Malazan Empire: The Mars Trilogy by Kim Stanley Robinson - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Mars Trilogy by Kim Stanley Robinson The story of the colonisation of Mars over 200 years

#1 User is offline   Werthead 

  • Ascendant
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 3,957
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 21 June 2010 - 09:02 PM

Red Mars

Quote

2027. A hundred of Earth's most skilled engineers and scientists are dispatched to Mars, braving radiation exposure to land on the Red Planet and establish a permanent scientific outpost. Their goal is to establish whether Mars can ever be a viable target for settlement and colonisation, and if terraforming the planet is possible or desirable.

Earth is overcrowded and choking, with national governments and transnational supercorporations (whose annual balance sheets outstrip the GDPs of most of the world's countries) feuding for control. Soon, vast reservoirs of water are discovered in hidden aquifers deep below the Martian surface, making colonies self-sustainable. To the transnats, this means that Mars can become a dumping ground for Earth's excess population. When valuable mineral deposits that Earth is crying out for are also discovered on Mars, then its exploitation for the benefit of the people of Earth becomes inevitable. The resulting clash of wills and desires of the transnational Earth corporations and the beleaguered settlers on Mars forced to accept hundreds of thousands of immigrants they cannot cope with can only have one possible outcome: revolution, and the cry for independence.

Kim Stanley Robinson's epic Mars Trilogy chronicles humanity's colonisation of Mars, beginning in the early 21st Century and extending over a period of some two centuries. The first book, which covers a period of some forty years, sees the initial settling of Mars by the First Hundred, the welcome arrival of additional waves of colonists intent on scientific research and then the more challenging problems of the arrival of hundreds of thousands of economic migrants, refugees and outcasts on a world that is not ready for them, and the resulting tensions between the newcomers and old-timers, and between the authorities on Mars and Earth.

The success of the trilogy as a whole is debatable, but this first volume, at least, is a masterpiece. Robinson's story rotates through a number of POV characters amongst the initial settlers, the First Hundred, and it rapidly becomes clear that most of them are somewhat unreliable narrators. Maya's complaints in her own POV of her 'important problems' being ignored by the base psychiatrist are given another perspective in her friend Nadia's POV, which reveals Maya is more interested in a trivial love triangle between herself and two Americans rather than in the colonisation of Mars, whilst the psychiatrist Michel's POV reveals that he is giving Maya colossal amounts of time and attention (to the detriment of his own mental health) which is unappreciated. Robinson repeats this trick several times, showing that the ultra-laidback and inspirational John Boone (the First Man on Mars) achieves his famous demeanour through the assistance of addictive drugs, whilst self-deprecating Nadia is actually the most universally-respected of the First Hundred. Character is thus built up in layers, from both internal viewpoints and external sources, making these central characters very well-realised (although characters outside the central coterie can be a little on the thin side).

Whilst the characters are important, it is Mars itself which is the central figure of the book. Robinson brings a dead planet to vivid life, emphasising the differences in terrain and character between the frozen northern polar icecap and the water-cut channels in the depths of the Valles Marineris, with the massive mountains of Tharsis towering high into the atmosphere and colonists eagerly staking claims to future beachfront properties in Hellas, the lowest point on Mars and the first place to see the benefits of terraforming. The ideas of Mars as it is now as a pristine, beautiful but harsh landscape and the habitable world it could be are sharply contrasted, and the rights and wrongs of terraforming form a core argument of the novel. I get the impression that Robinson sides with Ann Clayborne's view that the planet should be left untouched, but he is realistic enough to know this will not happen, if Mars can be settled and exploited in a way that is economically feasible. Mars in this work becomes a success of SF worldbuilding to compete with Helliconia and Arrakis, losing only a few points for actually existing.

On the downside, Robinson hits a few bad notes. Some of these are unavoidable consequences of the book being nearly twenty years old. Even in 1992 the notion that the Chinese would not play a major role in the financing and undertaking of a Mars colonisation mission only forty years hence was somewhat fanciful, but today it is almost unthinkable. More notably, the global recession has made the possibility of a manned mission to Mars, let alone a full-scale colonisation effort, by the 2020s somewhat dubious. Of course, these are issues Robinson could not hope to predict in the optimistic, post-Soviet Union years of the early 1990s.


Other problems are more notable. Robinson goes to some lengths to make the pro-terraforming and anti-terraforming sides of the debate both understandable and intelligent, but his political sympathies are much more one-sided. The pro-Martian independence brigade have charismatic leaders and a grass-roots movement of plucky, honest-men-against-the-machine supporters to their name, whilst the pro-Earth-control movement is led by a fundamentalist conservative Christian and resorts to weapons and mass-slaughter extremely easily. Robinson, to his credit, recognises this problem in later books and tries to repair the damage somewhat (Phyllis, presented extremely negatively in Red Mars, is shown in a more sympathetic light in later volumes), but there remains a feeling of political bias in this first volume. In addition, it sometimes feels that Robinson really wants the reader to know about the years of research he put into the book, with tangents and divergences which make the book feel like half a novel and half a factual science volume on how the possible colonisation of Mars might happen. For those fascinated by the real-life plans to terraform Mars (like me) this isn't an issue, but for some it may be. It is also, by far, the biggest problem the sequels face.

Nevertheless, the sheer, massive scope and complexity of Red Mars makes up for this. There is an overwhelming feeling running through this novel unlike almost any other hard SF novel ever published, that this might actually happen. Maybe not as soon as 2027, maybe not with such a determined push towards colonisation and terraforming right from the off, but one day, barring the collapse of our civilisation, we will go to Mars, and many of the challenges and problems faced by the First Hundred in this book are issues that will need to be overcome to make that possibility a reality.

Plus, and this cannot be undervalued, the dry and more sedentary tone of the earlier parts of the book are made up for by the final 100 pages or so, which contains one sequence which ranks amongst the most memorable and stunning moments of SF imagery achieved in the history of the genre to date. Robinson may have the image of being a bit of a laidback Californian optimist, but he sets to blowing stuff up at the end of the book with a relish that makes even Greg Bear look unambitious.

Red Mars (****½) is an awe-inspiring feat of SF worldbuilding and a vital novel on the colonisation of our neighbouring world, let down by a few moments of naivete and simplistic straw-manning of political points of view not to Robinson's liking. Overcoming this, the central characters are fascinating, the sheer scope of the book is stunning and the climatic revolution sequence is dramatic and spectacular. The novel is available (with a nice new British cover) in the UK and USA.

Visit The Wertzone for reviews of SF&F books, DVDs and computer games!


"Try standing out in a winter storm all night and see how tough you are. Start with that. Then go into a bar and pick a fight and see how tough you are. And then go home and break crockery over your head. Start with those three and you'll be good to go."
- Bruce Campbell on how to be as cool as he is
0

#2 User is offline   Illuyankas 

  • Retro Classic
  • Group: The Hateocracy of Truth
  • Posts: 7,254
  • Joined: 28-September 04
  • Will cluck you up

Posted 21 June 2010 - 10:00 PM

I absolutely loved this book, and to a slightly lesser extent the series, to pieces.

This:

View PostWerthead, on 21 June 2010 - 09:02 PM, said:

Nevertheless, the sheer, massive scope and complexity of Red Mars makes up for this. There is an overwhelming feeling running through this novel unlike almost any other hard SF novel ever published, that this might actually happen. Maybe not as soon as 2027, maybe not with such a determined push towards colonisation and terraforming right from the off, but one day, barring the collapse of our civilisation, we will go to Mars, and many of the challenges and problems faced by the First Hundred in this book are issues that will need to be overcome to make that possibility a reality.

Is one of the reasons.

And this:

View PostWerthead, on 21 June 2010 - 09:02 PM, said:

Plus, and this cannot be undervalued, the dry and more sedentary tone of the earlier parts of the book are made up for by the final 100 pages or so, which contains one sequence which ranks amongst the most memorable and stunning moments of SF imagery achieved in the history of the genre to date. Robinson may have the image of being a bit of a laidback Californian optimist, but he sets to blowing stuff up at the end of the book with a relish that makes even Greg Bear look unambitious.

Is oh so much another.

This, and to a lesser extent Stephen Baxter's Ring, is what got me into hard scifi in the beginning.
Hello, soldiers, look at your mage, now back to me, now back at your mage, now back to me. Sadly, he isn’t me, but if he stopped being an unascended mortal and switched to Sole Spice, he could smell like he’s me. Look down, back up, where are you? You’re in a warren with the High Mage your cadre mage could smell like. What’s in your hand, back at me. I have it, it’s an acorn with two gates to that realm you love. Look again, the acorn is now otataral. Anything is possible when your mage smells like Sole Spice and not a Bole brother. I’m on a quorl.
0

#3 User is offline   amphibian 

  • Ribbit
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 8,073
  • Joined: 28-September 06
  • Location:Upstate NY
  • Interests:Hopping around

Posted 21 June 2010 - 10:36 PM

View PostWerthead, on 21 June 2010 - 09:02 PM, said:

The success of the trilogy as a whole is debatable, but this first volume, at least, is a masterpiece.

Why is it debatable? To me, the Mars trilogy is one of the landmarks of the field - on a level with just about anything ever done in hard SF.

Quote

Robinson's story rotates through a number of POV characters amongst the initial settlers, the First Hundred [...] Character is thus built up in layers, from both internal viewpoints and external sources, making these central characters very well-realised (although characters outside the central coterie can be a little on the thin side).

Coming from the Helliconia books, how do you feel about the difference in how the authors handled the story? Specifically, I'm talking about Robinson's decision to make the First Hundred essentially immortal characters versus Helliconia's transition to a new set of characters for each book. Both deal with planetary change on a massive, massive scope, as well as social and economic turmoil, but it seems to me that having a generally static set of characters to pay attention to cut down the adjustment process the reader goes through and allows a bit more connection to the story. But, in the hands of a great writer, the opposite could be done well - are the Helliconia books as good as the Mars trilogy in their own way?

As for the planetary science stuff, I viewed it much like the whaling stuff in Moby Dick. You can take it out and still have a pretty good story, but for a reader truly interested in the stuff, it feeds the brain enormously to wrap itself around the concepts and envision things like that. I was very much in favor of the Sax chapters.
I survived the Permian and all I got was this t-shirt.
0

#4 User is offline   HoosierDaddy 

  • Believer
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 8,049
  • Joined: 30-June 08
  • Location:Indianapolis
  • Interests:Football

Posted 21 June 2010 - 11:30 PM

I extremely enjoyed Red Mars. I haven't given Blue or Green Mars a try yet. I really enjoyed the opening portions of the book and closing portion of the book, while muddying through the middle. The selection process, journey out, and initial settling of Mars was brilliant. And, the political showdown at the end of the book was quite well done as well. While the middle was intriguing, I thought it suffered at the hands of a character I had zero sympathy for: Maya. She seemed as narcissistic as they come. However, it does build up the two camps in what becomes a brilliant conclusion.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
0

#5 User is offline   ansible 

  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 449
  • Joined: 20-January 10
  • Location:Location:Location

Posted 22 June 2010 - 02:09 AM

View PostH.D., on 21 June 2010 - 11:30 PM, said:

I extremely enjoyed Red Mars. I haven't given Blue or Green Mars a try yet. I really enjoyed the opening portions of the book and closing portion of the book, while muddying through the middle. The selection process, journey out, and initial settling of Mars was brilliant. And, the political showdown at the end of the book was quite well done as well. While the middle was intriguing, I thought it suffered at the hands of a character I had zero sympathy for: Maya. She seemed as narcissistic as they come. However, it does build up the two camps in what becomes a brilliant conclusion.


I'm there with you; I loved Red Mars, and own the other two, but haven't read them yet. I really enjoyed the details he gave about setting up the camp and building the settlement.
We sail in and out of Time, then back again. There is only one ship, the captain says. All the ships we hail between the galaxies or suns are this ship.
0

#6 User is offline   Salt-Man Z 

  • My pen halts, though I do not
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 4,169
  • Joined: 07-February 08
  • Location:Apple Valley, MN

Posted 22 June 2010 - 02:41 AM

I also read the first book and thought it was great. I started the second, but didn't get very far in it. Then I discovered Stephen R. Donaldson and set it aside for good. Someday maybe I'll get back to it.
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
0

#7 User is offline   Soulessdreamer 

  • Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 266
  • Joined: 25-December 08
  • Location:Hill of Bitter Memories, the City of Sails, in the Land of the Long White Cloud
  • Interests:Sword fighting, HEMA, roleplaying, reading (fantasy and sci fi), weapons and Gaming (PC and Xbox)

Posted 22 June 2010 - 02:48 AM

Once I wraped my head around the concept that the First Hundred (if not all the characters in the books) were bugfuck nuts and that the 1st 100 couldn't veiw anyone else but the 1st 100 as a people I found the trilogy much more understandable and enjoyable.

Then again maybe only the insane can dream and expect to accomplish the fantastic visions of the future the 1st hundred presued in the books.

TTFN
Imagine a world without such souls.
Yes, it should have been harder to do.
0

#8 User is offline   Binder of Demons 

  • Lord of Light
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 1,617
  • Joined: 02-March 07
  • Location:Ireland
  • - Thread Killer -

Posted 22 June 2010 - 05:07 AM

The first book is easily the strongest, with the characters well thought out, and the scenarios they face seeming plausible. I personally remember really enjoying Green Mars too, as they was a very particular goal to be achieved, namely terraforming the planet.

I had a lot more difficulty with Blue Mars, in that it seemed to get bogged down in all the political musings, and I never quite got around to finishing it. I may have to go and dig it out at the library now, and see if was really that slow.

Still, the first book is well worth a read.

It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt - Mark Twain

Never argue with an idiot!
They'll drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!
- Anonymous
0

#9 User is offline   maro 

  • Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 229
  • Joined: 14-November 09

Posted 22 June 2010 - 05:17 AM

A fantastic series.

Those who have stopped on Red Mars, get into the rest - existentialism reigns.

These books make you think.

Coyote! :D
0

#10 User is offline   alt146 

  • Here comes the Strongbad!
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 827
  • Joined: 29-September 08
  • Location:Pretoria ZA

Posted 22 June 2010 - 06:34 AM

I also really enjoyed the trilogy, although it does feel a little dry at times. Especially in the third book, where the series starts to veer more towards the socio-economic situation of a fully established martian colony, rather that the scientific focus of the the first two books, which I found much more interesting. Still, it is definitely one of the most realistic SciFi books you will ever read.
[url="http://www.alt146.zzl.org"]MafiaManager[/url]: My Mafia Modding tool - Now at v0.3b

With great power comes a great integral of energy over time.
0

#11 User is offline   amphibian 

  • Ribbit
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 8,073
  • Joined: 28-September 06
  • Location:Upstate NY
  • Interests:Hopping around

Posted 22 June 2010 - 11:15 AM

View PostSoulessdreamer, on 22 June 2010 - 02:48 AM, said:

Once I wraped my head around the concept that the First Hundred (if not all the characters in the books) were bugfuck nuts and that the 1st 100 couldn't veiw anyone else but the 1st 100 as a people I found the trilogy much more understandable and enjoyable.

Then again maybe only the insane can dream and expect to accomplish the fantastic visions of the future the 1st hundred presued in the books.

TTFN

Ever hear of Dunbar's number? It's a concept that humans can maintain true, stable relationships with a certain amount of people. The research I've seen points to a much lower number than 150 - more like 50. Robinson may have been working off some similar concept, or perhaps trying to keep the cast of characters somewhat manageable.

I found the social dynamics and economic considerations to be an organic part of the books, as Robinson was upfront about exploring the interactions of the First Hundred as the sole settlers, as the leaders of a burgeoning community and as respected figures not necessarily the leaders of a mostly independent world. It came off as a futuristic examination of an 18th colony from establishment to independence (the parallels to Britain/the United States were strong), and the social dynamics were interesting in that I thought they were well-written, but perhaps a bit naive in how the constitution would be concretely applied.

It's interesting that Robinson gave the characters functional immortality, but chose to give then mental vulnerabilities over a period of time. Messing with something like telomerase shortening is some seriously complicated science, and yet these people can't keep their neurons intact? To me, Richard Morgan's Kovacs books are in a similar vein, despite being a futuristic Sam Spade series. Morgan decided to do the converse and keep the aging process, but toss out the mental vulnerabilities. Interesting stuff.
I survived the Permian and all I got was this t-shirt.
0

#12 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 22,435
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 22 June 2010 - 01:33 PM

Not a series i have much love for. I was intrigued by the first, bored by the second, and couldn't finish the third. The interminable existential 'where are we going as a human race' debates just rotted my interest.

As a concept, it's a great story, but i found that the execution wanders too far from the 'Mars as a future habitable planet' concept into sheer socio-philosophical debate/wasteland.

I also found that while the First 100 started off interesting, they eroded into either sterotypes/archetypes or indistinguishable old people having sex.

Just my $0.02 - i see why other people love it. I just find terraforming a planet more interesting than dull intellectual navel-gazing and the books shifted focus too far from the former to the latter to hold my interest.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#13 User is offline   Salt-Man Z 

  • My pen halts, though I do not
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 4,169
  • Joined: 07-February 08
  • Location:Apple Valley, MN

Posted 22 June 2010 - 02:38 PM

Has anyone here read the fourth book, The Martians? I guess it's a bunch of short stories that take place throughout the trilogy.
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
0

#14 User is offline   McLovin 

  • Cutlery Enthusiast
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 2,828
  • Joined: 19-March 04
  • Location:Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Interests:Knives. Stabbing. Stabbing with knives.

Posted 22 June 2010 - 04:48 PM

Like most readers, loved Red Mars, enjoyed Green Mars, didn't much care for Blue Mars. Kind of disappointing how the series finished since it started so strong.

I read The Martians - just various odds and ends that didn't make it into the trilogy, and frankly for good reason as it was just random boring crap.
OK, I think I got it, but just in case, can you say the whole thing over again? I wasn't really listening.
0

#15 User is offline   MTS 

  • Fourth Investiture
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 4,334
  • Joined: 02-April 07
  • Location:Terra Australis

Posted 22 June 2010 - 05:35 PM

Haven't yet read this (I'm woefully under-read in the sci-fi department), but this thread has convinced me to at least give Red Mars a go. One question though: what the hell is 'hard sci-fi'? The nerd writer on Party Down always haughtily explains to people that he writes 'hard sci-fi' but I've never really got what distinguished hard from soft.
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.

Si hoc adfixum in obice legere potes, et liberaliter educatus et nimis propinquus ades.
0

#16 User is offline   Bauchelain the Evil 

  • Greatest necromancer ever
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 1,859
  • Joined: 15-March 08
  • Location:Italy
  • Not much

Posted 22 June 2010 - 05:41 PM

Usually for hard sci-fi you mean a sci-fi book based where the science elements are meticulously described and that could actually be pulled off.
Adept of Team Quick Ben

I greet you as guests and so will not crush the life from you and devour your soul with peals of laughter. No, instead, I will make tea-Gothos
0

#17 User is offline   MTS 

  • Fourth Investiture
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 4,334
  • Joined: 02-April 07
  • Location:Terra Australis

Posted 22 June 2010 - 05:51 PM

So:
Star Wars= soft sci-fi
Neuromancer= hard sci-fi (first that came to mind)

?
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.

Si hoc adfixum in obice legere potes, et liberaliter educatus et nimis propinquus ades.
0

#18 User is offline   Bauchelain the Evil 

  • Greatest necromancer ever
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 1,859
  • Joined: 15-March 08
  • Location:Italy
  • Not much

Posted 22 June 2010 - 05:55 PM

Basically yes
Adept of Team Quick Ben

I greet you as guests and so will not crush the life from you and devour your soul with peals of laughter. No, instead, I will make tea-Gothos
0

#19 User is offline   HoosierDaddy 

  • Believer
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 8,049
  • Joined: 30-June 08
  • Location:Indianapolis
  • Interests:Football

Posted 22 June 2010 - 06:01 PM

Star Wars is fantasy. I don't know why it gets labeled Sci-Fi. Midichlorians are a horrific, blasphemous ret-con and take away fantastical aspects to it. The Force is magic. Magic is fantasy. And, no sufficiently advanced technology quotes, please.

Star Trek is I think a better example of a less detail oriented Sci-Fi.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
0

#20 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 22,435
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 22 June 2010 - 06:35 PM

Basically, soft sci fi is to hard sci fi what soft porn is to hard porn.

Only with lasers.

- Abyss, ...what?
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users