of content on thread regarding shin and ment this morning to worry about, without trying to determine if the scum had the dude or tattersail down as a symp. Hell taking out someone on a train is acting more like a catalyst than a block.
Well, that depends on how many of those online have already cast a vote - day 1, there was no-one left/willing to vote Tattersail bar himself, in the end. But I agree, doing it an hour before deadline when there are like 6 people left who haven't voted will see them place their own in quick succession.
Quote
As for yesterdays vote, trull made a few mistakes and I liked shins case. He never really responded to it either in a way I found satisfactory, but i think there isnt enough there to convince people as he just hasnt been about enough and like myself missed the end of yesterday. As for the ment vote, i think there is some merit in the case, and the heavy handed response to what i felt was a good case built by ansible stunk of smugness, but i cant help but think tapper is acting very protective of shin and is putting pressure on people in reaction to accusations. Ment seems to have been defending himself since the beginning, even before i felt there was any real pressure. Shin has been involved in making a few cases and although he is accussed of pushing or leading, it seems like he has been getting in early and riding the wave more than anything.
I can see how you'd see me protecting Shin, but that has not been my intention.
I didn't like the Dude's play since the end of day 1 where he voted for Silencer, and much less on day 2.
That was my reason for going after him.
I agree with your assessment of Ment at this point in time, but that is a thing from late day 2 and his reply to Ansible right now. As you can read, I saw nothing at all in lynching him day 1 and barely paid attention to him on day 2 apart from one minor exchange. That it came after a vote on Shin had nothing to do with Shin either, just with Ment suggesting I'm a symp - there has been some discussion on that subject, too, between Ment and Lizra.
