Recommended Fantasy Series
#41
Posted 02 April 2009 - 08:23 AM
Lesser well known, good reads:
Codex Alera (Butcher, author of the Dresden series that is a MUST read)
Recluce series by L.E. Modisett Jr. (The Chaos Wizard stories are fun... and I've enjoyed all the others as well)
Feist's "Riftwar", "Serpentwar" series, and if you really like there are more beyond them...
All the other good ones have probably been mentioned by now...
Codex Alera (Butcher, author of the Dresden series that is a MUST read)
Recluce series by L.E. Modisett Jr. (The Chaos Wizard stories are fun... and I've enjoyed all the others as well)
Feist's "Riftwar", "Serpentwar" series, and if you really like there are more beyond them...
All the other good ones have probably been mentioned by now...
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#42
Posted 02 April 2009 - 10:15 AM
I liked Iron Council, and I'm not alone. There is more politics in it, and it's a different kind of book from PSS and TS, but it's still good on its own terms.
Also try: Janny Wurts's Wars of Light and Shadow (first book: Curse of the Mistwraith). Her earlier trilogy, The Cycle of Fire (Stormwarden; Keeper of the Keys; Shadowfane) is a great read, crossing that boundary between fantasy and SF, and is also available as an omnibus edition these days.
Also try: Janny Wurts's Wars of Light and Shadow (first book: Curse of the Mistwraith). Her earlier trilogy, The Cycle of Fire (Stormwarden; Keeper of the Keys; Shadowfane) is a great read, crossing that boundary between fantasy and SF, and is also available as an omnibus edition these days.
It is perfectly monstrous the way people go about nowadays saying things against one, behind one's back, that are absolutely and entirely true.
-- Oscar Wilde
-- Oscar Wilde
#43
Posted 02 April 2009 - 05:52 PM
If you are looking for quality writing, Gene Wolfe is your man.
#44
Posted 03 April 2009 - 09:41 AM
Dolorous Menhir, on Apr 2 2009, 06:52 PM, said:
If you are looking for quality writing, Gene Wolfe is your man.
...as a guide for what to avoid?
Seriously, I just cannot get Wolfe at all. I know many people admire him. But I honestly cannot see why.
It is perfectly monstrous the way people go about nowadays saying things against one, behind one's back, that are absolutely and entirely true.
-- Oscar Wilde
-- Oscar Wilde
#45
Posted 03 April 2009 - 08:05 PM
Cool! Those of us who like Iron Council (it's actually my favourite of the three) may be in a minority, but I'm glad to see I'm not the only one.
This recommendation may not be for everyone (which is an understatement of grandiose proportions, I think) but I absolutely adore The Aegypt Quartet (and pretty much everything else, to be honest) by John Crowley.
This recommendation may not be for everyone (which is an understatement of grandiose proportions, I think) but I absolutely adore The Aegypt Quartet (and pretty much everything else, to be honest) by John Crowley.
If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do. If some one maintains that two and two are five, or that Iceland is on the equator, you feel pity rather than anger, unless you know so little of arithmetic or geography that his opinion shakes your own contrary conviction. … So whenever you find yourself getting angry about a difference of opinion, be on your guard; you will probably find, on examination, that your belief is going beyond what the evidence warrants. Bertrand Russell
#46
Posted 03 April 2009 - 10:30 PM
@jitsuker
i've onnly read janny wurts collaboration with fiest (Empire Trilogy)
Is the rest of her writing similarly good? (assuming you've read empire
)
i've onnly read janny wurts collaboration with fiest (Empire Trilogy)
Is the rest of her writing similarly good? (assuming you've read empire
2012
"Imperial Gothos, Imperial"
"Imperial Gothos, Imperial"
#47
#48
Posted 05 April 2009 - 08:37 PM
Dolorous Menhir, on Apr 4 2009, 05:57 PM, said:
jitsukerr, on Apr 3 2009, 10:41 AM, said:
http://www.malazanempire.com/IPBforum/inde...amp;qpid=565938
That's interesting. Which books have you read?
I can understand that a lot of people struggle with the Books of the New Sun because they can be difficult to follow at times but I would recommend The Knight and The Wizard (iirc) about the boy transported to the magical world. It's really not like anything else you will have read, but the way Wolfe conjures and maintains the element of mythology and old fashioned fairy storyness (new word alert!) is so impressive. The scope and depth of imagination and originality in these books, imho, is terrific.
Victory is mine!
#49
Posted 05 April 2009 - 09:04 PM
The Wizard Knight or whatever it's called (I have the two in one volume) bugged me precisely because of the language. Without going into too much detail, I can see why Wolfe made the choices he did, inasmuch as the language fits in with the fairytale tone of the story and a certain detail about the protagonist. But this very simplicity of language became a little grating for me and I found myself longing for the stylistic flourishes of The Book of the New Sun. It's not the first time he's done this trick, he uses it in the Latro in the Mists series for other reasons, but it is the first time I've found it dulling my enjoyment of the book.
I would agree that those for whom The Book of the New Sun is a bit rich might more enjoy the rustic fare of The Wizard Knight but for me the opposite was true. I came to the table expecting to be served fois gras and got hotpot instead - that's not to say it wasn't good hotpot, but it wasn't what I'd planned on eating.
(way to overextend a metaphor there, I think...
)
I would agree that those for whom The Book of the New Sun is a bit rich might more enjoy the rustic fare of The Wizard Knight but for me the opposite was true. I came to the table expecting to be served fois gras and got hotpot instead - that's not to say it wasn't good hotpot, but it wasn't what I'd planned on eating.
(way to overextend a metaphor there, I think...
This post has been edited by stone monkey: 05 April 2009 - 09:05 PM
If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do. If some one maintains that two and two are five, or that Iceland is on the equator, you feel pity rather than anger, unless you know so little of arithmetic or geography that his opinion shakes your own contrary conviction. … So whenever you find yourself getting angry about a difference of opinion, be on your guard; you will probably find, on examination, that your belief is going beyond what the evidence warrants. Bertrand Russell
#50
Posted 06 April 2009 - 09:24 AM
Macros, on Apr 3 2009, 11:30 PM, said:
@jitsuker
i've onnly read janny wurts collaboration with fiest (Empire Trilogy)
Is the rest of her writing similarly good? (assuming you've read empire
)
i've onnly read janny wurts collaboration with fiest (Empire Trilogy)
Is the rest of her writing similarly good? (assuming you've read empire
Um. Um. Well, no. The Empire trilogy marries the best of both authors, I think -- both come off looking much better than either individually.
The Cycle of Fire is probably Wurts's best writing. In Wars of Light and Shadow there are characters (too many characters) with verbal patterns never before seen in human speech. Excessively florid and contrived exchanges of 'repartee' leave me gritting my teeth a lot. But the world is amazing, and the plot is very engaging. Give it a try.
re: Wolfe. I tried to read the Claw of the Conciliator (that the first of the books of the New Sun, right? It was a while ago). Didn't get more than 20 pages in before I gave up.
It is perfectly monstrous the way people go about nowadays saying things against one, behind one's back, that are absolutely and entirely true.
-- Oscar Wilde
-- Oscar Wilde
#51
Posted 06 April 2009 - 03:15 PM
The Claw of the Conciliator is the second book. Hope you didn't try to start the series with that one!
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
#52
Posted 06 April 2009 - 03:45 PM
HoosierDaddy, on Apr 2 2009, 04:23 AM, said:
Lesser well known, good reads:
Feist's "Riftwar", "Serpentwar" series, and if you really like there are more beyond them...
Feist's "Riftwar", "Serpentwar" series, and if you really like there are more beyond them...
I second this. While I can't say I've been a fan of his more recent series, I did very much enjoy his first few based in the world of Midkemia. It's nothing epic, but a good read nevertheless.
#53
Posted 06 April 2009 - 05:51 PM
stone monkey, on Apr 5 2009, 10:04 PM, said:
The Wizard Knight or whatever it's called (I have the two in one volume) bugged me precisely because of the language. Without going into too much detail, I can see why Wolfe made the choices he did, inasmuch as the language fits in with the fairytale tone of the story and a certain detail about the protagonist. But this very simplicity of language became a little grating for me and I found myself longing for the stylistic flourishes of The Book of the New Sun. It's not the first time he's done this trick, he uses it in the Latro in the Mists series for other reasons, but it is the first time I've found it dulling my enjoyment of the book.
I would agree that those for whom The Book of the New Sun is a bit rich might more enjoy the rustic fare of The Wizard Knight but for me the opposite was true. I came to the table expecting to be served fois gras and got hotpot instead - that's not to say it wasn't good hotpot, but it wasn't what I'd planned on eating.
(way to overextend a metaphor there, I think...
)
I would agree that those for whom The Book of the New Sun is a bit rich might more enjoy the rustic fare of The Wizard Knight but for me the opposite was true. I came to the table expecting to be served fois gras and got hotpot instead - that's not to say it wasn't good hotpot, but it wasn't what I'd planned on eating.
(way to overextend a metaphor there, I think...
Setting aside the Wizard Knight, you seem to have enjoyed the Book of the New Sun. In that case, and if you haven't already, you should definitely read the Urth of the New Sun (a 1-book direct follow-up) and the Book of the Long Sun (somewhat related four-parter). The Urth of the New Sun was all right (for Wolfe), but I loved the Book of the Long Sun when I read it recently.
Still have to get to the Book of the Short Sun.
This post has been edited by Dolorous Menhir: 06 April 2009 - 05:51 PM
#54
Posted 06 April 2009 - 10:32 PM
I can't believe I haven't mentioned these in this thread already: the three Master Li and Number Ten Ox books by Barry Hughart. Witty, whimsically blackhearted, funny as all get out and only just republished in one volume, after nearly 20 years out of print. Buy them, if we're lucky it'll encourage him to write more of them...
This post has been edited by stone monkey: 06 April 2009 - 10:32 PM
If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do. If some one maintains that two and two are five, or that Iceland is on the equator, you feel pity rather than anger, unless you know so little of arithmetic or geography that his opinion shakes your own contrary conviction. … So whenever you find yourself getting angry about a difference of opinion, be on your guard; you will probably find, on examination, that your belief is going beyond what the evidence warrants. Bertrand Russell
#55
Posted 07 April 2009 - 10:29 AM
Re Wolfe: Fair enough, SM. Whilst the writing style of The Wizard Knight never turned sour enough to annoy me, there was a certain degree of "scene jumping" that threw me off on a regular basis, but something about this technique in within the overall style struck me as appropriate. Gene Wolfe is nothing if not a consumate writer and you have to admire his ability to truly explore new styles of writing (that and ihs almost awe-inspiring grasp of language and grammar!)
Personally, I also preferred The Book of The New Sun, and Severian remians with me as an extraordinary character to this day.
Personally, I also preferred The Book of The New Sun, and Severian remians with me as an extraordinary character to this day.
Victory is mine!
#56
Posted 07 April 2009 - 12:46 PM
Nah, I started with the first book. So whatever that one is, I didn't get on with it.
It is perfectly monstrous the way people go about nowadays saying things against one, behind one's back, that are absolutely and entirely true.
-- Oscar Wilde
-- Oscar Wilde
#57
Posted 08 April 2009 - 02:16 AM
Interesting to read about Gene Wolfe because the only book of his that i've read was " The Wizard Knight " !
I absolutley hated it and it put me off reading anything else by him. I found it a real chore to get through and whilst I can acknowledge different writng styles, this just didn't work for me. I found the style "lumpy" and the narrative thread was too disjointed to get me involved with the characters. From what some of you are saying, this is not indicative of his normal work ?
I might give him another go, where would be a good place to start ?
I absolutley hated it and it put me off reading anything else by him. I found it a real chore to get through and whilst I can acknowledge different writng styles, this just didn't work for me. I found the style "lumpy" and the narrative thread was too disjointed to get me involved with the characters. From what some of you are saying, this is not indicative of his normal work ?
I might give him another go, where would be a good place to start ?
Now all the friends that you knew in school they used to be so cool, now they just bore you.
Just look at em' now, already pullin' the plow. So quick to take to grain, like some old mule.
Just look at em' now, already pullin' the plow. So quick to take to grain, like some old mule.
#58
Posted 08 April 2009 - 09:03 AM
That's right, mate, the style in Wizard Knight is deliberate to fit with the story. I guess it either works for you or it doesn't and I can see how it might irritate a lot of people. The Book of the New Sun, the story of Severian the executioner would be, I think, the best place to start with Wolfe. There are a few in the series or you can get them in two compilations, iirc.
Shadow and Claw (contains volume 1 and 2) and Sword and Citadel (volumes 3 and 4) are easy to find on Amazon.
Shadow and Claw (contains volume 1 and 2) and Sword and Citadel (volumes 3 and 4) are easy to find on Amazon.
Victory is mine!
#59
Posted 08 April 2009 - 04:12 PM
I'd also check eBay and AbeBooks, you can sometimes find 'em pretty cheap there. I got my 4-book omnibus off eBay for like $7 shipped.
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
#60
Posted 08 April 2009 - 05:24 PM
masan's saddle, on Apr 8 2009, 03:16 AM, said:
Interesting to read about Gene Wolfe because the only book of his that i've read was " The Wizard Knight " !
I absolutley hated it and it put me off reading anything else by him. I found it a real chore to get through and whilst I can acknowledge different writng styles, this just didn't work for me. I found the style "lumpy" and the narrative thread was too disjointed to get me involved with the characters. From what some of you are saying, this is not indicative of his normal work ?
I might give him another go, where would be a good place to start ?
I absolutley hated it and it put me off reading anything else by him. I found it a real chore to get through and whilst I can acknowledge different writng styles, this just didn't work for me. I found the style "lumpy" and the narrative thread was too disjointed to get me involved with the characters. From what some of you are saying, this is not indicative of his normal work ?
I might give him another go, where would be a good place to start ?
Depends what you mean by his style. You can read a passages from the Wizard Knight and the Book of the New Sun and know that Wolfe wrote both, but that doesn't mean the styles are the same. It would be interesting to know what you mean by his style, and what you didn't like about it. For example, if I had to list essential Wolfean elements, I would say:
- central characters travel widely on fantastic adventure
- potentially unreliable narrator (a youngish child in the Wizard Knight, a Memento-type amnesiac in the Latro books, etc)
- a wandering plotline that covers much ground
- large cast of supporting characters who regularly reappear in a manner that rarely appears contrived
- strong mystical/religious themes, in particular Christian/Catholic influences
- very, very obscure explanation of what is really going on (Wolfe doesn't do infodumps, he casually drops hints and references and expects you to work it out)
- adept mixing of science-fiction and fantasy themes, technology, plot devices
- an elegant and archaic use of language (elaborate, flowing sentences and obscure vocabulary)
- excellent and evocative description and characterisation
Do you think the above is a good list? Which elements did you dislike? I would say they were present to various degrees in all of his books I've read so far (making progress on reading them all).
This post has been edited by Dolorous Menhir: 08 April 2009 - 05:25 PM

Help


















