[Galain]

Omtose, on Feb 10 2009, 08:20 PM, said:

I back briefly before next classes.

To clarify Tennes, in your Kaschan defense post you listed me. But if you look back that post was talking about the 100 posts in the sign-up thread. How it was unless, a waste of time, and hilarious.

Waste of time?

[Tennes]

Omtose, on Feb 10 2009, 06:20 PM, said:

I back briefly before next classes.

To clarify Tennes, in your Kaschan defense post you listed me. But if you look back that post was talking about the 100 posts in the sign-up thread. How it was unless, a waste of time, and hilarious.

Sorry if I misrepresented you, but the post directly above yours was this one:

Ampelas, on Feb 10 2009, 04:02 PM, said:

Omtose, on Feb 10 2009, 04:00 PM, said:

Ampelas, on Feb 10 2009, 10:58 AM, said:

Galayn Lord, on Feb 10 2009, 03:51 PM, said:

so, do we have any other suspects, or are we all stuck in a Galin-induced "Kaschan is a leader" loop?

Well, there doesn't seem to have been much serious discussion apart from the topic. Noone has really raised themselves above the parapet.

I think I will lay a vote on in the hope of getting some serious discussion.

Vote Omtose

My reasoning being that he came in several hours late, and didn't seem to try to catch up on the reading before spamming, and started off this latest bout of spamming, without realising we had kind of moved onto "serious" cases already. Also, he wanted me to delete one of my posts!

I certainly did catch up, but really serious talk like 5 hours into 36 hour day on Day 1, absurd. Plus it was a day 1 case, lets be real, it wasn't great heh.

So what are your views on the case? No merit to it? Korlat not raise your suspicions over his activity at all? I don't buy the whole Kaschan is his leader but Korlat was still being rather too aggressively defensive

So you can see why I might have got confused.

[Omtose]

For the people who decided to read though, for posters it was great.

[Liosan]

NO YOU!

[Omtose]

@Tennes- NP, I understand. We were talking about a variety of things at that point. Some spam and some serious.

[Galain]

Hoods path clarification.
I was not criticising the ethic in general of not refreshing.

If you go back and see the specific post I referred it essentially says "Ok, I wont bother then. Vote galain".
Not massively thouhgtful.

As for the Ano thing, I had not realized that the firsts and thirds could communicate, so however long I thought on it wouldn't have made a difference.

[Galain]

Omtose, on Feb 10 2009, 08:22 PM, said:

For the people who decided to read though, for posters it was great.

*bows*

[Omtose]

Omtose, on Feb 10 2009, 11:07 AM, said:

Some merit to it, but not enough that I would instantly lynch. I really doubt that Kaschan is the leader. Also yeah Korlat was being defensive, I can see that, but it isn't like he is scum out here. It is something I would consider keeping on eye on, maybe he is very defensive because he is a first and doesn't want to die yet?

@Amp

This is what I thought of the case so far. Which we then talked about for a bit.

[Galain]

Omtose, on Feb 10 2009, 08:23 PM, said:

@Tennes- NP, I understand. We were talking about a variety of things at that point. Some spam and some serious.

Only some spam?

Boo, sirrah, I say

[Galain]

Liosan, on Feb 10 2009, 08:22 PM, said:

NO YOU!

[Insert appropriate pic here]

[Tennes]

Omtose, on Feb 10 2009, 06:25 PM, said:

Omtose, on Feb 10 2009, 11:07 AM, said:

Some merit to it, but not enough that I would instantly lynch. I really doubt that Kaschan is the leader. Also yeah Korlat was being defensive, I can see that, but it isn't like he is scum out here. It is something I would consider keeping on eye on, maybe he is very defensive because he is a first and doesn't want to die yet?

@Amp

This is what I thought of the case so far. Which we then talked about for a bit.

Yep, you're right. I apologise.

[Telas]

Galain, on Feb 10 2009, 08:13 PM, said:

1st + 3rd kills 1st.

Thats how I read it.
And it makes sense, too.

Right, that seems settled then. I assume the 1st and 3rd would need to be on the same team - hence the offthread comms.

[Omtose]

Galain, on Feb 10 2009, 01:25 PM, said:

Omtose, on Feb 10 2009, 08:23 PM, said:

@Tennes- NP, I understand. We were talking about a variety of things at that point. Some spam and some serious.

Only some spam?

Boo, sirrah, I say

Well like 2/3s spam. We talked about how I was a jedi, and that in a fight of jedi vs. segulah the jedi wins. Therefore I decided the game should be called because I won. It's like a lion among sheep I guess.

[Galain]

Telas, on Feb 10 2009, 08:26 PM, said:

Galain, on Feb 10 2009, 08:13 PM, said:

1st + 3rd kills 1st.

Thats how I read it.
And it makes sense, too.

Right, that seems settled then. I assume the 1st and 3rd would need to be on the same team - hence the offthread comms.

Dunno if they'd need to be on the same team.

Probably not though, cause realistically, why would clan make a difference in a sword duel?

[Galain]

Omtose, on Feb 10 2009, 08:27 PM, said:

Galain, on Feb 10 2009, 01:25 PM, said:

Omtose, on Feb 10 2009, 08:23 PM, said:

@Tennes- NP, I understand. We were talking about a variety of things at that point. Some spam and some serious.

Only some spam?

Boo, sirrah, I say

Well like 2/3s spam. We talked about how I was a jedi, and that in a fight of jedi vs. segulah the jedi wins. Therefore I decided the game should be called because I won. It's like a lion among sheep I guess.

You're a jedi!

Its on!

[Mockra]

O.o

Anyway...I'll be back in ~2.5/3 hours. To the person on this page who didn't think a First + Third could kill a First....how, then, does a First ever die? O_O
Some people are just plain stupid.

[Serc]

... 13 pages of mostly spam ... after 8 hours.

Oh, lovely.

[Galain]

Mockra, on Feb 10 2009, 09:30 PM, said:

O.o

Anyway...I'll be back in ~2.5/3 hours. To the person on this page who didn't think a First + Third could kill a First....how, then, does a First ever die? O_O
Some people are just plain stupid.

The other two firsts.
Duh.

But after that point, lynch.

[Galain]

Serc, on Feb 10 2009, 09:30 PM, said:

... 13 pages of mostly spam ... after 8 hours.

Oh, lovely.

*Glares at serc*

Even after this game, I still don't wanna stop doing that

[Galain]

Omtose?