But this is my failing. Basically my imagination flagrantly disregarding Erikson's text.
A note on covers:
I'm a professional copyeditor, of sorts, and am studying editing and book publishing as a whole. One thing I learned fairly quickly was that authors and creators have ZERO say on the cover 100% of the time. You would think after selling a bazillion books, Robert Jordan could say "Hey, let's not totally ruin the cover this time," but no, he can't, and nor can Erikson interfere with what is solely considered a duty of the publisher. The cover is not part of the story, it's a tool to sell books, and since selling books is hard, you can imagine the importance of hooking casual readers with visuals. Now, I always barf when I see generic fantasy covers, so sometimes I don't understand what publishers are smoking when they choose SHEE-NA, THE DRAGON-LADY SLAYER OF THE FIFTH WIND, SWORDBREAKER or some such - with a hugely busty long-haired woman wearing steel undergarments fighting a lizard man wielding a gun and riding a werewolf. These don't appeal to me, nor any of you, I'd imagine. But that's just the way covers are. So don't worry too much about if the hounds look like wolves - just try to be better than me by imagining them as hounds and disregard the bad-ass wolf on the cover of Toll the Hounds.
I think Erikson got kinda lucky, even. Some covers are wicked awesome, especially the mostly dark (TOR?) ones. Reaper's Gale is my favourite.
But it shows the power the artist has: a generic and awful cover can make even Whiskeyjack look like some jerk on a hill.
This post has been edited by Tatterdemalion: 16 December 2009 - 12:49 AM