Iamme, on 09 February 2011 - 01:37 PM, said:
This is a story of Malazans and Cripple God. The story from very beginning revolved around Fallen One the Malazans. Those who don't affect the end result are bound to end up being loose ends.
Fixed, since the Fallen One is mentioned all of 1.5 times in volumes one and two, and has little to no hand in the main story arc of either novel.
As for the OP's point, I think this is going to be an interesting and possibly contentious point of discussion on these boards and elsewhere after tCG is released. By my thinking, it's going to get particularly hairy when people have a (understandably) difficult time separating themselves from characters they love who may not see full closure or resolution in the 10th volume. Your example of Karsa is perfect. If you're a fan of Karsa, you want to see more of him, and you want him to have some part in the ultimate resolution of the main arc. But it's possible that he's already had his own resolution in the main arc (killing Rhulad and rendezvousing with Dassem and his daughters) and SE is content to pick his thread back up in another trilogy. I don't think this would speak to any deficit in the narrative structure of the main, 10-volume series. I don't think it would constitute a lack of resolution on a crucial plot front the same, say, as if SE decided not to bring closure to someone like Quick Ben, or Tavore. But I can understand how some readers who have particular favorites might be jilted.
As I finish writing that, I realize I'm really making no point at all, and that I'm setting up a ridiculously slippery slope regarding questions like what constitutes effective resolution and which characters have already seen it/should see it. All we can do (as the OP said) is have faith, wait and hope. I am mentally preparing myself for being - on some level - unsatisfied. By that I don't mean displeased or disappointed. Rather, I think that the old adage of SE not leading his readers around by the hand will prove especially true in the final estimation - in the same way he hasn't spoon fed us all along, he's not going to end with a neatly arranged and perfectly packaged installment.
If nothing else, it's cool to me that even before it's release, a book like this can generate so much discussion and thought around, say, what constitutes good resolution. That's saying something about SE in and of itself right there.
This post has been edited by Ciceronian: 09 February 2011 - 02:03 PM