[Meanas]

Why did you say FM?

[Hood's Path]

I think I cracked it boys, I did some Forensic analysis on the entire thread and it hit me all of a sudden. I'm operating on a Dr. House M.D. mixed with Shawn Spense from Psych type of level right now. SEE BELOW:



I took a closer look at this picture and I'm convinced I found the killer! Please note;

1. Donkeys don't wear clothes! I already picked up on this earlier without even realizing it I'm that scary good. If donkey's don't wear clothes then this must be a clever ruse to deceive us. Only scum are deceiving ergo, the donkey is the killer. But wait...there's more

2. Notice the crazy bloodshot cross-eyed donkey eyes. Oh yeah killer for sure. I used a photomax 300 with optical zoom capabilities of 40x to bring you this amazing evidence. Certified by top government scientists as well.

3. Almost the clincher, notice the obvious zipper line just around the neck. It's more clearer than the guy on the grassy knoll. This isn't a donkey! It's a human in a donkey suit with human clothes, can the web of lies go any deeper?

4. Empty booze bottles, that's right, this donkuman has been drinking and we all know scum slip in mafia when drunk.

There you have it folks, clear cut and done. Game over.

[D'riss]

Hood's Path, on May 13 2009, 12:09 PM, said:

I think I cracked it boys, I did some Forensic analysis on the entire thread and it hit me all of a sudden. I'm operating on a Dr. House M.D. mixed with Shawn Spense from Psych type of level right now. SEE BELOW:

scum_donkey.jpg

I took a closer look at this picture and I'm convinced I found the killer! Please note;

1. Donkeys don't wear clothes! I already picked up on this earlier without even realizing it I'm that scary good. If donkey's don't wear clothes then this must be a clever ruse to deceive us. Only scum are deceiving ergo, the donkey is the killer. But wait...there's more

2. Notice the crazy bloodshot cross-eyed donkey eyes. Oh yeah killer for sure. I used a photomax 300 with optical zoom capabilities of 40x to bring you this amazing evidence. Certified by top government scientists as well.

3. Almost the clincher, notice the obvious zipper line just around the neck. It's more clearer than the guy on the grassy knoll. This isn't a donkey! It's a human in a donkey suit with human clothes, can the web of lies go any deeper?

4. Empty booze bottles, that's right, this donkuman has been drinking and we all know scum slip in mafia when drunk.

There you have it folks, clear cut and done. Game over.

THIS CASE IS BOTH EPIC AND LIKELY TRUE.

Remove Vote
VOTE DONKUMAN

[Tennes]

Korlat, on May 13 2009, 09:05 PM, said:

Tennes, on May 13 2009, 11:56 AM, said:

Korlat, on May 13 2009, 07:14 PM, said:

Remove Vote

Since it was a bit too hit-and-run, and not entirely thought-out.

Oh, and my phrase that "I don't buy that Emurlahn was silenced" was to point out that I don't entirely buy that he was silenced by an outside party. I guess I can see how people didn't catch the nuance there. But talk about an over-analysis of syntax ...

I'm back. Since I brought this up, I should reply - I got from the beginning that you thought Emur might be a scum who was silenced in a WIFOM move. I voted for you for bringing that up, since at this point discussing it only muddies the waters and drags us around in circles. Exactly the kind of behaviour the scum are looking for at this point. Yes I know emur being silenced doesnt mean he is scum, but only being able to post in pictures isnt something he can defend himself from and going after him straight off the bat seems scummy to me.

Well, I agree, and removed my vote accordingly.

The possibility has to be considered, though. I suppose it just won't matter if we lynch him, he'll simply come up Inno, since at worst he's a Symp.

And I'm not voting for Rashan because I simply don't believe in the whole "Killers in plain, attention-getting sight." I've never seen it - that is, a Killer being a massive spammer right off the bat. It's too likely they'd get voted off simply out of annoyance, and I don't see even an FM taking that gamble.

Seems reasonable

remove vote

And technically he's not an FM

[Korlat]

Meanas, on May 13 2009, 12:08 PM, said:

Why did you say FM?

I thought that was the correct term for a Killer who could shift after dying.

The use of "FM" kind of predates my Mafia playing, so I could be using it incorrectly.

[D'riss]

Korlat, on May 13 2009, 12:17 PM, said:

Meanas, on May 13 2009, 12:08 PM, said:

Why did you say FM?

I thought that was the correct term for a Killer who could shift after dying.

The use of "FM" kind of predates my Mafia playing, so I could be using it incorrectly.

HE JUST PLAYED... THE NOOB CARD


Remove Vote.
Vote Korlat.

[Tennes]

Korlat, on May 13 2009, 09:17 PM, said:

Meanas, on May 13 2009, 12:08 PM, said:

Why did you say FM?

I thought that was the correct term for a Killer who could shift after dying.

The use of "FM" kind of predates my Mafia playing, so I could be using it incorrectly.

FMs shift alts, taking over the account of the person they killed. Like Gem and JA in the vampire game. In this case the original player dies and elects a new player to be killer. No switching of accounts.

Edit - and you mine fish with sticks of dynamite, duh...

This post has been edited by Tennes: 13 May 2009 - 07:23 PM

[Meanas]

Slow game is slow.

I would be willing to take out Rashan based on the WIFOM that noone ever kills the highest poster on day 1. JA monkey syndrome.

I would be willing to take out Silanah based on how he seems to be symping as many people as possible.

Anyone else have any kind of anything like cases against anyone?

[Telas]

Rashan, for spamming. I mean, seriously, now he is completely contradicting what he earlier said(that people don't hide behind spam, etc) with his HP case(that HP is hiding behind spam, and this was his plan from the start). Can't say I buy it tbh. He has also continued spamming, even after his case says that it helps scum etc.

I believe I voted Rashan, though I think the mods missed me in the counts.

Just to re-iterate then:

remove vote
Vote Rashan

[Silanah]

Id be willing to lynch meanas for wanting to lynch anybody, no matter how shit the case is! I mean what the fuck? When did i symp you, meanas? And who the fuck else did i symp? You say i am symping everyone? really? The only thing i have done is agree certain points are valid. And dissagree on other points. There is something Fucking fishy going on here.

[Telas]

Korlat, on May 13 2009, 03:05 PM, said:

Tennes, on May 13 2009, 11:56 AM, said:

Korlat, on May 13 2009, 07:14 PM, said:

Remove Vote

Since it was a bit too hit-and-run, and not entirely thought-out.

Oh, and my phrase that "I don't buy that Emurlahn was silenced" was to point out that I don't entirely buy that he was silenced by an outside party. I guess I can see how people didn't catch the nuance there. But talk about an over-analysis of syntax ...

I'm back. Since I brought this up, I should reply - I got from the beginning that you thought Emur might be a scum who was silenced in a WIFOM move. I voted for you for bringing that up, since at this point discussing it only muddies the waters and drags us around in circles. Exactly the kind of behaviour the scum are looking for at this point. Yes I know emur being silenced doesnt mean he is scum, but only being able to post in pictures isnt something he can defend himself from and going after him straight off the bat seems scummy to me.

Well, I agree, and removed my vote accordingly.

The possibility has to be considered, though. I suppose it just won't matter if we lynch him, he'll simply come up Inno, since at worst he's a Symp.

And I'm not voting for Rashan because I simply don't believe in the whole "Killers in plain, attention-getting sight." I've never seen it - that is, a Killer being a massive spammer right off the bat. It's too likely they'd get voted off simply out of annoyance, and I don't see even an FM taking that gamble.

Actually, we very rarely vote spammers off I find.

I can hardly ever remember spammers being voted for just spam, and i've certainly seen scum who spam.

[Meanas]

Well look at that mafia rage off simply bringing up a case Fener brought up pages ago.

That is interesting.

[Telas]

D'riss, on May 13 2009, 03:19 PM, said:

Korlat, on May 13 2009, 12:17 PM, said:

Meanas, on May 13 2009, 12:08 PM, said:

Why did you say FM?

I thought that was the correct term for a Killer who could shift after dying.

The use of "FM" kind of predates my Mafia playing, so I could be using it incorrectly.

HE JUST PLAYED... THE NOOB CARD


Remove Vote.
Vote Korlat.

Frankly that is a rather bad excuse to throw on a vote(possibly to de-rail from Rashan, Korlat looking like most likely alternative).

You have bolded "the use of FM predates my mafia playing".

FM is a general scum term, and has been used at westeros before mafia started up here.

The term itself will predate everyone, or at least almost everyones playing.

I really don't see that as playing the noob card, it is simply explaining a mis-understanding, and not even a very unlikely one at that.

I feel you're just using anything to hop on a train.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 1. 5 hours and 34 minutes remaining

15 Players still alive: D'riss, Emurlahn, Fener, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Kessobahn, Korlat, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Rashan, Ruse, Silanah, Telas, Tennes

8 votes to lynch, 8 votes to go to night

1 vote for Hood's Path: ( Rashan )
4 votes for Korlat: ( Emurlahn, Korvalain, Gamelon, D'riss )
2 votes for Silanah: ( Fener, Hood's Path )
4 votes for Rashan: ( Meanas, Silanah, Liosan, Telas )

Players not voted: Kessobahn, Korlat, Ruse, Tennes

Hope that's right now?

I won't be around much longer. But I hope Sir T will be on later.

- bwgan

[Silanah]

In fact remove vote vote meanas you are FAR too willing to lynch anybody for any reason. You seem in capable of coming up with your own opinions and look like you will take any lynch without putting much thought into it.

[Fener]

Silanah, on May 13 2009, 04:07 PM, said:

In fact remove vote vote meanas you are FAR too willing to lynch anybody for any reason. You seem in capable of coming up with your own opinions and look like you will take any lynch without putting much thought into it.

First, that vote is supposed to be on a seperate line

also

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH! Sorry, I thought it was funny. You know, the underlined part.

Carry on.

[Telas]

silanah, we have an hour and twenty minutes left.
I really doubt we'll get a lynch on someone who has no votes at present, so that really is a no-vote.

Edit: Scrap that, thought the time update said 1.5 hours left. reading fail.

This post has been edited by Telas: 13 May 2009 - 08:11 PM

[Fener]

Oh and Silanah. Your not logged in as invisible.

[Korlat]

D'riss, on May 13 2009, 12:19 PM, said:

Korlat, on May 13 2009, 12:17 PM, said:

Meanas, on May 13 2009, 12:08 PM, said:

Why did you say FM?

I thought that was the correct term for a Killer who could shift after dying.

The use of "FM" kind of predates my Mafia playing, so I could be using it incorrectly.

Remove Vote.
Vote Korlat.

Bullshit. I've been playing for almost two years - the term in question simply hasn't been tossed around much in that time. I get the impression it was used a lot more previously.

[Meanas]

Silanah, on May 13 2009, 03:07 PM, said:

In fact remove vote vote meanas you are FAR too willing to lynch anybody for any reason. You seem in capable of coming up with your own opinions and look like you will take any lynch without putting much thought into it.

Oh look, angry OMGUS!

It tastes delicious this morning.

Is this really all you have? Freaking out over me not even voting for you?