caladanbrood, on Jun 5 2009, 02:01 PM, said:
Tapper, what about Geert Wilders? He has a rather infamous reputation here, but is the only dutch politician we ever hear anything about...
Wilders is the lower middle class' mouthpiece, and if I go by my own prejudices, he's the kind of mouthpiece that has spittle flying around.
I'm sure you've heard of his adagium: 'muslims are ok but their religion is an intolerant, hateful, dangerous indoctrination and the Quran is Mohammed's Mein Kampf.' he's also eurosceptistical (the slogan for the European Elections was: 'a smaller Europe') and is vehemently against Turkey joining the Union.
Another of his oft-expressed views: 'the Netherlands are a christian/jewish society known for its tolerance and equality, so if you come here, you adapt to that' (never mind that historically, we weren't all that tolerant for long, long times, and certainly not of Jews (unless they were rich));
Basically, he's a child of 9/11.
Many of his other program points are in conflict:
- less taxes, but higher defense budgets and more money to the police;
- absolute freedom of speech, but far more intrusion into the private life of citizens through cameras and expansion of the police rights;
- freedom of religion but a stop on building mosques;
- more asphalt and less emphasis on eco-energy and nature preservation but heightened protection of animals.
Moreover, he isn't head of a political party. He has no party, even though he has called his movement 'The Party for Freedom' as if we have none yet

.
Instead, he leads a movement - the subtle difference being of course that he has no organization and thus, no rules for it, can make the program all by himself, has no members to be held accountable by, etcetera. Not very democratic.
On the plus side, he has gotten the debate started, and everyone has been forced to admit that something is wrong in our society, or at the least, that things can be better. Moreover, contrary to what many think, he isn't a one-issue politician (although he really leans on islam-fear of his followers), nor is he a real demagogue - instead, he works very hard, keeps his followers under control, manages to slip away from pressure politically time and time again and is maneuvering smartly. It's hard not to respect him on some level, and all things considered, when you compare his views to those held in the US, he would fit into the middle of the Conservative Party, so calling him extreme right wing isn't exactly true - he just fits to the right of our political constellation.
This post has been edited by Tapper: 05 June 2009 - 01:10 PM
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad