Mafia 70.5: The Stalwart Ma Teng A Tale of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms
#81
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:01 PM
Well, hey, it's an altless mini with 17 players, I'm not scum, and we actually got some decent day one spam going! Smooth is great if the game is serious, but I'm hardly ever on early enough to join in the spam.
***
Shinrei said:
<Vote Silencer> For not garnering any heat or any love for that matter. And I'm being serious here, it's like a mental block that is there, and you just keep forgetting it.
#82
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:07 PM
Trull, on 21 February 2011 - 09:45 PM, said:
HiddenOne, on 21 February 2011 - 09:41 PM, said:
I assume most things posted thus far have been feeble misdirections and downright tomfoolery. Silencer has been all over the place in the last few pages. Hard to tell if he's being serious half the time...
edit: two to few
Silencer is never serious..only smooth. It gets him in trouble from time to time.
Mafia 100 Champion. There can only be one!!!
Yossarian was sorry to hear that they had a mutual friend. It seemed there was a basis to their conversation after all.
Yossarian was sorry to hear that they had a mutual friend. It seemed there was a basis to their conversation after all.
#83
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:08 PM
Finally checkining in as well.
#84
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:09 PM
ansible, on 21 February 2011 - 09:58 PM, said:
Mentalist, on 21 February 2011 - 09:00 PM, said:
HiddenOne, on 21 February 2011 - 08:56 PM, said:
Vengeance, on 21 February 2011 - 08:39 PM, said:
HiddenOne, on 21 February 2011 - 08:26 PM, said:
I guess there's no reason to argue with that figure
Edit: Some lag there
Edit: Some lag there
What there is always a reason to argue. Unless your scum and have just decided to not argue anymore and announce to the world that your scum and it's wonderful. Are you scum?
Vengeance detective one oh one. Just ask stupid.
I disagree. Sometimes it just won't work. Although I've always loved to argue.
I think it's more like you're scum looking for some pals. So there.
?
are you implying he's looking for symps? without us knowing if there are symps?
sounds to me like you are hiding something...
And yet you brought up symps a few posts earlier:
Mentalist, on 21 February 2011 - 07:58 PM, said:
The Dude, on 21 February 2011 - 07:33 PM, said:
I'm at work. Here off n on.
So reading up on the rules. Iron man is different than what I thought. No nights what-so-ever. interesting.
So I guess i'll get the ball rolling. 17 players ( wtf at this by the way. 17 for a mini and can barely get enough together for a high tmdi game... so sad
) typical Town vs. Scum would say 13 town and 4 scum? Maybe 12-5?
So reading up on the rules. Iron man is different than what I thought. No nights what-so-ever. interesting.
So I guess i'll get the ball rolling. 17 players ( wtf at this by the way. 17 for a mini and can barely get enough together for a high tmdi game... so sad
i'd say 2 killers 1 symp. maybe 2 symps.
ofc, this depends on waht roles D'rek gave town.
So....Ment speculates on symp existence and numbers; HiddenOne suggests Vengy might be looking for symps; and then Ment calls HiddenOne scum for simply acknowledging the possibility of symps when Ment has already acknowledged said possibility?
Suspicious. Ment is clearly protecting Veng, who is symp-hunting.
Vote Mentalist
I am the Dude and I endorse this vote.
Mafia 100 Champion. There can only be one!!!
Yossarian was sorry to hear that they had a mutual friend. It seemed there was a basis to their conversation after all.
Yossarian was sorry to hear that they had a mutual friend. It seemed there was a basis to their conversation after all.
#85
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:09 PM
If this isn't spam, what is? My mind can't comprehend all of this in one shot...
#86
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:09 PM
Lizra, on 21 February 2011 - 10:08 PM, said:
Finally checkining in as well.
Can we get a vote count please.
..
....
.....
.......
.........
oops sorry, wrong game
Mafia 100 Champion. There can only be one!!!
Yossarian was sorry to hear that they had a mutual friend. It seemed there was a basis to their conversation after all.
Yossarian was sorry to hear that they had a mutual friend. It seemed there was a basis to their conversation after all.
#87
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:10 PM
Clearly my dastardly plan to confuse EVERYONE is working wonderfully. Man, I haven't had this much fun on day one in aaaaages.
***
Shinrei said:
<Vote Silencer> For not garnering any heat or any love for that matter. And I'm being serious here, it's like a mental block that is there, and you just keep forgetting it.
#88
#89
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:11 PM
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#90
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:12 PM
I like how everyone logs in anonymously. If I were your mod and this was alted, I'd be really proud of you all.
Now, I'll be getting me some wine and read some more tCG.
Now, I'll be getting me some wine and read some more tCG.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#91
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:15 PM
Tapper, on 21 February 2011 - 10:12 PM, said:
I like how everyone logs in anonymously. If I were your mod and this was alted, I'd be really proud of you all.
Now, I'll be getting me some wine and read some more tCG.
Now, I'll be getting me some wine and read some more tCG.
Bastard.
I love how everyone thinks logging in anon will do them any good. You know, given Grief and I can see them all. And that we've been explicitly banned from speaking about when people are online...
***
Shinrei said:
<Vote Silencer> For not garnering any heat or any love for that matter. And I'm being serious here, it's like a mental block that is there, and you just keep forgetting it.
#92
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:16 PM
#93
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:16 PM
#94
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:21 PM
Ugh. Somehow, my computer made itself go back one page when I was typing an awesome and gloating message about my prolific-ness and spammy-ness and how this is comparatively mild spam. And how it's worse for you because you're reading it in real time-ish. Instead of reading up later, when you can look for things without getting confused. And I lost it. It was awesome. And gloaty. Dammit.
Ah well, the above gives you the gist of things.
Ah well, the above gives you the gist of things.
***
Shinrei said:
<Vote Silencer> For not garnering any heat or any love for that matter. And I'm being serious here, it's like a mental block that is there, and you just keep forgetting it.
#95
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:26 PM
Profile of Silencer: Smooth, arrogant, a pain in the a**
#96
#97
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:28 PM
Oh, come on, SMOOTH. You're calling me SMOOTH. NOW? >.<
Also, I like the way that all the veterans seem to have scattered and generally fled the thread.
Also, I like the way that all the veterans seem to have scattered and generally fled the thread.
***
Shinrei said:
<Vote Silencer> For not garnering any heat or any love for that matter. And I'm being serious here, it's like a mental block that is there, and you just keep forgetting it.
#98
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:29 PM
Everybody's calling you that, and my profile is a GENERAL profile of you. Geez, what'd you expect?
#99
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:32 PM
Yeah, but most of the people are calling me that tongue-in-cheek right at the moment. Or, they'd better be. D:<
And if it's a general profile, the last one is hardly fair! That's just this game!
And if it's a general profile, the last one is hardly fair! That's just this game!
***
Shinrei said:
<Vote Silencer> For not garnering any heat or any love for that matter. And I'm being serious here, it's like a mental block that is there, and you just keep forgetting it.
#100
Posted 21 February 2011 - 10:34 PM
Fine then, a GENERAL profile with hints of personal opinion

Help

















