Mafia 38: Haunted House Massacre (Game thread)
#262
Posted 19 January 2009 - 10:30 PM
Right, I'm here for a bit...I guess I should actually pitch in - I'm on the side of the people who gaze into the haze of accusations and mini-cases and don't see a whole lot of substance to any of them at this point. To be expected I suppose, but unless there are drunk posts it's going to be unlikely that much in the way of pertinent information is going to come to light this early on Day 1. But I'm here (kind of distractedly) if people want to talk...
#264
Posted 19 January 2009 - 10:40 PM
Im here... Just in the middle of some serious RL problems...
#265
Posted 19 January 2009 - 10:45 PM
I'm here, but not really all that much.
And yes, Kesso makes a good point. Of course, that might just mean people will lay low to see me get lynched
I love being the centre of my own world
And yes, Kesso makes a good point. Of course, that might just mean people will lay low to see me get lynched

I love being the centre of my own world
#266
Posted 19 January 2009 - 10:49 PM
Omtose, on Jan 19 2009, 10:45 PM, said:
I'm here, but not really all that much.
And yes, Kesso makes a good point. Of course, that might just mean people will lay low to see me get lynched
I love being the centre of my own world
And yes, Kesso makes a good point. Of course, that might just mean people will lay low to see me get lynched

I love being the centre of my own world
Exactly which point of Kesso's are you referring to? I can't tell, and haven't quite been following the convo as closely as I perhaps should.
#267
Posted 19 January 2009 - 10:55 PM
Anomandaris, on Jan 19 2009, 11:49 PM, said:
Omtose, on Jan 19 2009, 10:45 PM, said:
I'm here, but not really all that much.
And yes, Kesso makes a good point. Of course, that might just mean people will lay low to see me get lynched
I love being the centre of my own world
And yes, Kesso makes a good point. Of course, that might just mean people will lay low to see me get lynched

I love being the centre of my own world
Exactly which point of Kesso's are you referring to? I can't tell, and haven't quite been following the convo as closely as I perhaps should.
The one that a speedlynch building in the last few hours will not yield a whole lot of info about the train.
#268
Posted 19 January 2009 - 10:57 PM
Anomandaris, on Jan 19 2009, 11:30 PM, said:
Right, I'm here for a bit...I guess I should actually pitch in - I'm on the side of the people who gaze into the haze of accusations and mini-cases and don't see a whole lot of substance to any of them at this point. To be expected I suppose, but unless there are drunk posts it's going to be unlikely that much in the way of pertinent information is going to come to light this early on Day 1. But I'm here (kind of distractedly) if people want to talk...
So you're just waiting for something to just magically appear?
ah well, I'm off to bed anyways. I think she was refering to me, that little slut
#270
Posted 19 January 2009 - 11:32 PM
I'm here for an hour off n on. gonna have the browser open.
#271
Posted 19 January 2009 - 11:33 PM
sorry guys, RL preoccupations, classes and meals have kept me away till now, when it's deadtime in Europaland
so, the case on me seems that no one likes me pointintg out the obvious truth that no matter what we do statistically Day 1 lynch will be an inno, fair enough,
I DO feel the need to mention that the "summoning vote" on Meanas was a joke, though you all seem to think it wasn't. Meh, fair enough.
RE: Kesso demanding proof of his absolutism
no offence, but, yes, to me this seems to carry a certain finality of thought. I don't feel it's wise to make a decision based on 2 posts, even though this may sound like its encouraging lowposters.
edited, b/c "kole" should read "joke"
so, the case on me seems that no one likes me pointintg out the obvious truth that no matter what we do statistically Day 1 lynch will be an inno, fair enough,

I DO feel the need to mention that the "summoning vote" on Meanas was a joke, though you all seem to think it wasn't. Meh, fair enough.
RE: Kesso demanding proof of his absolutism
Kessobahn, on Jan 19 2009, 01:32 PM, said:
no offence, but, yes, to me this seems to carry a certain finality of thought. I don't feel it's wise to make a decision based on 2 posts, even though this may sound like its encouraging lowposters.
edited, b/c "kole" should read "joke"
This post has been edited by Mockra: 19 January 2009 - 11:34 PM
#272
Posted 19 January 2009 - 11:35 PM
that being said, what DO people think the numbers will be like?
going off a certain asylum game that also had killers and cult, i'm guessing 5-6 scum altogether.
going off a certain asylum game that also had killers and cult, i'm guessing 5-6 scum altogether.
#273
Posted 19 January 2009 - 11:45 PM
I'm gonna guess 2 killers 1 symp, 2 necro's and a necro killer guy.
#274
Posted 19 January 2009 - 11:49 PM
hmm
so, 2 kils per night, starting with 23 people, game can be over in like 4 days if we don't hit the undead..
my maths can be a bit off, though
so, 2 kils per night, starting with 23 people, game can be over in like 4 days if we don't hit the undead..
my maths can be a bit off, though
#276
Posted 20 January 2009 - 12:00 AM
The necros aren't necessarily going to get two recruits every night...but in the highly unlikely event that they do manage to catch everyone who gets NKed, then after 4 nights it'll be 9-3-11...so not quite a win by then. But I think we've got plenty of time - it's pretty unlikely that they're going to pick the NKed people correctly every time, after all.
#277
Posted 20 January 2009 - 12:05 AM
I should add a caveat that those assumptions are made assuming a 19-3-3 starting split.
#278
Posted 20 January 2009 - 12:11 AM
well, i'm assuming they get 1 per night, with 2 kills (1 from psychos, 1 from the Creature)
Necros get to submit 4-3 names a night, (not sure how to divide 23 by 6,
)
assuming 1 actual NK, and 1 NK recruit, with an inno lynch, in worst-case scenario, by day 5, we're down to 11 people, with necros having 7.
I think.
Necros get to submit 4-3 names a night, (not sure how to divide 23 by 6,

assuming 1 actual NK, and 1 NK recruit, with an inno lynch, in worst-case scenario, by day 5, we're down to 11 people, with necros having 7.
I think.
#279
Posted 20 January 2009 - 12:11 AM
Anomandaris, on Jan 19 2009, 04:05 PM, said:
I should add a caveat that those assumptions are made assuming a 19-3-3 starting split.
In such a large game, it wouldn't surprise me if the Killers got two or even three Symps, as they can't expand their numbers. 17-5-3 isn't nearly unbalanced, if the Killers only get one NK that can potentially be negated (and actually turned to another faction's advantage).
#280
Posted 20 January 2009 - 12:20 AM
well, to be perfectly honest, looking at the setup i'm more concerned about necnos than I am about the psychos.
Psychos just kill
Necros can kill AND recruit.
Psychos just kill
Necros can kill AND recruit.