[Kaschan]

After re-reading the thread, I admit I that I am super convinced by something

remove vote

vote Tennes

[Kaschan]

Actually, no, that other argument was indeed way better

remove vote

vote Galain



Sorry I'm pissed. Well, I brought this on myself in a way by falling in Galain's trap, but I have to repeat that in Korlat's case, I wonder what is his damned problem, I could have done without his vote.

Why on earth would anyone behave like that is beyond me. It better be a purposeful frame.

[Korlat]

Kaschan, on Feb 11 2009, 02:34 PM, said:

After re-reading the thread, I admit I that I am super convinced by something

remove vote

vote Tennes

huh...

[Korlat]

Kaschan, on Feb 11 2009, 02:37 PM, said:

Actually, no, that other argument was indeed way better

remove vote

vote Galain



Sorry I'm pissed. Well, I brought this on myself in a way by falling in Galain's trap, but I have to repeat that in Korlat's case, I wonder what is his damned problem, I could have done without his vote.

Why on earth would anyone behave like that is beyond me. It better be a purposeful frame.

How could i be purposefully make make galain jump to crazy conclusions!!

[Kaschan]

And no, Korlat, you're not a stupid symp since I'm not your leader.

But you say yourself that in this game everyone is a symp, so why in hell would you jump on my train to respond to the "accusations" that you're a symp? TWICE?

Blows my mind.

[Kaschan]

Why did you care about the accusations? How does lynching me help, there's no rank CF.

You really think you can get away with the "hell, I helped his lynch, if that doesn't prove it I don't know what will!" ?

[Hood's Path]

Kaschan, on Feb 11 2009, 08:29 AM, said:

Hood's Path, on Feb 11 2009, 04:27 PM, said:

1) You are one of two viable lynching candidates. I don't think it's realistic to doubt any longer that either you or Galain will be lynched today.
2) Galain I think is almost certainly a BM - it took me a while to come to that decision and I may be wrong, but I think it's a safe risk and I don't think I'll lack for help come nighttime if you take my meaning.
3) You could very well be ranked and I wouldn't risk trying to kill you at night to put this mess behind us. Either way, worst case scenario is that you're the 7th of my faction, which would be disastrous but I'm betting that you're not.

So you're basically say that you realized that Galain was also a lynch candidate (since all you want is a lynch, even though you "like me"), but somehow you think he's a BM for reasons you won't say but really hope are true?

Jolly

I struggled with Galain for a long while, as is evident from my posts. My growing assurance that he is unranked starting with his claim that he didn't know that 1sts and 3rds could communicate. As much as I think he was trying to mess with everybody's heads, I believed that he truly had no idea that 1sts and 3rds could communicate. I have a hard time believing a ranked player would start posting like he did without even trying to understand what his role was. It also makes his behaviour understandable to me - great symps often start that way. I could be wrong but I'm willing to take the risk and try to kill him tonight and I'm hoping at least one other agrees with me *wink wink nudge nudge*. With both of you dead, we can move past this particular argument and have less spam to deal with. Ideal IMO. I am sorry but that's how I see it

[Korlat]

Kaschan, on Feb 11 2009, 02:38 PM, said:

And no, Korlat, you're not a stupid symp since I'm not your leader.

But you say yourself that in this game everyone is a symp, so why in hell would you jump on my train to respond to the "accusations" that you're a symp? TWICE?

Blows my mind.

You aren't not my leader, im happy enough to lynch anyone who is not my leader.
Especially on day one.

[D'riss]

Edit: My refresh button fails.

This post has been edited by D'riss: 11 February 2009 - 02:46 PM

[Kaschan]

Hood's Path, on Feb 11 2009, 04:41 PM, said:

I struggled with Galain for a long while, as is evident from my posts. My growing assurance that he is unranked starting with his claim that he didn't know that 1sts and 3rds could communicate. As much as I think he was trying to mess with everybody's heads, I believed that he truly had no idea that 1sts and 3rds could communicate. I have a hard time believing a ranked player would start posting like he did without even trying to understand what his role was. It also makes his behaviour understandable to me - great symps often start that way. I could be wrong but I'm willing to take the risk and try to kill him tonight and I'm hoping at least one other agrees with me *wink wink nudge nudge*. With both of you dead, we can move past this particular argument and have less spam to deal with. Ideal IMO. I am sorry but that's how I see it

What is this 1st and 3rd thingy all you guys are talking about?

[Kaschan]

Korlat, on Feb 11 2009, 04:42 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Feb 11 2009, 02:38 PM, said:

And no, Korlat, you're not a stupid symp since I'm not your leader.

But you say yourself that in this game everyone is a symp, so why in hell would you jump on my train to respond to the "accusations" that you're a symp? TWICE?

Blows my mind.

You aren't not my leader, im happy enough to lynch anyone who is not my leader.
Especially on day one.

You're just happy to vote in whichever direction someone asks you to

[Korlat]

D'riss, on Feb 11 2009, 02:46 PM, said:

Edit: My refresh button fails.

discuss what?


welcome to the game BTW

[Tennes]

Kaschan, on Feb 11 2009, 02:46 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Feb 11 2009, 04:41 PM, said:

I struggled with Galain for a long while, as is evident from my posts. My growing assurance that he is unranked starting with his claim that he didn't know that 1sts and 3rds could communicate. As much as I think he was trying to mess with everybody's heads, I believed that he truly had no idea that 1sts and 3rds could communicate. I have a hard time believing a ranked player would start posting like he did without even trying to understand what his role was. It also makes his behaviour understandable to me - great symps often start that way. I could be wrong but I'm willing to take the risk and try to kill him tonight and I'm hoping at least one other agrees with me *wink wink nudge nudge*. With both of you dead, we can move past this particular argument and have less spam to deal with. Ideal IMO. I am sorry but that's how I see it

What is this 1st and 3rd thingy all you guys are talking about?

[D'riss]

Kaschan, on Feb 11 2009, 09:46 AM, said:

Hood's Path, on Feb 11 2009, 04:41 PM, said:

I struggled with Galain for a long while, as is evident from my posts. My growing assurance that he is unranked starting with his claim that he didn't know that 1sts and 3rds could communicate. As much as I think he was trying to mess with everybody's heads, I believed that he truly had no idea that 1sts and 3rds could communicate. I have a hard time believing a ranked player would start posting like he did without even trying to understand what his role was. It also makes his behaviour understandable to me - great symps often start that way. I could be wrong but I'm willing to take the risk and try to kill him tonight and I'm hoping at least one other agrees with me *wink wink nudge nudge*. With both of you dead, we can move past this particular argument and have less spam to deal with. Ideal IMO. I am sorry but that's how I see it

What is this 1st and 3rd thingy all you guys are talking about?

Galain mentioned earlier that he was unaware 1sts and 3rds could communicate off-thread.

[Liosan]

Korlat, on Feb 11 2009, 02:42 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Feb 11 2009, 02:38 PM, said:

And no, Korlat, you're not a stupid symp since I'm not your leader.

But you say yourself that in this game everyone is a symp, so why in hell would you jump on my train to respond to the "accusations" that you're a symp? TWICE?

Blows my mind.

You aren't not my leader, im happy enough to lynch anyone who is not my leader.
Especially on day one.

errrr arent not? so your saying he is your leader? 

[Korlat]

Kaschan, on Feb 11 2009, 02:46 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Feb 11 2009, 04:41 PM, said:

I struggled with Galain for a long while, as is evident from my posts. My growing assurance that he is unranked starting with his claim that he didn't know that 1sts and 3rds could communicate. As much as I think he was trying to mess with everybody's heads, I believed that he truly had no idea that 1sts and 3rds could communicate. I have a hard time believing a ranked player would start posting like he did without even trying to understand what his role was. It also makes his behaviour understandable to me - great symps often start that way. I could be wrong but I'm willing to take the risk and try to kill him tonight and I'm hoping at least one other agrees with me *wink wink nudge nudge*. With both of you dead, we can move past this particular argument and have less spam to deal with. Ideal IMO. I am sorry but that's how I see it

What is this 1st and 3rd thingy all you guys are talking about?

Mafia Fail

[Galain]

Liosan, on Feb 11 2009, 05:48 PM, said:

Korlat, on Feb 11 2009, 02:42 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Feb 11 2009, 02:38 PM, said:

And no, Korlat, you're not a stupid symp since I'm not your leader.

But you say yourself that in this game everyone is a symp, so why in hell would you jump on my train to respond to the "accusations" that you're a symp? TWICE?

Blows my mind.

You aren't not my leader, im happy enough to lynch anyone who is not my leader.
Especially on day one.

errrr arent not? so your saying he is your leader?

Symp fail.

[Hood's Path]

Kaschan, on Feb 11 2009, 08:46 AM, said:

Hood's Path, on Feb 11 2009, 04:41 PM, said:

I struggled with Galain for a long while, as is evident from my posts. My growing assurance that he is unranked starting with his claim that he didn't know that 1sts and 3rds could communicate. As much as I think he was trying to mess with everybody's heads, I believed that he truly had no idea that 1sts and 3rds could communicate. I have a hard time believing a ranked player would start posting like he did without even trying to understand what his role was. It also makes his behaviour understandable to me - great symps often start that way. I could be wrong but I'm willing to take the risk and try to kill him tonight and I'm hoping at least one other agrees with me *wink wink nudge nudge*. With both of you dead, we can move past this particular argument and have less spam to deal with. Ideal IMO. I am sorry but that's how I see it

What is this 1st and 3rd thingy all you guys are talking about?

I gave him heat about his stupid case on Ano because he suggested that Ano and somebody else were the 1st and 3rd of a faction and that one of them was signalling the other. But if you have even a cursory understanding of the rules, you'd know that was too stupid to be believed. Anyway, he replied that he didn't know that the leaders could communicate. I believed him *shrugs*

[Korlat]

Liosan, on Feb 11 2009, 02:48 PM, said:

Korlat, on Feb 11 2009, 02:42 PM, said:

Kaschan, on Feb 11 2009, 02:38 PM, said:

And no, Korlat, you're not a stupid symp since I'm not your leader.

But you say yourself that in this game everyone is a symp, so why in hell would you jump on my train to respond to the "accusations" that you're a symp? TWICE?

Blows my mind.

You aren't not my leader, im happy enough to lynch anyone who is not my leader.
Especially on day one.

errrr arent not? so your saying he is your leader? 

Yes thats exactly what i am saying
HELLO EVERYONE I AM NOT NOT SAYING THAT KASCHAN IS NOT NOT MY CLAN LEADER....NOT!!!!


Go home

[Kaschan]

Man, I should go, people stop getting my jokes


Anyways, it was fun. I die and raised hell while my leaders were safe, and at the same time a whole team has been highlighted.