foolio, on 18 February 2010 - 06:51 PM, said:
Does anyone else find it strange/sloppy that right before fiddlers deck reading keneb and Blistig are friends and sitting in a bar talking about another fist that drinks too much with his troops and how much they dislike him and how bad of an officers behavior this is. Then by the end of the book Blistig is doing the same thing and he and Keneb hate each other? It almost seemed to me that this was just sloppy writing and a lack of keeping notes on characters.
Kind of like in HOC cutter makes the observation that Nimander and the gang clearly had never had any weapons training. And then a couple books later through a POV scene you find out Nimander and the gang had recieved extreme weapons training from Andarist...
Not trying to be overly critical, love the books, but sometimes it just seems like we are not supposed to pay any attention to previous books, which the depth of the stories and the details are, to me, one of this series biggest assets. (dont even get me started about sinn)
I'm fairly certain that Blistig was talking to someone other than Keneb about it, and was whining about how Keneb was being lax and such... Soooo, no, I didn't find it weird.
As for the Cutter thing, perception is just that, perception. Just because he THOUGHT they PROBABLY hadn't had any form of weapons training, doesn't mean he was right. This is something Erikson does to us a lot. It is meant to parallel the way we discover ancient history. Everyone has a different take on the same event, so when you're looking at what actually happened through historical accounts, it's almost too garbled to actually figure out with absolute certainty what actually happened. Personally, I enjoy that sense of uncertainty in his books, and knowing that I will never finish learning about the Malazan world, no matter how many times I read these books, I still run into things I had never seen, or considered important.