[Korvalain]

Korlat, on May 4 2009, 06:09 PM, said:

Korvalain, on May 5 2009, 10:02 AM, said:

Silanah, on May 4 2009, 10:00 AM, said:

D'riss, on May 4 2009, 02:59 PM, said:

Ruse, on May 4 2009, 09:51 AM, said:

Hello everyone. And what cave do you live in D'riss to have not seen the movie?

I saw the beginning in grade school or something, but I damn well don't remember the details.

Tsk tsk.... Watch it online. I'm going to watch it again tonight with the partner, just to refresh my memory... Make some commitment to your Mafia games!

Just something odd I saw. But worth a vote early day one.

I was on when he posted that. I thought that it was a reference to his RL. Doesn't really seem all that unusual to me. Wouldn't hurt to keep a watch on what else he says. If we have paired killers then it might have been a signal from a symp. That is really the best that it could be right now. As Meanas says partners would know who each other are even if they can't talk off thread.

Like I said. Its not a major thing. But needed to be pointed out, and I see nothing thus far to vote for other than that. For now, anyway.

[D'riss]

Fener, on May 4 2009, 03:11 PM, said:

When did Mafia become Dead Poet's Society?

Assume the position!

[Korvalain]

Sigh. Gonna be a long lonely day it seems. I'll check back later.

[Anomandaris]

Quick look before I go to bed. Not sold on the Silanah thing, but hopefully things will make more sense after a good night's sleep.

[D'riss]

Now that I've gotten some food...tbh the case with silanah is far from substantial. Now, my continued hunger (typing as I eat) is probably impairing my judgment, but I'm inclined to leave that as only a last-resort option. Besides that, I imagine that at least half our paired guys are inno, so it's not necessarily best to charge straight in and attack someone on suspicion they're paired.

[Korvalain]

D'riss, on May 4 2009, 06:37 PM, said:

Now that I've gotten some food...tbh the case with silanah is far from substantial. Now, my continued hunger (typing as I eat) is probably impairing my judgment, but I'm inclined to leave that as only a last-resort option. Besides that, I imagine that at least half our paired guys are inno, so it's not necessarily best to charge straight in and attack someone on suspicion they're paired.

This isn't scummy at all. Coming in and saying my vote is a "case". And then saying that my reasoning is flawed because I mention the remark, thereby discrediting me, and any future reference I make. Kind pisses me off actually. Taking a single vote on a person and turning it into a solid case. Then saying that said case is rubbish.

Remove Vote Vote D'riss

Edit: to bold

This post has been edited by Korvalain: 04 May 2009 - 10:53 PM

[Korvalain]

Also D'riss, If you are still around, how is one vote on someone "attacking"?

[Shadow]

D'riss, on May 4 2009, 03:37 PM, said:

I imagine that at least half our paired guys are inno, so it's not necessarily best to charge straight in and attack someone on suspicion they're paired.

Why would you even feel the need to speculate about Inno mechanics?

[Kessobahn]

Seriously, what are you, Yellow?

why would you go and say that you've found a possible pair on day 1....

[D'riss]

Shadow, on May 4 2009, 06:58 PM, said:

D'riss, on May 4 2009, 03:37 PM, said:

I imagine that at least half our paired guys are inno, so it's not necessarily best to charge straight in and attack someone on suspicion they're paired.

Why would you even feel the need to speculate about Inno mechanics?

Because if he's right but has found inno then he could be telling all the scum who our healers/finders/guards or whatever are.

edit: brainfart + grammar

This post has been edited by D'riss: 05 May 2009 - 12:31 AM

[Ruse]

Back now for a bit. I was here during the conversation when the Silanah partner thing came up. At the time it came off quite naturally as a RL reference, so I'm not sure that it's something to go off on. If Silanah was paired scum, I doubt even a noob would do something so obvious as to mention their in-game partnership. However, Silanah visibly lurking suggests they possibly are a newbie and more prone to make some sort of gross error.

D'riss overextends his thought process IMO. Also, speculating on inno mechanics can come across as fishing for information.

[Ruse]

In unrelated news, I like how my tab at the bottem of the screen for this window says "Mafia 45 - The Prince" which makes me think of Machiavelli rather than The Princess Bride.

Seems appropriate somehow.

Edited to add: I just noticed I'm all alone. :sniffles:

This post has been edited by Ruse: 05 May 2009 - 12:57 AM

[Korvalain]

Kessobahn, on May 4 2009, 08:10 PM, said:

Seriously, what are you, Yellow?

why would you go and say that you've found a possible pair on day 1....

What fucking inno pair codes by saying partner? At best its a symp. At worst its nothing. Why such drama over pointing out the fact that someone said partner? Why do you feel the killers are stupid and me "pointing out" a partner "code" revealed that info to them? Geez. I thought I was the dumb one. Now I see that I must be a freaking GENIUS! Figuring out that code! HA!

[Ruse]

Nice, now I fine myself speculating that Kesso and Silanah are paired.

[Korvalain]

Ruse, on May 4 2009, 09:09 PM, said:

Nice, now I fine myself speculating that Kesso and Silanah are paired.

(Sarcasm) Why would you do that?!!! Why would you speculate on inno pairs? OUT LOUD??? (/Sarcasm)

Gotta say though, lots of info bubbling to the surface with one vote. Here's hoping that the rest of the game (and everyone playing) continues to progress in a like manner. As opposed to scum sliding by un-noticed.

[Telas]

You mean you want me to rhyme again?
For holding it in gives me much pain.

I have to go sleep now. By which I mean fap and play DS for another, oh, 6 hours before finally drifting off in the wee hours of the morning. It keeps mom happy, at least.

[Shadow]

D'riss, on May 4 2009, 05:31 PM, said:

Shadow, on May 4 2009, 06:58 PM, said:

D'riss, on May 4 2009, 03:37 PM, said:

I imagine that at least half our paired guys are inno, so it's not necessarily best to charge straight in and attack someone on suspicion they're paired.

Why would you even feel the need to speculate about Inno mechanics?

Because if he's right but has found inno then he could be telling all the scum who our healers/finders/guards or whatever are.

Well, yeah - I was asking a rhetorical question.

He's either a complete noob, or a ham-handed Symp.

[D'riss]

Shadow, on May 4 2009, 09:37 PM, said:

D'riss, on May 4 2009, 05:31 PM, said:

Shadow, on May 4 2009, 06:58 PM, said:

D'riss, on May 4 2009, 03:37 PM, said:

I imagine that at least half our paired guys are inno, so it's not necessarily best to charge straight in and attack someone on suspicion they're paired.

Why would you even feel the need to speculate about Inno mechanics?

Because if he's right but has found inno then he could be telling all the scum who our healers/finders/guards or whatever are.

Well, yeah - I was asking a rhetorical question.

He's either a complete noob, or a ham-handed Symp.

Did you respond to my post by referring to myself in 3rd person (as opposed to 2nd)?

Now who's the noob?



Off to bed for me. G'night.

[Ruse]

@ D'riss, I think he was referring to Silanah. And that was a weak attempt at attention deflection IMO.

vote D'riss

[Shadow]

D'riss, on May 4 2009, 06:42 PM, said:

Shadow, on May 4 2009, 09:37 PM, said:

Well, yeah - I was asking a rhetorical question.

He's either a complete noob, or a ham-handed Symp.

Did you respond to my post by referring to myself in 3rd person (as opposed to 2nd)?

Huh - I thought I was responding to someone else. My original question was about you.

Yeah, you're the one I was talking about - talking in-thread about your estimation of Inno distribution.