Gamelon, on May 10 2009, 09:21 AM, said:
Ampelas, on May 10 2009, 05:14 PM, said:
galain revealed as rezzik and he claims tennes was his partner who was inigo.
emur revealed as inigio
i revealed as fezzik.
rashan revealed as partnered to tennes as king and queen (lovers)
Gailain came up as town, therefore either galain is a symp or the entire evil team decided to reveal for the sole purpose of removing ja.
It doesnt take a genius to realise that ja was lying and that we now have 4 PI (me, you, emur, rashan)
there are ten players left, hp cannot be the last killer as he has missed too many days and so wasnt here to put in actions. in fact the only people whop could be the last killer and have chosen ano are
omtose
korvalain
me
you
rashan
emur
4 of the pi's!!!
so its either omtose or korvalain. korvalain i feel is a symp, so my bet is on omtose.
remove vote
vote omtose
I'm just looking this over and over and I can't help but think it's full of wine.
If you and Emur are scum (and Fener was a partner?) and Rashan and Tennes were your symps, you have 3 people right now and a bad lynch tonight puts the game one night from your victory (1 lynch + 1 kill, assuming this scenario Emur has no vig I'd guess). So... the counter argument is naturally, "Then after inno/inno CFs, you proceed to lynch all 3 of us in short order, and win the game, so clearly we aren't the scum because if we mess up this mass reveal, we lose."
Completely valid counter-argument, and assuming it did happen this way, I'm at a loss to think how you could talk your way out of it, yet here you are talking your way out of the original plan.
Now the inverse, let's say you are legit and Galain was a symp. Why did you blow your wad on his lynch in return for your own? Why would Rashan randomly reveal (saying that he figured he would since everyone else was doing it, aka peer pressure lol)? He even admits it makes him look bad, which is mostly stating the obvious. Best I can figure is, you were so damned confident that Galain would CF inno you went all in on the bet. Problem is, flop came up 5 9 A and you're holding K K, so now you look just weird for pushing a case on someone who we can't actually determine if he was lying.
It's circular. If I assume you're innocent, the logical counter-argument is that you could easily not be and be hoping to press a lynch tomorrow anyway with your persuasive powers, or possibly sacrificing one of your scum partners to try and clear the others (maybe Rashan?). All I come up with is I really DON'T know if you are telling the truth and it's again your word against Galain's (post-mortem).
But, I think Ampelas's word may be the strongest here for being CI, which is why I still haven't voted.
Also, sorry for the poker reference.