Spycraft 63, Trouble in Tokyo game thread, opens 18th of may.
#2201
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:11 AM
did i miss where we found out omtose is lynch proof?
#2202
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:16 AM
Eloth, on 27 May 2010 - 08:11 AM, said:
did i miss where we found out omtose is lynch proof?
We aren't certain but it looks very likely. Its in the message that D'riss intercepted whom we believe is Omtose where he states he plans to fake reveal someone as scum, kill Meanas and GL and then use his LP (Lynch Proof) to surivive the day.
#2203
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:25 AM
Eloth, on 27 May 2010 - 08:07 AM, said:
Galain, on 27 May 2010 - 07:36 AM, said:
Well our problem would be, do we have two guards out there? If we lynch Omtose and its a no go, we need a Guard on Omtose and Ruse. If we lynch Ruse we need a Guard on Omtose only.
problem is...will someone bother putting a NA on a lynch candidate!?
could be a waste!
Can people not use one provisional and then your action? say hinder/guard/vig omtose but if he is lynched, then hinder/guard/vig ruse? Obviously that would only work if the action is a night action and not one which requires preparation during the day.
#2204
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:25 AM
Galain, on 27 May 2010 - 08:16 AM, said:
Eloth, on 27 May 2010 - 08:11 AM, said:
did i miss where we found out omtose is lynch proof?
We aren't certain but it looks very likely. Its in the message that D'riss intercepted whom we believe is Omtose where he states he plans to fake reveal someone as scum, kill Meanas and GL and then use his LP (Lynch Proof) to surivive the day.
oooooooh
LP = lynch proof... didnt make the connection
#2205
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:26 AM
Actually, knowing tapper he might take a blocked lynch as a lynch so you may need to specify that the lynch works too.
#2206
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:27 AM
Well....if there is no lynch it at least confirms that driss is tellling the truth.
#2208
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:34 AM
#2209
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:36 AM
Vote Omtose
only 4 votes on him...thought it was more.
only 4 votes on him...thought it was more.
#2210
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:36 AM
No provisionals I'm pretty sure, part of the Iron Man rules - we should go check as I cant' be trusted in rules understanding

#2211
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:37 AM
Err, if we lynch omtose and he has a lynch proof it will still be a lynch. If you put a provisional in to say action omtose unless he is lynched. Well even though he didnt die because he is lynch proof he was lynched so your provisional may be used instead. I was just saying to clarifying any action to indicate a successful lynch if people put in provisionals.
#2212
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:39 AM
#2213
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:41 AM
So someone wants to kill meanes?
I believe he is the Bald guy...
GL....i havent a clue
EDIT - meanas is the bald guy
I believe he is the Bald guy...
GL....i havent a clue
EDIT - meanas is the bald guy
This post has been edited by Eloth: 27 May 2010 - 08:42 AM
#2214
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:44 AM
D, on 27 May 2010 - 08:39 AM, said:
Hmm from the rules:
Quote
1) Iron Man is in effect. That means that only 1 action per player per phase can be submitted, with no provisionals. Once submitted, the action cannot be changed, cancelled or otherwise affected by the player that submitted it. If your target is removed from the game, no matter the reason, you are STILL not allowed to submit a new action.
Not sure if he allows to say, "If so and so is lynched then target x, otherwise target y"
#2215
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:44 AM
Ok, I have a couple of hours drive ahead of me now. Keeping my vote as is.
#2216
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:45 AM
Ok...got loads of work to do....will be checking in though
#2218
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:47 AM
#2219
Posted 27 May 2010 - 08:48 AM
unless there are two funny looking bald men around....then meanas is him.
If driss tells the truth...that makes GL and meanas inno...
Changes allot dont it?
If driss tells the truth...that makes GL and meanas inno...
Changes allot dont it?