Fisher Kel-Tath
#21
Posted 23 October 2009 - 09:09 PM
fisher and toc the elder are two completely different people. all i'll say is RotCG
There's a fine line between genius and insanity. I have erased this line.
- Oscar Levant
- Oscar Levant
#22
Posted 23 October 2009 - 11:51 PM
Toc the Elder was part of the Old Guard of the Malazan Empire, and I think head of the claw. I don't remember anything about him ever being a poet.
So, you're the historian who survived the Chain of Dogs.
Actually, I didn't.
It seems you stand alone.
It was ever thus.
Actually, I didn't.
It seems you stand alone.
It was ever thus.
#24
Posted 09 December 2009 - 03:26 AM
Whoever he is, I wish he would stop writing poetry and begin writing limericks. Maybe, I wil then understand him
#25
Posted 09 December 2009 - 09:45 AM
Wampyry, on 09 December 2009 - 03:26 AM, said:
Whoever he is, I wish he would stop writing poetry and begin writing limericks. Maybe, I wil then understand him
Anomandaris 2.0 by Eispeis Kel-Tath
There once was an Andii from Kharkanas
Who proved to be a right badass
A huge burden he carried
but he never tarried
His ending, to us, seemed way too crass
Quick and dirty.
#26
Posted 09 December 2009 - 05:17 PM
Eispeis, on 09 December 2009 - 09:45 AM, said:
Wampyry, on 09 December 2009 - 03:26 AM, said:
Whoever he is, I wish he would stop writing poetry and begin writing limericks. Maybe, I wil then understand him
Anomandaris 2.0 by Eispeis Kel-Tath
There once was an Andii from Kharkanas
Who proved to be a right badass
A huge burden he carried
but he never tarried
His ending, to us, seemed way too crass
Quick and dirty.
That's better! Have Rep
This post has been edited by Wampyry: 10 December 2009 - 03:22 AM
#27
Posted 04 January 2010 - 01:38 AM
Whilst I love SE's writing, I'm not so big a fan of his poetry. Heresy?
#28
Posted 04 January 2010 - 06:30 PM
probably best place to put this, couple random points to do with Fisher, nothing really informative though =D
First things just a quote i love, when Fisher is talking with Duiker about writing an "epic" on the chain of dogs:
"In the meantime, Duiker, let us fashion an epic to crush the hearts of a thousand generations"
but the main point to my post...
The bard leaned back, retrieving his tankard. "It begins with you," he said. "And it ends with you. Your eyes to witness,
your thoughts alone. Tell me of no one's mind, presume nothing of their workings. You and I, we tell nothing, we but show"
Just thought that last sentance also speaks loud for SE and ICE writing styles and wonder if SE put that in delib!
First things just a quote i love, when Fisher is talking with Duiker about writing an "epic" on the chain of dogs:
"In the meantime, Duiker, let us fashion an epic to crush the hearts of a thousand generations"
but the main point to my post...
The bard leaned back, retrieving his tankard. "It begins with you," he said. "And it ends with you. Your eyes to witness,
your thoughts alone. Tell me of no one's mind, presume nothing of their workings. You and I, we tell nothing, we but show"
Just thought that last sentance also speaks loud for SE and ICE writing styles and wonder if SE put that in delib!
Tehol said:
'Yet my heart breaks for a naked hen.'
#29
Posted 28 January 2010 - 05:25 PM
champooon, on 04 January 2010 - 06:30 PM, said:
The bard leaned back, retrieving his tankard. "It begins with you," he said. "And it ends with you. Your eyes to witness,
your thoughts alone. Tell me of no one's mind, presume nothing of their workings. You and I, we tell nothing, we but show"
Just thought that last sentance also speaks loud for SE and ICE writing styles and wonder if SE put that in delib!
your thoughts alone. Tell me of no one's mind, presume nothing of their workings. You and I, we tell nothing, we but show"
Just thought that last sentance also speaks loud for SE and ICE writing styles and wonder if SE put that in delib!
Since when does SE not do something deliberately? Brilliant catch.
This post has been edited by Salt-Man Z: 28 January 2010 - 05:25 PM
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
#30
Posted 01 February 2010 - 04:27 AM
The poet is eternal...
"The harder the world, the fiercer the honour" - Dancer
#31
Posted 09 February 2010 - 05:29 PM
I'm going to go with Fisher being an ascendant of some sort, possibly elder. He seemed to know Envy pretty well, which leads me to believe that he's been around for a while.
I have always thought that it would be funny if he turned out to be Gothos disguised as a human because he got bored of being terrifyingly awesome...
I have always thought that it would be funny if he turned out to be Gothos disguised as a human because he got bored of being terrifyingly awesome...
#32
Posted 23 February 2010 - 06:40 PM
rhulad, on 09 February 2010 - 05:29 PM, said:
I'm going to go with Fisher being an ascendant of some sort, possibly elder. He seemed to know Envy pretty well, which leads me to believe that he's been around for a while.
I have always thought that it would be funny if he turned out to be Gothos disguised as a human because he got bored of being terrifyingly awesome...
I have always thought that it would be funny if he turned out to be Gothos disguised as a human because he got bored of being terrifyingly awesome...
Yea, it does make a lil bit of sense if Fisher turns out to be an ascendant.
However, the most uber moment is when Envy and he fall in love. Granted, Envy is a shameless flirt, but then she is probably smart enough to only fall for some really cool dude. You know, someone immortal maybe...

But then even Envy confesses to not knowing enough about Fisher...which only makes this more interesting.
#33
Posted 24 February 2010 - 06:05 PM
When Fisher attacked he Master Guild Assassin, he had some bard magic / ninja magic that paralyzed his target, and touching some nerve on his shoulder made him shat himself.
Definitely not just a poet.
I wonder what he knows about the pickled Seguleh.
Definitely not just a poet.
I wonder what he knows about the pickled Seguleh.
#34
Posted 06 March 2010 - 09:26 AM
I knwo this is a pretty dead thread and I am probably not adding anything new...
but I was just rereading the part where Fisher and Duiker start talking and came across what little Fisher does say about himself...
" 'Where are you from?' Duiker asked.
The bard drank down a mouthful and set the tankard carefully before him. 'Korel, originally. But that was a long time ago.'
'Malazan invasion?'
An odd smile as the man studied the tankard on the table before him. His hands, however, remained in his lap. 'If you mean Greymane, then yes.' "
but I was just rereading the part where Fisher and Duiker start talking and came across what little Fisher does say about himself...
" 'Where are you from?' Duiker asked.
The bard drank down a mouthful and set the tankard carefully before him. 'Korel, originally. But that was a long time ago.'
'Malazan invasion?'
An odd smile as the man studied the tankard on the table before him. His hands, however, remained in his lap. 'If you mean Greymane, then yes.' "
#35
Posted 07 March 2010 - 04:25 AM
Nice catch. May shed some light on greymane's character, if one were inclined to spend the time sifting through the books. have a rep.
#36
Posted 15 May 2010 - 08:06 PM
I always thought of him as being like the god Gilean from the Dragonlance series. He is the chronicler, the historian. It's his duty to record all important happenings.
Also reminds me of the Watcher from the Marvel Universe, in that he (might be) destined to watch and record, but he sometimes feels that it is necessary from him to interfere in events.
Also reminds me of the Watcher from the Marvel Universe, in that he (might be) destined to watch and record, but he sometimes feels that it is necessary from him to interfere in events.
This post has been edited by Whisper: 15 May 2010 - 08:17 PM
#37
Posted 04 April 2011 - 09:27 PM
Old thread but remembered what I posted above and just read this in an SE Q&A...
http://www.tor.com/b...gates-questions
Quote
Toster: Writing Felisin's character was always a matter of staying as close as possible and showing not telling, making the writing not just tight, but terse.
http://www.tor.com/b...gates-questions
Tehol said:
'Yet my heart breaks for a naked hen.'
#38
Posted 01 December 2011 - 04:09 AM
WhiskeyJackDaniels, on 23 October 2009 - 11:51 PM, said:
Toc the Elder was part of the Old Guard of the Malazan Empire, and I think head of the claw. I don't remember anything about him ever being a poet.
I'm 99% certain that Toc the Elder was not in the Claw. Also, wasn't Surly was head of the claw?
#39
Posted 14 December 2011 - 06:33 AM
I saw Erikson do a reading some years ago in Seattle, for Toll the Hounds.
One audience question concerned the nature of Kruppe. Erikson would not admit anything, except that even his own kids (who are apparently old enough to bounce ideas) do not know exactly what/who Kruppe is. I'm not sure Erikson even knows, or even wants to, which is part of the fun.
But I was left with the impression that Fisher's character has also morphed in the series, and grown with the author Erikson as a writer. Fisher started as the occasional poet who Erikson used to introduce chapters, but at some point becomes an actual character, and a badass fighter, artiste, and womanizer nonetheless. To me, he's another great character, but a work in progress, intentionally ill-defined, and an obvious self-reference to the authors themselves, maybe tongue-in-cheek.
One audience question concerned the nature of Kruppe. Erikson would not admit anything, except that even his own kids (who are apparently old enough to bounce ideas) do not know exactly what/who Kruppe is. I'm not sure Erikson even knows, or even wants to, which is part of the fun.
But I was left with the impression that Fisher's character has also morphed in the series, and grown with the author Erikson as a writer. Fisher started as the occasional poet who Erikson used to introduce chapters, but at some point becomes an actual character, and a badass fighter, artiste, and womanizer nonetheless. To me, he's another great character, but a work in progress, intentionally ill-defined, and an obvious self-reference to the authors themselves, maybe tongue-in-cheek.