Hoods path:
Begins the day joking about.
Hood's Path, on Jan 19 2009, 03:59 PM, said:
Kessobahn, on Jan 19 2009, 07:50 AM, said:
it will always be gut on the first day, and in all honesty I am of two minds about Omtose. For one I don't like the post and the nervousness it radiates, but at the same time I do recognice that small things become huge in the absence of larger blocks of information – which is essentially why day 1 lynches are as odd as they are – ergo I may be less objective in this regard than I would've liked. Omtose is a strong player, if a bit too willing to parrot my every say in an attempt to seem wise, and so I am not quite convinced we should move to lynch him today..
But at the same time, he seems to guilty!
He does seem very guilty! The thing about it is he's not really doing anything to deny the guilt. It seems odd to me, at first he was nervous about it and now he's throwing it all out there in a way. Very erratic behaviour! An attempt at some reverse psychology perhaps?
Little comment about omtoses fake reveal, how he seems very guilty. Doesn't actually say much here, doesn't commit to anything.
Hood's Path, on Jan 19 2009, 08:37 PM, said:
Well I personally haven't seen anybody post anything blatantly suspicious, so there doesn't seem to be much point to vote unless it's as a joke. I pay more attention to a person's behaviour than whether or not they've been racking up the posts. I'm not going to vote someone just because they haven't posted ten times in the first eight hours.
Defense of low-posters here seems reasonable enough.
Hasn't seen anything suspicious.
Again, doesn't get involved. Very non commital.
Very middle of the road, which is a place where scum generally reside.
Then another post defending low posters.
Hood's Path, on Jan 20 2009, 02:53 PM, said:
Morning all! Just finished catching up.
I didn't really look closely enough at Serc until Liosan pulled everything together. None of his statements are terribly damning initially but put them back to back like that and they start to look less offhanded. He mentioned the witch using her BP on day one several times. It seems a bit early to me to be pushing this kind of action. Why not use it later on when numbers are a bit more of a factor? I think he was pushing to use it now and get it out of the way while it would do the least harm. I don't see any real advantage in repeating day one.
I'm not one hundred percent convinced, but this case seems much stronger than the one that was being built against Omtose.
vote serc
Votes serc. Didn't look closely, which strikes me as odd, since generally people look closely at people in mafia. Only the scum aren't looking as much.
Important points in this post:
1. He says he isn't 100 percent convinced, which is very convinient for him later if serc comes up innocent. Again, he is massively middle of the road.
2. He says he dissagrees with the witch using the BP. Bear this in mind.
Hood's Path, on Jan 20 2009, 06:10 PM, said:
I'm not sure why you find my statement and vote suspicious. I was simply pointing out the fact that Serc's comments did not seem troublesome until you look at them as a whole. Lisoan's post came as part of my first opportunity to look at all of the posts once I signed in for the morning. I came to the conclusion after reading through everyone's comments. I really don't see the advantage of using the bp right away and having a repeat of day one. Serc's actions seem to be far more suspicious than the statements made by Omtose at the outset of the game. I did state I wasn't 100% convinced, he just stands out at the moment. I'm still interested in what Serc has to say for himself, I will be around so I can still change my vote. I wasn't one of those who voted and then said I was leaving or waffled after making my coments. For now my vote stands, we'll see what Serc has to say.
Here agin, he shows he isn't doing much, Again, he is against the witch using BP. Emphasises that he wasn't 100% convinced, how convinient he mentioned that earlier. Is interested in what serc has to say. Draws the attention away from himself, to the other players, who left or waffled.
Hood's Path, on Jan 20 2009, 07:21 PM, said:
After actually hearing Serc explain his rationale behind using the BP on the first night, it makes much more sense to me. It is the most effective way to limit the Necros, would give the innos more of a chance by virtue of the greater numbers. I'm satisfied with the rest of his explanation as well.
Remove Vote
Removes vote. Suddenly changes his mind. Is completely contradictory. Suddenly, he is for the witch using her BP. Is satisfied with the rest, but doesn't go into detail. Interesting here, is that its after serc explains. If I recall correctly, serc explained that earlier. Which he would know in the first place, had he read up on him. It was probably in liosans case too. Which he'd know, if it was. Unless ofc, he was just hopping on the train, very non-commitally, without actually caring about why. Which is a scum thing to do.
Still VERY middle of the road.
Hood's Path, on Jan 20 2009, 07:26 PM, said:
Anomandaris, on Jan 20 2009, 11:17 AM, said:
Serc, on Jan 20 2009, 06:36 PM, said:
This is a completely bullshit case, and I'm amazed its managed to sway innos. If you read over this, you will notice that his only arguments are based on not liking how I play, disliking my advice given to the Witch, and also misunderstanding the word "annoy". Christ almighty, half of those posts were saying he mostly agreed with me lol. If I get lynched for that, I'm going to be fucking pissed.
The rest of your defence I could just about accept, but this did not convince me. The case is NOT completely bullshit - certainly there are parts of it that are weak to the point of being meaningless, but at its core there are your persistant attempts to magnify the perceived threat posed by the Necros. It does not do to dismiss something like this out of hand - reacting with anger makes you look, in my eyes, to be more guilty. Be rational, reasonable, and address everything as best you can, and you'd go some way to redeeming yourself in my eyes.
Vote Serc
Although I've removed my vote I will agree with Anomandaris in regards to your anger. Even if you are pissed you would have been better served by jsut laying out the facts of your argument. While the use BP on day 1 was a big factor for me, there were other people who had some legitimate questions. You didn't adress alot of those questions/suspicions in your response.
The use of the BP was a big factor, or so he says. Yet he thinks its a good idea, these days?
So, impressions:
Hoods path is very middle of the road. He is contradictory. He seems to make little effort to read up, not even sure he read lios case, he just hops on, agreeing.
In fact, over all, I dont think he's contributed at all, he's just made vague comments, voted, removed, done nothing.
Remove vote, vote hoods path
For being contradictory, making little sense, and being massively middle of the road, while trying to show a bit of content.
Thyrllan 
can't say much about that, and my inno CF won't convince anyone anyhow. I can only add that in my ever so humble opinion, if you think i'm a symp you should either look at who else I "symped" on day 1, or, better yet, focus on looking for necros, since they are, as the late Serc kept reminding us, the bigger threat.
Help
