[Emurlahn]

Does anyone remember what serc has talked about at the top of their head?

[Korvalain]

Just pointing out that Serc hasn't been under the radar, so much as say Kaschan or Ruse or Myself, or the others that would normally come to mind when throwing out a name.

[Silanah]

Allright I am quite torn at the moment. I think the case on Ampelas has merit - it's classic post data and worth considering. Meanas was early on both trains, and I am not completely sure what that means, but IGMEOY Meanas. The Serc coincidence might not be a coincidence. I am torn.

[Alkend]

Korvalain, on 27 October 2009 - 07:03 PM, said:

Just pointing out that Serc hasn't been under the radar, so much as say Kaschan or Ruse or Myself, or the others that would normally come to mind when throwing out a name.

Kaschan is the only one out of the three who has made as little impression though, and that's why I thought of Serc. You have been quite active in jumping on trains, Ruse has definitely contributed.

[Korvalain]

IM happy testing my theory, wont be backing out of my position. Too much of a coincidence. Aloso, the amount of protestation isn't helping weaken my resolve (since now I might think that Emur was a recruit or something), so yeah, Im where I will be day end.

[Silanah]

Korvalain, on 27 October 2009 - 07:10 PM, said:

IM happy testing my theory, wont be backing out of my position. Too much of a coincidence. Aloso, the amount of protestation isn't helping weaken my resolve (since now I might think that Emur was a recruit or something), so yeah, Im where I will be day end.

How do you propose we test it.

[Mockra]

Silanah, on 27 October 2009 - 06:58 PM, said:

Meanas, on 27 October 2009 - 06:55 PM, said:

Yes, it is rather a stretch. Its a conspicuous coincidence when you see them next to each other, but it doesn't seem like a whole lot to base a case off of. I'm more interested in Mockra's reaction to it. Very suspicious, that one.

I was just thinking the same thing. I am getting tired of some players jumping on convenient votes. I mean wtf?

Go look at my posts and tell me I'm a convenient train jumper Are you thinking of meanas perhaps?

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 06:58 PM, said:

Huh, that is quite a coincidence. Nothing I can really add to that apart from that it points out Serc really has been lurking, for two people to think of him as the definition of lurker this game.

For me it's not so much that you pointed out that he is a lurker/low poster... its more the way that you each picked 1 guy out of a possible 4-5 as worth bringing up, AND the wording is decidedly similar. I don't know how you can argue that it doesn't at least LOOK like signaling. And 4 days apart would be tough to pick up by someone looking. imo its a good find by Korv.

[Korvalain]

You lynch Serc - get a full CF and detemine if he was a leader type. If so - lynch Alkend and if they are related - lynch Kess. But if Serc comes up town (doubt it) you know I am a moron.

[Alkend]

@ Korvalain Fair enough, I don't mind at all. To me Serc has been playing like a low-lying scum so lynching him is fine by me.

I have just completed my mini re-read of all the low-middle posters: my impressions are :

Kaschan: Low posting, not much content. 1 vote all game. Claims lack of time for bits, but still a poor effort to be posting so little.
Korvalain: Has been a little too train jumping happy for me.
Ruse - Weird attachment to boobs at the beginning of the game (I know, we are all attached to them). Some contribution at least
Ampelas - Nothing much controversial in my view, some content in there.
Mockra - Again, not much controversial, some content in there.
Kessobahn - Some strange posts, possibly bears more investigation.
Serc - Really not much content compared the number of posts he has - possibly low lying scum
HP - Pretty much same position as Serc, maybe slightly more contribution - possibly low lying scum

Edit, put in @ Korvalain.

This post has been edited by Alkend: 27 October 2009 - 07:18 PM

[Emurlahn]

The only way we can test it is if we lynch Serc.

Vote Serc

The amount of words in common, the tone being quite similar and from two differernt players, I'll admit Korvalain it does look like a good find.

[Silanah]

Hm, if the majority wants to lynch Serc I'm okay with it, but I think we should keep in mind the other discussions too. At least we should keep an eye on Ampelas.

[Emurlahn]

I'm surprised Alkend that you seem to suddenly realise all the other low posters in the game after Korvalain picked it up. Afraid of signing your death warrant are you if you were to vote Serc?

[Alkend]

Emurlahn, on 27 October 2009 - 07:23 PM, said:

I'm surprised Alkend that you seem to suddenly realise all the other low posters in the game after Korvalain picked it up. Afraid of signing your death warrant are you if you were to vote Serc?

If you look, the whole thing started because I said I was going to look at the low posters and put Serc as an example.
No I am not afraid of voting Serc. In fact I would be very happy if he was lynched.

[Kessobahn]

I personally picked Serc for the low-posting example for three reasons: I had forgotten Kaschan was actually playing, I've been rereading ROTCG and it comes up in there fairly early on, and it's the least effort to type. It's a total coincidence (unless Alkend picked it on purpose, of course) but I'd like to see Serc's reaction to it before I consider changing my vote.

[Korvalain]

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:17 PM, said:

Korvalain: Has been a little too train jumping happy for me.
.

I like this, seriously -

my votes as far as I recall

Day 1 - I DIDNT VOTE!
Day 2 - I voted Galain - he was lynched (scum)
Day 3 - I voted Omtose - Eloth revealed as scum ( I wasn't on to change votes)
Day 4 - I voted Omtose - he was mod killed - unaligned.
Day 4 - I voted Amp (for instantly trusting Omtose
Day 4 - noticed post by Alkend that looked familiar (went back and looked, yep, switched votes accordingly)

So how is this train hopping?

[Emurlahn]

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:27 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 27 October 2009 - 07:23 PM, said:

I'm surprised Alkend that you seem to suddenly realise all the other low posters in the game after Korvalain picked it up. Afraid of signing your death warrant are you if you were to vote Serc?

If you look, the whole thing started because I said I was going to look at the low posters and put Serc as an example.
No I am not afraid of voting Serc. In fact I would be very happy if he was lynched.

Ok you said that today fair does, but Kessobahn said that 4 days ago, and if memory serves hasn't brought up low posters ever since then or hasn't even pushed a lynch on Serc or any other low poster, if he has my memory is fail.

[Korvalain]

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:27 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 27 October 2009 - 07:23 PM, said:

I'm surprised Alkend that you seem to suddenly realise all the other low posters in the game after Korvalain picked it up. Afraid of signing your death warrant are you if you were to vote Serc?

If you look, the whole thing started because I said I was going to look at the low posters and put Serc as an example.
No I am not afraid of voting Serc. In fact I would be very happy if he was lynched.

And if you look you said nothing about low posters, instead about people who had NOT BEEN LOOKED AT YET!

Kessobahn, on 27 October 2009 - 07:30 PM, said:

I personally picked Serc for the low-posting example for three reasons: I had forgotten Kaschan was actually playing, I've been rereading ROTCG and it comes up in there fairly early on, and it's the least effort to type. It's a total coincidence (unless Alkend picked it on purpose, of course) but I'd like to see Serc's reaction to it before I consider changing my vote.

And I am pretty sure YOU posted yours 4 days ago and Serc WAS lowest poster! This is great. Inconsistencies abound! SCUM HO!

[Korvalain]

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 05:29 PM, said:

Wow a lot has happened!

Olar's reveal seems a little precipitous, and his contradiction of Omtose just bizarre in hindsight.
Ithink I am going to try and do a full reread later before considering avote, as there have been quite a few people who just haven't beenmentioned really at all, Serc for example (no reason to suggest Serc, just off the top of my head)

@ Alkend - see - you never mentioned low poster, just saying its inconsistent.

[Mockra]

Kessobahn, on 27 October 2009 - 07:30 PM, said:

I personally picked Serc for the low-posting example for three reasons: I had forgotten Kaschan was actually playing, I've been rereading ROTCG and it comes up in there fairly early on, and it's the least effort to type. It's a total coincidence (unless Alkend picked it on purpose, of course) but I'd like to see Serc's reaction to it before I consider changing my vote.

Waiting to see how your master reacts perhaps? I don't see why you would change your vote... the whole case is based upon you and Alk signaling him... if you claim you didn't signal him... there would be no reason to vote... that was an odd Post Kess.

Also, how the hell do you think he is going to react.... he is going to say, "I've been busy Haven't had time to post. I can't control what Alk and Kess said. How am I supposed to defend against something someone else said" It happens everytime someone is accused of being signaled. The only way we can test it is to vote Serc. If you don't think it's to coincidental to be signaling then you don't vote... thats the whole case.

The fact that that confuses you makes me think it might just be a coincidence... but the fact that in the same paragraph you say you want to wait for Serc, makes me think you are waiting to see what he does so you can follow his lead.

IDK at the moment this seems like the most promising thing we have going.

X-post with Korv and Emur

This post has been edited by Mockra: 27 October 2009 - 07:41 PM

[Alkend]

Considering you have only posted about 20 times, 5 votes is quite a lot in that time. Furthermore, barring your last vote there really is not much reasoning behind your 4 other votes. The first one was "because it's going to happen". First Omtose vote was because "Drunk Bent makes a lot of sense". Second Omtose vote was just insulting Omtose. Ampelas vote was the first where there wasn't already a train going on the person you voted for. The reasoning however still left much to be desired: We shouldn't rush, but I am laying down a vote for Ampelas because he rushed?! Ironic or what?!

The last vote is possibly the only that's backed up by reasoning.