[Kessobahn]

Korvalain, on 27 October 2009 - 07:34 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 27 October 2009 - 07:30 PM, said:

I personally picked Serc for the low-posting example for three reasons: I had forgotten Kaschan was actually playing, I've been rereading ROTCG and it comes up in there fairly early on, and it's the least effort to type. It's a total coincidence (unless Alkend picked it on purpose, of course) but I'd like to see Serc's reaction to it before I consider changing my vote.

And I am pretty sure YOU posted yours 4 days ago and Serc WAS lowest poster! This is great. Inconsistencies abound! SCUM HO!

So, because I named the person with the lowest posts as a low poster, I'm scum now? What does that have to do with forgetting a player?

[Alkend]

Korvalain, on 27 October 2009 - 07:37 PM, said:

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 05:29 PM, said:

Wow a lot has happened!

Olar's reveal seems a little precipitous, and his contradiction of Omtose just bizarre in hindsight.
Ithink I am going to try and do a full reread later before considering avote, as there have been quite a few people who just haven't beenmentioned really at all, Serc for example (no reason to suggest Serc, just off the top of my head)

@ Alkend - see - you never mentioned low poster, just saying its inconsistent.

Fair enough, although rather logically, the people who have been least mentioned would be the low posters wouldn't they, which is where my mention of low posters came from.

[Korvalain]

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:38 PM, said:

Considering you have only posted about 20 times, 5 votes is quite a lot in that time. Furthermore, barring your last vote there really is not much reasoning behind your 4 other votes. The first one was "because it's going to happen". First Omtose vote was because "Drunk Bent makes a lot of sense". Second Omtose vote was just insulting Omtose. Ampelas vote was the first where there wasn't already a train going on the person you voted for. The reasoning however still left much to be desired: We shouldn't rush, but I am laying down a vote for Ampelas because he rushed?! Ironic or what?!

The last vote is possibly the only that's backed up by reasoning.

First vote - because Galain was symped to death - no need to wait

Second vote (first Omtose vote) - was explained by Bent (he editted) and rehashed by me ("Omtose WAS WAY TOO DEFENSIVE)

third vote (Omtose) - was explained in detail here

Korvalain, on 27 October 2009 - 12:19 PM, said:

Imback. Im not really sure about the reveal either Omtose. Admittedly Ihavent been around as much as I would have liked, but I have beenkeeping up with the thread, reguardless of my post count. And from anoutsider looking in POV, it looks like this. Omtose gets pressured dayone (2 votes, as he clarified), and he gets really really defensive. Hepushes a scum lynch (which doesn't CI him, because other scum wantscum to die as well.), then gets more pressure day 3. Tapper has anervous breakdown and dives in front of the wooden stake that was aimedat Omtose. And Omtose continues to be a revealed (possibly fake)un-alighned player. Im pretty sure zombie isn't town, in fact, Im notsure you havent left out an ability that allows you to infect otherplayers or something (although that would mean a cult faction, and thatwas never mentioned so its doubtful.

Anyway - now you go on theoffense (and get a little emo) and say that whoever is on your lynchtrain MUST be scum. And surely some will be, however in that list ofwerewolves, vampires, and town - your win conditions arent listed, andthat makes me think either a) you arent telling the truth. or you have winning conditions other than that of town.

Eitherway you are a threat to the town, so you need to be lynched. I am goingto hold off on my vote for now, but unless someone pulls a Tapper, Iwill be putting my vote on you.

Amp vote was because Amp CIed Dk based on a Cf that didnt CI anyone

Seriously, nice job at discrediting me, but in my 20 posts I have more content and attempted help that some of the higher posters. I may not have time to spam, but I am trying to help the town. If you cant see that then you need to read more.

[Korvalain]

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:40 PM, said:

Fair enough, although rather logically, the people who have been least mentioned would be the low posters wouldn't they, which is where my mention of low posters came from.

Um - no. Until now - your name hadn't been brought up (2nd highest poster alive) nor has Silanah's (3rd highest poster) or Emur (4th) and so on.

[Emurlahn]

@ Kessobahn and Alkend if you're suggesting that it is just coincidence then surely the best way to prove it is to vote serc, surely?

[Korvalain]

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:38 PM, said:

Considering you have only posted about 20 times, 5 votes is quite a lot in that time.

One more thing - 5 votes in 4 game days isn't alot. And you said I was suspicious because I was train hopping. I am more and more confident that you are scum Alk.

[Meanas]

Okay, let me offer some thoughts here. Korvalain is scum trying to drive a lynch. Olar is scum and Korv knows it. I think Mockra is a follower of one of said scum. His symping is not quite as blatant as Beru's but that hop-on vote earlier was pretty sketchy. Lets look carefully here. Omtose is modkilled. I then place a vote on Olar because my interpretation of the evidence at hand suggested that he was a lying liar who lies, and those aren't helpful people to have around. A few other people place votes, and I think the total may have hit 4. Now, I don't know for certain, but I think we only need 8 votes to lynch at this juncture and 4 is halfway there. So, Korv happens to note a coincidental occurrence between Alkend and Kesso using the same language to point out things about Serc. Well, he uses this to distract from Olar, quite effectively I might add. Then Mockra throws down a quick vote and soon we've got a pileup starting to happen. Mockra may not be scum, he may have simply been drawn in for the ride, but it looks like Olar is a bigwig, Korv is either a partner or a subordinate and Mockra is either a symp or unwitting inno. My vote stays on Olar.

[Serc]

ok wtf, why is everyone voting me just because 2 people happened to mention me in passing, if noone remembers when kesso made his remark im pretty sure i was the lowest poster as id had hardly any time at all and think i may have had about 2 posts or something so it does make sense for him to mention me when trying to get low posters to post. About Alkend im not sure, but i have basically not been looked at yet but then again with all the omtose focus and stuff very few people have been looked at properly so i dont really know why he singled me out for that one, unless he just decided to start his read back at my posts or something.
Right now there doesnt seem to have been a lot of justification in peoples votes for me, its just a lot of OMG they both mentioned someones name lets lynch him! without much reasoning at all.

[Alkend]

Korvalain, on 27 October 2009 - 07:57 PM, said:

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:38 PM, said:

Considering you have only posted about 20 times, 5 votes is quite a lot in that time.

One more thing - 5 votes in 4 game days isn't alot. And you said I was suspicious because I was train hopping. I am more and more confident that you are scum Alk.

Sorry, I meant train jumping not train hopping.

[Alkend]

Korvalain, on 27 October 2009 - 07:54 PM, said:

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:40 PM, said:

Fair enough, although rather logically, the people who have been least mentioned would be the low posters wouldn't they, which is where my mention of low posters came from.

Um - no. Until now - your name hadn't been brought up (2nd highest poster alive) nor has Silanah's (3rd highest poster) or Emur (4th) and so on.

Say what? I am confused now. I thought you meant my post where I summarised my feelings on the low posters.

[Korvalain]

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:59 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 27 October 2009 - 07:57 PM, said:

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:38 PM, said:

Considering you have only posted about 20 times, 5 votes is quite a lot in that time.

One more thing - 5 votes in 4 game days isn't alot. And you said I was suspicious because I was train hopping. I am more and more confident that you are scum Alk.

Sorry, I meant train jumping not train hopping.

Huh?

[Emurlahn]

Has anyone thought that Serc may have been set up?

[Alkend]

Korvalain, on 27 October 2009 - 08:01 PM, said:

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:59 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 27 October 2009 - 07:57 PM, said:

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:38 PM, said:

Considering you have only posted about 20 times, 5 votes is quite a lot in that time.

One more thing - 5 votes in 4 game days isn't alot. And you said I was suspicious because I was train hopping. I am more and more confident that you are scum Alk.

Sorry, I meant train jumping not train hopping.

Huh?

You were happily jumping onto trains without much reasoning is what I mean.

[Emurlahn]

Ok, Alkend who do you suspect?

[Kessobahn]

@Emurlahn's penultimate post: Yes, looking back at Alkend's post, but it's very unlikely.

This post has been edited by Kessobahn: 27 October 2009 - 08:06 PM

[Korvalain]

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 08:01 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 27 October 2009 - 07:54 PM, said:

Alkend, on 27 October 2009 - 07:40 PM, said:

Fair enough, although rather logically, the people who have been least mentioned would be the low posters wouldn't they, which is where my mention of low posters came from.

Um - no. Until now - your name hadn't been brought up (2nd highest poster alive) nor has Silanah's (3rd highest poster) or Emur (4th) and so on.

Say what? I am confused now. I thought you meant my post where I summarised my feelings on the low posters.

Post 978

Is it seriously going to be that hard to lynch Serc?

Im sticking my neck WAY out there, if I am wrong I may be next (or Olar might, if you believe what Meanas says)

point is Serc is getting alot of help so I think he is a leader.

[Serc]

Emurlahn, on 27 October 2009 - 08:01 PM, said:

Has anyone thought that Serc may have been set up?

i have...

[Alkend]

To be perfectly honest, my number 1 suspect is Serc. Secondly Hood's path. Both have played how I expect scum to play, very much under the radar.

Third would be Olar as I am not sure about the difference between his and Omtose's claims regarding his presence at the bar I note that while Omtose was unaligned, he was proved to be telling the truth in most things.

[Emurlahn]

Remove Vote

Quite a few possibilities come to mind.

It just random coincidence.

They were signalling to Serc, bit dodgy after what happened to Beru.

Fake signalling, it could be both of them setting up a inno to die as their master, very unlikely bit risky. More likely Alkend doing a play, picks words and tone similar to Kessobahn, to make it look like they are joined at the hip.

If that the case voting for Alkend is probably a better move when we look at like this.

[Telas]

I'll be honest, Serc is a great possibility for a case if it pans out, because those posts are like 4 RL days apart and the signaling could intentionally be designed to look co-incidental. That would also make you quite the eagle eye.

I am curious how on earth you caught it if the posts are 4 days apart.