[Silencer]

@Grief and tomorrow with one NK it's 3v2 and we have the same scenario. I don't like speed lynching, we've had one of those already today, and I'm quite happy with just the single lynch, thank you very much. Besides which I'm top of the list for being that lynch, and if you guys do go that way you'll have 5 votes instead of 4 flying towards my head. I'm avoiding voting because we quite simply don't have enough info, so how the shit are we meant to vote now? Better to narrow the field overnight and see what happens when we have a full day to play things through, imo.

[Silencer]

In any case, I'm now honestly off to bed before I can't get up in the morning. So see you all on the morrow (or not).

[dktorode]

Edrigan, on 14 July 2010 - 12:52 PM, said:

I'm not strawmanning shit.
You said you felt confident with the cases and the names already been thrown down.
I wana find out where that confidence comes from, so I can decide if you're on my side or not.

Sometimes when you can't pinpoint scum accurately you can just look out for people you believe are on your side as well, and go from there.

Personally, I wouldn't have minded an Alt lynch. I simply wanted to see if you believed that would be a bad idea, and why.
Simple as that.

Yes i was confident with my case on Ment and with yours on HMQB and the two cases all made sense independently and together.
There is nothing wrong with having confidence on once own conviction....even if you are wrong.

I never once said i was confident that ALT is inno...fuck... YOU said i that.
Simply because i do not mention a persons name does not automatically make me think he is innocent.

I never mentioned yourself or grief name as suspects at the same time yet you put myself and Alt together?
Why not Grief too?...fuck i dont like the way you and grief are sucking each other off right now.

[Grief]

Or two NKs and we lose.

You're confident that their won't be two. I've no way of knowing if you're telling the truth about the vig or not.

As you say, night is unlikely. You're just stalling.

[Grief]

DK, you do realise that if you swap Edrigan for alt, what you are saying basically applies to what you are saying about me.

[Grief]

DK, would you be willing to vote alt?

[dktorode]

Grief, on 14 July 2010 - 01:01 PM, said:

DK, you do realise that if you swap Edrigan for alt, what you are saying basically applies to what you are saying about me.

say what now?

[dktorode]

Grief, on 14 July 2010 - 01:02 PM, said:

DK, would you be willing to vote alt?

Perhaps...earlier i would have.
but now i dont trust you and Ed

Ed especailly for his bullshit strawmanning.

[Grief]

The stuff about strawmanning.

I don't mention edrigan, because I don't think he's as likely scum as you, alt, and silencer.

Similarly, you haven't been mentioning alt. If you thought he was as likely to be scum as the people you are mentioning, why wouldn't you mention him?

Also, I notice alt is online. He has been rather absent from this discussion.

[Grief]

Well, it's kind of easier for me to dismiss Ed, since I know i'm not partners with him, and because I can't really see him as a partner with any one else.

[dktorode]

Grief, on 14 July 2010 - 01:06 PM, said:

The stuff about strawmanning.

I don't mention edrigan, because I don't think he's as likely scum as you, alt, and silencer.

Similarly, you haven't been mentioning alt. If you thought he was as likely to be scum as the people you are mentioning, why wouldn't you mention him?

Also, I notice alt is online. He has been rather absent from this discussion.

I also never mentioned Edrigan and yourself...

I cant point fingers at fucking EVERYBODY.

[dktorode]

Grief, on 14 July 2010 - 01:07 PM, said:

Well, it's kind of easier for me to dismiss Ed, since I know i'm not partners with him, and because I can't really see him as a partner with any one else.

Well yes that does wonders for my confidence in you two not being scum partners

[Edrigan]

dktorode, on 14 July 2010 - 12:59 PM, said:

Yes i was confident with my case on Ment and with yours on HMQB and the two cases all made sense independently and together.
There is nothing wrong with having confidence on once own conviction....even if you are wrong.

I never once said i was confident that ALT is inno...fuck... YOU said i that.
Simply because i do not mention a persons name does not automatically make me think he is innocent.

I never mentioned yourself or grief name as suspects at the same time yet you put myself and Alt together?
Why not Grief too?...fuck i dont like the way you and grief are sucking each other off right now.

It's fine with Ment, I was getting the same vibes as well.
Don't say I strawmann you. In the same way you're asking why I haven't poked Grief yet, its because he ranks lowest in my list of suspects.

EVERYONE is guilty in my eyes, until proven innocent. So I rank people accordingly, and take stabs , and go from there. Grief got the lowest spot by default, not because he doesnt look scumy, but because OTHERS look scummiest than him.
In the same way, I thought you rank Alt lowest in your book, that's why I wanted to hear more from you on the subject.

Ment revealed, and checking the code he claims, its there in the posts. Now we have to decide if we want to believe him or not.
However Silencer revealed too. Again we have to decide if we want to believe him or not, and decide how good a move was to vig in Day 1, with so little info going on.On top of that he votes night, confident there will not be a second kill.

We can't simply wait until we get HMQBs CF, and not talk about anything.
We still have a couple hours to go.

[Grief]

dktorode, on 14 July 2010 - 01:11 PM, said:

Grief, on 14 July 2010 - 01:07 PM, said:

Well, it's kind of easier for me to dismiss Ed, since I know i'm not partners with him, and because I can't really see him as a partner with any one else.

Well yes that does wonders for my confidence in you two not being scum partners

Yeah, course it's not helpful since you can't tell, but that's where i'm coming from.

[dktorode]

Blah blah blah

I don't believe you two fuckers one single bit.

Vote night

Ill take my chances that Silencer is telling the truth thank you very much.
I dont see how this game could have two kills for the killers at night in the first place.

[Grief]

Well, since PB was inno, Ment is CI.


I'd like to hear who alt thinks is scum.

[Grief]

So, that's two night votes. If you are inno alt, please don't vote night.

[dktorode]

Grief, on 14 July 2010 - 01:16 PM, said:

So, that's two night votes. If you are inno alt, please don't vote night.

The way i see it you have one kill and you want one more inno lynch to take the game

meh...voting night is not the end of the world

[alt146]

vote night

[Grief]

Unless there are two kills, whereas we lose.

There must be at least one inno on the night train, for it to go through.

For someone happy to vote silencer so readily, you're very trusting of him.