Mafia 40.75 or is that 39.62?
#602
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:18 PM
Telas, on Mar 10 2009, 04:11 PM, said:
maybe we have paired finders?
*is hopeful*
*is hopeful*
As long as it's not Slilanah and Korlat
then we may just be fucked.
And the bait and response stay in the case files until needed/If needed.
Don't feel I'm picking on just you. It is how I feel people out, and then what I use to make cases with later.
#603
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:21 PM
Right, finally finished my readthrough.
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
#604
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:25 PM
Fener, on Mar 10 2009, 04:21 PM, said:
Right, finally finished my readthrough.
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
well back it then.
#605
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:27 PM
Huh, forgot my views on Korlat.
He has been really quite aggressive and pushy, which explains the amount of attention I guess. However, I didn't find anything he has said particularly scummy and like I said in my previous post, I feel you would have to be an amazingly ballsy and skilled player to be scum playing like this because it attracts so much attention, which should mean you will remain at least vaguely on people's radars for a while. If you are scum and pull this off Korlat, Kudos but I don't think you are.
He has been really quite aggressive and pushy, which explains the amount of attention I guess. However, I didn't find anything he has said particularly scummy and like I said in my previous post, I feel you would have to be an amazingly ballsy and skilled player to be scum playing like this because it attracts so much attention, which should mean you will remain at least vaguely on people's radars for a while. If you are scum and pull this off Korlat, Kudos but I don't think you are.
#606
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:28 PM
D'riss, on Mar 10 2009, 08:25 PM, said:
Fener, on Mar 10 2009, 04:21 PM, said:
Right, finally finished my readthrough.
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
well back it then.
I did, by voting you:P
#607
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:30 PM
Fener, on Mar 10 2009, 04:28 PM, said:
D'riss, on Mar 10 2009, 08:25 PM, said:
Fener, on Mar 10 2009, 04:21 PM, said:
Right, finally finished my readthrough.
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
well back it then.
I did, by voting you:P
Go Back to lurking then
OMGUS
Vote Fener
for a drive by with no case
#608
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:48 PM
D'riss, on Mar 10 2009, 04:30 PM, said:
Fener, on Mar 10 2009, 04:28 PM, said:
D'riss, on Mar 10 2009, 08:25 PM, said:
Fener, on Mar 10 2009, 04:21 PM, said:
Right, finally finished my readthrough.
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
well back it then.
I did, by voting you:P
Go Back to lurking then
OMGUS
Vote Fener
for a drive by with no case
Hmmm. I would have thought your vote better placed because he can't spell your name. But in fact he did explain his vote. Not really a case, but it wasn't just drop a vote and then leave. besides doen't Sil have more votes than you, why the anger?
#609
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:48 PM
D'riss, on Mar 10 2009, 08:30 PM, said:
Go Back to lurking then
OMGUS
Vote Fener
for a drive by with no case
OMGUS
Vote Fener
for a drive by with no case
Wait what? There was a case of sorts there, what are you on about? (Here's me leaping to someone else's defense again *sigh*)
EDIT: Crosspost
This post has been edited by Silanah: 10 March 2009 - 08:48 PM
#610
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:48 PM
I outlined my reasons for voting for you. You called out a rather obviously sarcastic sentence and tried to present it as a reveal. You then tried to take things out of context to strengthen your argument. That's scummy behaviour to me.
#611
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:49 PM
D'riss, on Mar 10 2009, 10:30 PM, said:
Fener, on Mar 10 2009, 04:28 PM, said:
D'riss, on Mar 10 2009, 08:25 PM, said:
Fener, on Mar 10 2009, 04:21 PM, said:
Right, finally finished my readthrough.
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
well back it then.
I did, by voting you:P
Go Back to lurking then
OMGUS
Vote Fener
for a drive by with no case
huh, surely his post was quite well made. And there'd hardly be a point of making even another case on you.
I don't think you're looking particularly scummy as of yet, but considering how people react to my terrible aggression, tunnel vision, post count, and jokes, I'm not particularly surprised other people find you scummy.
And Gamelon, I should say the same to you as I did Shadow in the beginning, but somehow I don't have the heart to. I know how long you've wanted to do that

#612
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:52 PM
Anomandaris, on Mar 10 2009, 04:48 PM, said:
D'riss, on Mar 10 2009, 04:30 PM, said:
Fener, on Mar 10 2009, 04:28 PM, said:
D'riss, on Mar 10 2009, 08:25 PM, said:
Fener, on Mar 10 2009, 04:21 PM, said:
Right, finally finished my readthrough.
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
It is interesting that most of the trains are based around Korlat. Either on him or based on his actions. For me, if you were scum, then you wouldn't attract so much attention in the first day, so I would feel that he probably isn't scum.
With regard to Dr'iss, I feel it is a bit weird he chose to read Korlat's line as revealing finder when it seemed pretty clear to me that he was just being sarcastic in that post. I think he then quoted the post out of context to drum up more support. All in all, some strange behaviour if you were innocent so I would feel best lynching him today.
On Silanah, I can kind of see why he defended Korlat but I do agree that his argument seems suspect to me and does suggest scum. I would be willing to vote on him if the train is on him at the end of the day.
Rashan for me is also a little suspicious. My view of his pissing match was that he seemed to be being particularly obnoxious for no reason, kind of inciting a pissing match. This didn't attract too much attention on him but gave him posts and definitely takes him out of the lying low category, which may mean he doesn't come under suspicion for a while, so could have been a clever scum move.
So there you go, my views. and I am willing to back them up, so
Vote Dr'iss
well back it then.
I did, by voting you:P
Go Back to lurking then
OMGUS
Vote Fener
for a drive by with no case
Hmmm. I would have thought your vote better placed because he can't spell your name. But in fact he did explain his vote. Not really a case, but it wasn't just drop a vote and then leave. besides doen't Sil have more votes than you, why the anger?
I'm just getting tired of people saying all this stuff then not making a case. Not posting defendable quotes. He says I took and posted a quote out of context. Where?. I just want something to defend against.

Remove Vote
#613
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:52 PM
And thats me out for an hour or 2. Back in a while.
#614
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:55 PM
it's ironic that after posting that Game dissapeared... lol
there's about 6 hours left, i'm gonna go look at the voting spread again.
there's about 6 hours left, i'm gonna go look at the voting spread again.
#615
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:59 PM
so it's 6:4:4 for Silanah:Korlat:D'riss right now
the fact that there hasn't been a major pileup on a single play as usually happens on Day 1 (Ano's worst nightmare, apparently) is curious.
we have an almost equal distribution between three players.
makes me think at least one of the 3's gotta be scum...
the fact that there hasn't been a major pileup on a single play as usually happens on Day 1 (Ano's worst nightmare, apparently) is curious.
we have an almost equal distribution between three players.
makes me think at least one of the 3's gotta be scum...
#616
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:05 PM
Ok, I have to apologise to D'riss. I mixed up you and Serc. It is Serc who I found more suspicious. He was the one who actually laid a vote on Korlat for his "reveal" and then posted the following post, which takes Korlat's remarks out of context and tries to portray them in an altogether different light. This in addition to his rather weird response of simply "no" to a request for him to contribute (I will at a stretch allow that for a poor attempt at humour) has put him on my radar.
This ...
... is sort of an obvious attempt from you to insinuate being a Finder.
so
Remove Vote Vote Serc
Serc, on Mar 10 2009, 01:06 AM, said:
Korlat, on Mar 9 2009, 06:02 PM, said:
I get up for a piss, check the thread and find people thinking I made a finder reveal? Read the tone of the post for christ sake. How can you possibly read that line, in the context of the rest of the text, as some kind of attempted reveal.
This ...
Korlat, on Mar 9 2009, 04:34 PM, said:
I'll try not to call you out on anything until I get a pm from PS saying that you're definitly scum.
... is sort of an obvious attempt from you to insinuate being a Finder.
so
Remove Vote Vote Serc
#617
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:08 PM
Telas, on Mar 10 2009, 10:59 PM, said:
so it's 6:4:4 for Silanah:Korlat:D'riss right now
the fact that there hasn't been a major pileup on a single play as usually happens on Day 1 (Ano's worst nightmare, apparently) is curious.
we have an almost equal distribution between three players.
makes me think at least one of the 3's gotta be scum...
the fact that there hasn't been a major pileup on a single play as usually happens on Day 1 (Ano's worst nightmare, apparently) is curious.
we have an almost equal distribution between three players.
makes me think at least one of the 3's gotta be scum...
And Silanah is the best option. At least better than Korlat, who's a terribly misunderstood but good man.
#618
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:08 PM
Serc's apparently sick, so i'm cutting him some slack, because of that.
otherwise I'd be voting him (and I was, for most of the day yesterday)
anyhow, dinner time.
I'm gonna have a late meeting tonight, but should still be back before the deadline, even if just barely.
So i'm not voting now.
like I said above, just from the vote patterns and the fact that we don't have a single dominant train makes me think there's gotta be at least one train on scum, but I need to think which one it is.
later, all.
otherwise I'd be voting him (and I was, for most of the day yesterday)
anyhow, dinner time.
I'm gonna have a late meeting tonight, but should still be back before the deadline, even if just barely.
So i'm not voting now.
like I said above, just from the vote patterns and the fact that we don't have a single dominant train makes me think there's gotta be at least one train on scum, but I need to think which one it is.
later, all.
#619
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:13 PM
#620
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:22 PM
D'riss, on Mar 10 2009, 11:13 PM, said:
Yesterday I was not busy and in a not of best moods, today I am in equally if not worse mood but have more to do. So, better then to lay low for a little while, I've given enough of myself to this thread for you to judge my alignment many times over. At least compared to most others here.
This post has been edited by Korlat: 10 March 2009 - 09:23 PM