Malazan Empire: The Great Pacific Garbage Patch - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch Twice the size of Texas

#1 User is offline   Aptorian 

  • How 'bout a hug?
  • Group: The Wheelchairs of War
  • Posts: 24,785
  • Joined: 22-May 06

Posted 05 August 2009 - 05:00 PM

http://en.wikipedia....c_Garbage_Patch

Quote

Great Pacific Garbage Patch
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Posted Image Posted Image
The Garbage Patch is located within the North Pacific Gyre, one of the five major oceanic gyres.

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch, also described as the Eastern Garbage Patch or the Pacific Trash Vortex, is a gyre of marine litter in the central North Pacific Ocean located roughly between 135° to 155°W and 35° to 42°N and estimated to be twice the size of Texas.[1] The patch is characterized by exceptionally high concentrations of suspended plastic and other debris that have been trapped by the currents of the North Pacific Gyre. Despite its size and density, the patch is not visible from satellite photography.
Discovery

The existence of the Eastern Garbage Patch was predicted in a 1988 paper published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the United States. The prediction was based on results obtained by several Alaska-based researchers between 1985 and 1988 that measured neustonic plastic in the North Pacific Ocean.[2] This research found high concentrations of marine debris accumulating in regions governed by particular patterns of ocean currents. Extrapolating from findings in the Sea of Japan, the researchers postulated that similar conditions would occur in other parts of the Pacific Ocean where prevailing currents were favourable to the creation of relatively stable bodies of water. They specifically indicated the North Pacific Gyre.[3]

The existence of the garbage patch received wider public and scientific attention after it was documented in several articles written by Charles Moore, a California-based sea captain and ocean researcher. Moore, returning home through the North Pacific Gyre after competing in the Transpac sailing race, came upon an enormous stretch of floating debris.

Moore alerted the oceanographer Curtis Ebbesmeyer to the existence of the phenomenon, who subsequently dubbed the region the "Eastern Garbage Patch" (EGP). The area is frequently featured in media reports as an exceptional example of marine pollution.[4]

Formation

Like other areas of concentrated marine debris in the world's oceans, the Eastern Garbage Patch has formed gradually over time as a result of marine pollution gathered by the action of oceanic currents.

The garbage patch occupies a large and relatively stationary region of the North Pacific Ocean bound by the North Pacific Gyre (a remote area commonly referred to as the horse latitudes). The rotational pattern created by the North Pacific Gyre draws in waste material from across the North Pacific Ocean, including the coastal waters off North America and Japan. As material is captured in the currents, wind-driven surface currents gradually move floating debris toward the center, trapping it in the region.

The size of the affected region is unknown, as large items readily visible from the deck of a boat are few and far between. Most of the debris consists of small plastic particles suspended at or just below the water surface, making it impossible to detect by aircraft or satellite images.[5] Estimates on size range from 700,000 km² to more than 15 million km², (0.41% to 8.1% of the size of the Pacific Ocean). The area may contain over 100 million tons of debris.[6] It has also been suggested that the patch may represent two areas of debris that are linked.[7]

Sources of pollutants

It has been estimated that 80% of the garbage comes from land-based sources, and 20% from ships at sea. Currents carry debris from the west coast of North America to the gyre in about five years, and debris from the east coast of Asia in a year or less.[8][9] An international project led by Dr. Hideshige Takada of Tokyo University studying plastic pellets from beaches around the world may provide further clues about the origins of pelagic plastic, including that of the Pacific garbage patch.[10]

Plastic photodegradation in the ocean
Main article: Photodegradation

The Eastern Garbage Patch has one of the highest levels of plastic particulate suspended in the upper water column. As a result, it is one of several oceanic regions where researchers have studied the effects and impact of plastic photodegradation in the neustonic layer of water.[11] Unlike debris which biodegrades, the photodegraded plastic disintegrates into ever smaller pieces while remaining a polymer. This process continues down to the molecular level.

As the plastic flotsam photodegrades into smaller and smaller pieces, it concentrates in the upper water column. As it disintegrates, the plastic ultimately becomes small enough to be ingested by aquatic organisms which reside near the ocean's surface. Plastic waste thus enters the food chain through its intense concentration in the neuston.

Density of neustonic plastics

Despite Charles Moore's description, the eastern garbage patch cannot be characterised as a continuous visible field of densely floating marine debris. The process of disintegration means that the plastic particulate in much of the affected region may be too small to be seen. Researchers must estimate the overall extent and density of plastic pollution in the EGP by taking samples. In a 2001 study, researchers (including Moore) found that in certain areas of the patch, concentrations of plastic reached one million particles per square mile.[12] The study found concentrations of plastics at 3.34 pieces with a mean mass of 5.1 milligrams per square meter. In many areas of the affected region, the overall concentration of plastics was greater than the concentration of zooplankton by a factor of seven. Samples collected at deeper points in the water column found much lower levels of plastic debris (primarily monofilament fishing line), confirming earlier observations that most plastic waste concentrates in the upper parts of the water column.

Impact on wildlife

The floating plastic particles resemble zooplankton, which can be inadvertently consumed by jellyfish. Many of these long-lasting plastics end up in the stomachs of marine birds and animals,[13] including sea turtles, and the Black-footed Albatross.[14] Besides the particles' danger to wildlife, the floating debris can absorb organic pollutants from seawater, including PCBs, DDT, and PAHs.[15] Aside from toxic effects,[16] when ingested, some of these are mistaken by the endocrine system as estradiol, causing hormone disruption in the affected animal.[14]

Cleanup

In 2008, Richard Owen, a building contractor and scuba dive instructor, formed the Environmental Cleanup Coalition to address the issue of the pollution of the North Pacific. The ECC plan calls for modifying a fleet of ships to clear the area of debris and form a restoration and recycling laboratory called Gyre Island.[1][17]

On 1 August 2009 it was announced that Doug Woodring (an ocean conservationist) working in conjunction with the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, would be embarking upon an expedition to the plastic vortex in order to explore, photograph, video and to alert the public to the growing threat of ocean waste. The first ship of the expedition departed California on 2 August with about 30 researchers, technicians and crew members. The 170-foot vessel New Horizon is equipped with a laboratory for on-board research, but scientists also will bring back samples for further study.

The second ship departed on 4 August. In addition to the potential harm to sea life caused by ingesting bits of plastic, the expedition team will look at whether the particles could carry other pollutants, such as pesticides, far out to sea, and whether tiny organisms attached to the debris could be transported to distant regions and thus become invasive species. Aside from conducting scientific research on the impact of the plastic vortex on marine life, the expedition will also experiment with ways to clean up the vortex without harming the marine life in and around it.[18][19]

0

#2 User is offline   MTS 

  • Fourth Investiture
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 4,334
  • Joined: 02-April 07
  • Location:Terra Australis

Posted 06 August 2009 - 05:09 AM

This is interesting and all, but what are we supposed to be discussing? The slow degradation of our world's oceans into liquefied trash dumps?
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.

Si hoc adfixum in obice legere potes, et liberaliter educatus et nimis propinquus ades.
0

#3 User is offline   stone monkey 

  • I'm the baddest man alive and I don't plan to die...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: (COPPA) Users Awaiting Moderatio
  • Posts: 2,369
  • Joined: 28-July 03
  • Location:The Rainy City

Posted 06 August 2009 - 08:03 PM

Things have a tendency to hang around for quite some time at sea, so it's not a new phenomenon by any means. For instance, old maps of the Gulf Stream show some shipwrecks that had been floating around for several years...

This post has been edited by stone monkey: 06 August 2009 - 08:22 PM

If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do. If some one maintains that two and two are five, or that Iceland is on the equator, you feel pity rather than anger, unless you know so little of arithmetic or geography that his opinion shakes your own contrary conviction. … So whenever you find yourself getting angry about a difference of opinion, be on your guard; you will probably find, on examination, that your belief is going beyond what the evidence warrants. Bertrand Russell

#4 User is offline   Aptorian 

  • How 'bout a hug?
  • Group: The Wheelchairs of War
  • Posts: 24,785
  • Joined: 22-May 06

Posted 06 August 2009 - 08:27 PM

View PostMappo's Travelling Sack, on Aug 6 2009, 07:09 AM, said:

This is interesting and all, but what are we supposed to be discussing? The slow degradation of our world's oceans into liquefied trash dumps?


Some times I just post articles because I find the stuff interesting. I hadn't heard of anything like this and I guessed that a few others may be surprised aswell.

I mean an area twice the size of texas with floating garbage. Imagine you're out sailing across the atlantic and you hit that patch. That would freak me out.
0

#5 User is offline   Raymond Luxury Yacht 

  • Throatwobbler Mangrove
  • Group: Grumpy Old Sods
  • Posts: 5,600
  • Joined: 02-July 06
  • Location:The Emerald City
  • Interests:Quiet desperation and self-loathing

Posted 07 August 2009 - 05:33 AM

I hope it eventually gets so mashed and tangled together it becomes a solid floating island of trash. It will support life that will evolve into new species found only on the trash island. Eventually it will be colonized and settled by people form crowded places.
Error: Signature not valid
0

#6 User is offline   MTS 

  • Fourth Investiture
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 4,334
  • Joined: 02-April 07
  • Location:Terra Australis

Posted 07 August 2009 - 05:51 AM

View PostAptorian, on Aug 7 2009, 06:27 AM, said:

View PostMappo's Travelling Sack, on Aug 6 2009, 07:09 AM, said:

This is interesting and all, but what are we supposed to be discussing? The slow degradation of our world's oceans into liquefied trash dumps?


Some times I just post articles because I find the stuff interesting. I hadn't heard of anything like this and I guessed that a few others may be surprised aswell.

I mean an area twice the size of texas with floating garbage. Imagine you're out sailing across the atlantic and you hit that patch. That would freak me out.

Fair enough. It's in the Discussion forum so I thought there was an issue you wanted us to debate. Credit to you though, it is an interesting article.
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.

Si hoc adfixum in obice legere potes, et liberaliter educatus et nimis propinquus ades.
0

#7 User is offline   Silencer 

  • Manipulating Special Data
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 5,683
  • Joined: 07-July 07
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Malazan Book of the Fallen series.
    Computer Game Design.
    Programming.

Posted 07 August 2009 - 05:57 AM

Well, I'm pleased they recognize the fact that most of it comes from the land. Boaties get way too much blame for marine pollution, imo. XD

On a less serious note: What are the chances it was caused deliberately by the people who predicted it?
***

Shinrei said:

<Vote Silencer> For not garnering any heat or any love for that matter. And I'm being serious here, it's like a mental block that is there, and you just keep forgetting it.

0

#8 User is offline   MTS 

  • Fourth Investiture
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 4,334
  • Joined: 02-April 07
  • Location:Terra Australis

Posted 07 August 2009 - 06:01 AM

It's obviously the Chinese creating a landbridge to attack America.
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.

Si hoc adfixum in obice legere potes, et liberaliter educatus et nimis propinquus ades.
0

#9 User is offline   Aptorian 

  • How 'bout a hug?
  • Group: The Wheelchairs of War
  • Posts: 24,785
  • Joined: 22-May 06

Posted 07 August 2009 - 07:44 AM

I think it's Lex Luthors back-up plan, after his idea for kryptonite island failed so miserably in "Superman lifts stuff".
0

#10 User is offline   Terez 

  • High Analyst of TQB
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 4,981
  • Joined: 17-January 07
  • Location:United States of North America
  • Interests:WWQBD?
  • WoT Fangirl, Rank Traitor

Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:48 AM

This is old news. I imagine getting rid of it might do something for rising sea levels, though....good thing most of it is in once place - that should make it easier to collect. :ermm:

The President (2012) said:

Please proceed, Governor.

Chris Christie (2016) said:

There it is.

Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:

And no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.
0

#11 User is offline   stone monkey 

  • I'm the baddest man alive and I don't plan to die...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: (COPPA) Users Awaiting Moderatio
  • Posts: 2,369
  • Joined: 28-July 03
  • Location:The Rainy City

Posted 10 August 2009 - 09:52 PM

At which point, where do you put it? Landfills?

This post has been edited by stone monkey: 10 August 2009 - 09:53 PM

If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do. If some one maintains that two and two are five, or that Iceland is on the equator, you feel pity rather than anger, unless you know so little of arithmetic or geography that his opinion shakes your own contrary conviction. … So whenever you find yourself getting angry about a difference of opinion, be on your guard; you will probably find, on examination, that your belief is going beyond what the evidence warrants. Bertrand Russell

#12 User is offline   Sindriss 

  • Walker of Edges
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 897
  • Joined: 25-May 07
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 10 August 2009 - 09:56 PM

Don't know about you guys, but it is news like this that makes me sad. :'(

Quote

I would like to know if Steve have ever tasted anything like the quorl white milk, that knocked the bb's out.

A: Nope, but I gots me a good imagination.
0

#13 User is offline   Sir Thursday 

  • House Knight
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,819
  • Joined: 14-July 05
  • Location:Enfield, UK

Posted 10 August 2009 - 10:59 PM

I knew about the Atlantic version of this - known as the Sargasso Sea, I believe...


Sir Thursday
Don't look now, but I think there's something weird attached to the bottom of my posts.
0

#14 User is offline   Terez 

  • High Analyst of TQB
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 4,981
  • Joined: 17-January 07
  • Location:United States of North America
  • Interests:WWQBD?
  • WoT Fangirl, Rank Traitor

Posted 11 August 2009 - 03:45 AM

View Poststone monkey, on Aug 10 2009, 04:52 PM, said:

At which point, where do you put it? Landfills?

Well, if it's mostly plastic, I don't suppose there's much else we could do with it. Put it in space! Then we can see if it all collects out there somewhere...

The President (2012) said:

Please proceed, Governor.

Chris Christie (2016) said:

There it is.

Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:

And no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.
0

#15 User is offline   Sinisdar Toste 

  • Dead Serious
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 3,851
  • Joined: 14-July 07
  • Location:The C-Hood

Posted 11 August 2009 - 03:58 AM

im glad that there's actually some talk of removing it finally. as to where it could all go, i too was thinking of space, or maybe in the chicago post office. i hear its up for grabs
There's a fine line between genius and insanity. I have erased this line.

- Oscar Levant
0

#16 User is offline   Urb 

  • Emperor
  • View gallery
  • Group: Malazan Artist
  • Posts: 796
  • Joined: 16-April 07

Posted 11 August 2009 - 04:11 AM

Sending it out into space would be extremely expensive. We need one of those corpse eating trucks which uses corpses for fuel. Only it's a garbage eating boat, using garbage for fuel. Then it can pump all the toxic gasses into our atmosphere where we can't see it, meaning the problem wont exist anymore.
The leader, his audience still,
considered their scholarly will.
He lowered his head
and with anguish he said,
"But how will we teach them to kill?"


-some poet on reddit
0

#17 User is offline   Tapper 

  • Lover of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 6,683
  • Joined: 29-June 04
  • Location:Delft, Holland.

Posted 11 August 2009 - 02:53 PM

View Poststone monkey, on Aug 10 2009, 11:52 PM, said:

At which point, where do you put it? Landfills?

Texas.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
0

#18 User is offline   Aptorian 

  • How 'bout a hug?
  • Group: The Wheelchairs of War
  • Posts: 24,785
  • Joined: 22-May 06

Posted 11 August 2009 - 03:06 PM

But you would need two texas's...
0

#19 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,619
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 11 August 2009 - 05:02 PM

View PostAptorian, on Aug 11 2009, 11:06 AM, said:

But you would need two texas's...


Or so they guess. And that's including space between things. And not depth. You could probably stack it all in the size of a small county if you could get it several stories tall...

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#20 User is offline   Agraba 

  • Emperor
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 732
  • Joined: 09-November 05

Posted 11 August 2009 - 08:05 PM

What I got from this article is that the plastic is almost entirely dissolved into microscopic bits so I'm not so sure a simple "trash collecting" would suffice. They'd have to actually siphon water. Unless I'm reading this wrong.
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users