[Ruse]

Can someone double check me, I don't think Rashan has posted at all. I went through the quick counter, just want to make sure I'm seeing it right.

[Serc]

Part 2:

Now this bit confuses me. There's only one post by Ruse in between, but it's big som I wont include it.

Telas, on Apr 25 2009, 04:00 AM, said:

Ok, I see you Meanas. Scum radar? Sounds like something only a scum would come equipped with.

Vote Meanas

Telas puts down an OMGUS vote.

*Ruse's Post, said about Amp - the proper thing is giant and nested, here's what he wrote*

Quote

I went back and looked at the current votes and this one seems really strange to me. He went from goofy to serious business in one post and based it on someone using the words I spy and hate for an alt name? Seems suspicious to me.

Meanas, on Apr 25 2009, 04:01 AM, said:

rofl.gif



Edit: cross post! Yeah, Ampelas is a scummy bastard, lets hang him high

Bit of a joke post

Telas, on Apr 25 2009, 04:05 AM, said:

Meh, you're right.

remove vote

Tellan and Mokra are visible....

Then Telas removes his vote again straight away. The only thing he could be agreeing with is the comment about Amp, dont see what it has to do with his vote on Meanas.

Meanas, on Apr 25 2009, 04:07 AM, said:

remove vote

Congrats you passed the test.

vote Fener

Still the best bet for a lynch imo. Who even tries to make an intelligible case that early on day 1? Someone trying to fit in, that's who.

Then Meanas puts his vote back on Fener. Who is the 'best bet for a lynch' despite the fact that 4 or 5 people have said the dont think they would vote for him for being aggressive. And I dont follow his logic here either, Fener is probably the player standing out the most at this point, it would have been much easier for him to fit in by just spamming away with everyone else.

Meanas, on Apr 25 2009, 04:10 AM, said:

Well I'm off. Please don't drink all of the bar.

And then he says goodbye.

Ok, that's everything. Lot's of one-line posts, joking around and an obsession with Fener. Dunno if any of that makes him scum, but I certainly dont agree with his point of view and that little exchange with Telas was wierd. Egh, Nothing convincing, but I'd be willing to put a vote here if things enter crunchtime.

[Galain]

Emurlahn, on Apr 24 2009, 10:02 PM, said:

Mockra, on Apr 24 2009, 08:14 PM, said:

There isn't one to be had until you randomly decided my bad role-playing was a reason to vote for me.

So are you implying Fener's was a legitimate case here?

Well, yes, that would be a logical conclusion.

Emurlahn, on Apr 24 2009, 08:21 PM, said:

Tennes, on Apr 24 2009, 08:20 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on Apr 24 2009, 02:12 PM, said:

remove vote

tbh I'm not finding drunk RP very entertaining...wake me when we start playing fer cereal.

don't ust complian abut not playing for rel. iffs uss want to git serious oh right give a head

Eh, I'm just lacking the motivation to really contribute atm. So I'll wait for a bit before really paying a lot of attention.

Aha. This is the one that I thought was just weak.

Oh, and aside from this? 5 other posts. All spam.

[Galain]

@Ruse, yes, no posts from Rashan.

[Tellan]

well, we've got a rich palette to chose from it'd seem.

of the new cases people are making, i'm starting to like Galain's analysis of Emu.

[Serc]

Ruse, on Apr 25 2009, 10:58 AM, said:

I kinda got the impression Fener was going to push real hard then coast the weekend, not sure why, just seemed too aggressive. Guess we can see on that one. Anyone not checked in yet? I could put a vote on someone not here easily.

That's a bit bastard, at least let someone check in before you try start a train on them.

[Telas]

To explain that bit:

I didn't think Meanas was being serious when I voted. Then I saw the rofl emoticon after I voted for him and concluded "yeah, he's not being serious".

That's why I removed the vote.

His "ok, you passed the test" was a bit contrived though.

[Telas]

Cross post

My post above was in response to Serc's post

Quote

Then Telas removes his vote again straight away. The only thing he could be agreeing with is the comment about Amp, dont see what it has to do with his vote on Meanas.

It had nothing to do with Amp.

[Serc]

Telas, on Apr 25 2009, 11:24 AM, said:

Cross post

My post above was in response to Serc's post

Quote

Then Telas removes his vote again straight away. The only thing he could be agreeing with is the comment about Amp, dont see what it has to do with his vote on Meanas.

It had nothing to do with Amp.

Ok. Dont really understand how the sentence "Meh you're right" can be given in reply to a ROFL emote, but w/e, it's not really enough to garner a vote at this point.

[Anomandaris]

Tellan, on Apr 25 2009, 01:06 AM, said:

Elementary, my dear Fener.
it's all about the context.

me saying you are innos should not carry any weight whatsoever with the rest of the players--I EXPECT it not to.
As such me stating that amounts to nothing other than me saying "I don't want to vote for those two right now, because I am yet to see a reason to change my joke vote onto either of them"

There's absolutely no reason to read anything deeper into my post on day 1. I am not accusing/defending anyone--I see no reason to at this point. We're past the rp/spam portion of day one, and now we're into random finge-pointing. I see no one worth of a reprimand and a vote from me as of yet.

i found this post to be relatively scummy. on a few occassions you admit to purposefully coasting and trying to ensure you dont rock the boat. You post an awful lot of spam or non relevant posts and state quite clearly your stance of nuetrality. I do not see why an inno would feel the need to express this stance so much. Plenty of players arent being aggressive, but youyr the only one who goes out there and says it.

Tellan, on Apr 25 2009, 01:36 AM, said:

might be a good idea
remove vote

time for joke votes has come and gone.

EDIT: @ Shadow, obviously

Tellan, on Apr 25 2009, 01:39 AM, said:

also, vote Ruse

we're getting serious, so let's have some contribution, plz!

Tellan, on Apr 25 2009, 02:23 AM, said:

also

remove vote

vote Omtose


yes, i'm going down the list of low-posting spammers, to get them to contribute,

I thought it was time to stop the joke votes, yet now you have taken it upon yourself to harrass low posters at two in the morning.

vote tellan

You are trying to hard to be innocent, posting a lot but making a point of ensuring that everyone realises you arent a threat to them. You seem to have plenty of opinions about the major confrontations that have taken place but your voting is always somewhere safe and when confronted you move onto another easy target, pretending that you are doing some sort of public service by hiding behind a low poster hunt.

[Tellan]

yeah, you forgot that I have since then moved on to Tennes,

As for my opinion--I was asked to give one. I did.
everyone's free to draw their own conclusoins.

Edit; considering it was Friday night and i was stuck in front of a laptop, a textbook, and a bunch of paper since 7 PM with no end in sight, yes, I decided to harass the low posters. Quite frankly, I was bored and needed a distraction. I couldn't care less if it was 2 AM or 6 AM, as it is now.

This post has been edited by Tellan: 25 April 2009 - 09:59 AM

[Anomandaris]

i didnt forget it, i just didnt think there was a need to quote it as well.

In terms of the fener, mockra and meanas arguments, i am not going to write them off as innocent, as you did, as i have no idea what they are. A lot of good points toward both sides but at the moment i would think fener is more likely inno as i doubt the killers would want to move off harmless rp as it effectively shields them from having to try and fit in. I dont rate his assertions very highly though, but alot of the reactions are interesting and already gone over quite heavily.

I am surprised that emurlahn gained 3 votes so early on, but if people disagree with my case i would say lioson might be a good bet, as they havent stopped the rp as far as i remember despite the game turning serious.

[Ruse]

Serc, on Apr 25 2009, 02:14 AM, said:

Ruse, on Apr 25 2009, 10:58 AM, said:

I kinda got the impression Fener was going to push real hard then coast the weekend, not sure why, just seemed too aggressive. Guess we can see on that one. Anyone not checked in yet? I could put a vote on someone not here easily.

That's a bit bastard, at least let someone check in before you try start a train on them.

It's not like it's hour 4...we are coming up on day's end. Rashan a pal of yours?

[Shadow]

Okay, it's not exactly a case, but here's some stuff on D'riss to consider:

D'riss, on Apr 24 2009, 04:20 PM, said:

I love yous Mockra, me ole buddy, me ole pal...yoush the best mate a bloke can have *wipes tear away* did you shay you'd buy me a beer?

D'riss, on Apr 24 2009, 04:26 PM, said:

I really love yous, Mocks me ole buddy, me ole pal

Two posts in quick succession professing his undying love of Mockra - symp signalling to his master perhaps? After that, there's a lot of general "drunken banter", some examples below:

D'riss, on Apr 24 2009, 04:57 PM, said:

I'm not wearing a hat, what you oning about? I fink yous is drunk

D'riss, on Apr 24 2009, 04:58 PM, said:

What the rat or my hat?

D'riss, on Apr 24 2009, 05:00 PM, said:

Bacon hat rat?

D'riss, on Apr 24 2009, 05:02 PM, said:

Tennis pea? Wus tha? A flower or sumfink, hic

The he decides that we need to start getting 'sherioush'. However, he makes no attempt to do so himself, instead just intimating perhaps we should start playing properly, but waiting for someone else to stick their neck out and make the first move.

D'riss, on Apr 24 2009, 05:41 PM, said:

We needs to, hic, shtart getting sherioush and shtuff, or there wone be no more beers.

D'riss, on Apr 24 2009, 05:46 PM, said:

Yeah, good idea, more beer, hic...nu,nu, no, no I means sherious about finding the *whisphers loudly* the shpy *looks around* the shpy wot knicked the thing...you know the wassaname, hic

D'riss, on Apr 24 2009, 05:53 PM, said:

Yous all liars, all of yous. Yus all trying to defla put me off the sent of the shpy. I can smells him...or prahps is Tennes again.

D'riss, on Apr 24 2009, 07:22 PM, said:

Now sherioushly, we ave to shtart finking. KEEP SHTILL all of yous. Yous all drunk and wobblin. Anyone sheen anyfing shushpshious? Cept Shadow course, coz we all noe he's wierd.

And then, D'riss final post of the day - a vote on Fener, who was the first to start getting properly serious, because of Fener's aggression to Mockra - who, as was established above, is D'riss' one and only true love.

D'riss, on Apr 24 2009, 10:33 PM, said:

About to hit the hay myself. Before I do

Vote Fener

His aggression/push to get a lynch (nothing wrong with wanting a lynch, but coupled with the other factors) + no sense of fun. Boo I'm no fan of Mockra, but I don't see what he was doing was very much different from anyone else. There are always complaints about day1 rp spam, but how else is the game supposed to get started?

Nighty night.

Any thoughts/opinions welcome.

[Gamelon]

Anomandaris, on Apr 25 2009, 03:25 AM, said:

i didnt forget it, i just didnt think there was a need to quote it as well.

In terms of the fener, mockra and meanas arguments, i am not going to write them off as innocent, as you did, as i have no idea what they are. A lot of good points toward both sides but at the moment i would think fener is more likely inno as i doubt the killers would want to move off harmless rp as it effectively shields them from having to try and fit in. I dont rate his assertions very highly though, but alot of the reactions are interesting and already gone over quite heavily.

I am surprised that emurlahn gained 3 votes so early on, but if people disagree with my case i would say lioson might be a good bet, as they havent stopped the rp as far as i remember despite the game turning serious.

Not a lot has happened since my last log-in.
Regarding Liosan: if you say killers want to let the RP continue for as long as possible to blend in, then continuing to rp while the game got serious is hardly blending in, is it?

I still think Korlat posting this:

Quote

Hey buddies -hic-
I gots some catching up ta doooo

and then not getting back at all is worth a vote. This was during the RP stage. He checks in, RPs, says he starts reading, then doesn't post again after the read. A game would bleed to death fast if that is everything people are going to do - and he could have said: 'busy, will contribute more tomorrow.'

Anyway, I'm currently considering how much I want a lynch. Starting with a weekend break is suboptimal, and due to the 24 hour limit I expect the game to develop rapidly once the timer starts to count again.

edit: cross-post with Shadow.

This post has been edited by Gamelon: 25 April 2009 - 10:45 AM

[Telas]

Well, that's the most convincing case I've heard yet. Hide your love in the spam, and then try to distance yourself from the same love in your one serious post, while at the same time voting against the one being aggressive against your love.

edit: cross post with gamelon

This post has been edited by Telas: 25 April 2009 - 10:48 AM

[Tellan]

heh
well, i've been up all night.
I got one more textbook chapter and one more lecture to go through. once i'm doen here, i'll head over to the caf to get some breakfast, at which point i'll go home and sleep for the next 6-8 hours.

before I head off to sleep I'll vote on whatever's the best semblance of a train we'd have at that time, since I believe we need to lynch to get info off trans.

[Fener]

I think we should lynch today, and it looks like it'll be tricky to get the votes. If we prefer to lynch a low poster, here are my top two choices. Either Silanah:

Silanah, on Apr 24 2009, 03:48 PM, said:

checking in briefly

Hello.....

Silanah, on Apr 24 2009, 05:50 PM, said:

ok im off for a bit now, enjoy your drunken antics people

....... and goodbye? That's it?

Or Korlat, as per Gamelon's post:

Gamelon, on Apr 25 2009, 11:43 AM, said:

I still think Korlat posting this:

Quote

Hey buddies -hic-
I gots some catching up ta doooo

and then not getting back at all is worth a vote. This was during the RP stage. He checks in, RPs, says he starts reading, then doesn't post again after the read. A game would bleed to death fast if that is everything people are going to do - and he could have said: 'busy, will contribute more tomorrow.'

[Serc]

Ruse, on Apr 25 2009, 12:40 PM, said:

Serc, on Apr 25 2009, 02:14 AM, said:

Ruse, on Apr 25 2009, 10:58 AM, said:

I kinda got the impression Fener was going to push real hard then coast the weekend, not sure why, just seemed too aggressive. Guess we can see on that one. Anyone not checked in yet? I could put a vote on someone not here easily.

That's a bit bastard, at least let someone check in before you try start a train on them.

It's not like it's hour 4...we are coming up on day's end. Rashan a pal of yours?

Not really, I just think trying to get a trains started on someone who hasnt been in and possibly might not make it in time to defend themselves is a bit scummy.

Ok, my girlfriend just got here, we'll shortly be heading off to visit my parents, go watch the rugby and then go out, so I will likely be away for a couple of hours and will definitely not be around for the end of day. Lio hasnt been around and I dont know how much info lynching him will actually give us, but I dont really know which way to go in terms of lynches. At the moment the Emur case seems to have the strongest support, but Ano does make a point about how middle of the road Tellan has been.

[D'riss]

Hi guys I'm back, miss me? No? Oh, I'm hurt. I love Shadow's case, just a pity it's on me. I can assure you it was my poor attempt at drunken humour (yes I know I would say that)...you missed the posts where he offered to buy me a drink, but never mind. And I know that the drunken spam got a bit annoying, hence my attempt to start to get serious, but at that point there wasn't much to go on. It's a bit WIFOM, but if I was a naughty, scum type person would I be so relaxed about the rp? The point is I have nothing to hide so my posts were just fun spur of the moment with (clearly) no thought. We can lynch Mockra if you like

I am going to

remove vote

because I need to reread and see which cases have now been made, 'cos we need a lynch (otherwise known as stating the bleedin obvious!). And to be fair Fener did get the game moving far better than my pathetic attempts.